Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
It turns out that analog allpass filters are considerably simpler
mathematically than digital allpass filters (discussed in
§B.2). In fact, when working with digital allpass filters,
it can be fruitful to convert to the analog case using the bilinear
transform (§I.3.1), so that the filter may be manipulated in the
analog
plane rather than the digital
plane. The analog case
is simpler because analog allpass filters may be described as having a
zero at
for every pole at
, while digital allpass
filters must have a zero at
for every pole at
.
In particular, the transfer function of every first-order analog
allpass filter can be written as
where
is any constant phase offset.
To see why
must be allpass, note that
its frequency response is given by
which clearly has modulus 1 for all
(since
). For real allpass filters,
complex poles must occur in conjugate pairs, so that the ``allpass
rule'' for poles and zeros may be simplified to state that a zero is
required at minus the location of every pole, i.e., every
real first-order allpass filter is of the form
and, more generally, every real allpass transfer function can be factored as
 |
(E.12) |
This simplified rule works because every complex pole
is
accompanied by its conjugate
for some
.
Multiplying out the terms in Eq.(E.12), we find that the numerator
polynomial
is simply related to the denominator polynomial
:
Since the roots of
must be in the left-half
-plane for
stability,
must be a Hurwitz polynomial, which implies
that all of its coefficients are nonnegative. The polynomial
can be seen as a
-rotation of
in the
plane; therefore,
its roots must have non-positive real parts, and its coefficients form
an alternating sequence.
As an example of the greater simplicity of analog allpass filters
relative to the discrete-time case, the graphical method for computing
phase response from poles and zeros (§8.3) gives immediately
that the phase response of every real analog allpass filter is equal
to twice the phase response of its numerator (plus
when
the frequency response is negative at dc). This is because the angle
of a vector from a pole at
to the point
along the
frequency axis is
minus the angle of the vector from a zero at
to the point
.
Subsections
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy] [Comment on this page via email]