Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
The preceding discussion considered several possible
approximations for nonlinear piano-string synthesis. Other neglected
terms in the stiff-string wave equation were not even discussed, such
as terms due to shear deformation and rotary inertia
that are included in the (highly accurate) Timoshenko beam theory
formulation [263,170]. The following questions naturally
arise:
- How do we know for sure our approximations are inaudible?
- We can listen, but could we miss an audible effect?
- Could a difference become audible after more listening?
To answer these questions, it is helpful to have a truth
reference--a ``perceptually exact'' model.
Note that there are software tools (e.g., from the world of
perceptual audio coding
[62,475]) that can be used to measure
the audible equivalence of two sounds [459]. For an
audio coder, these tools predict the audibility of the difference
between original and compressed sounds. For sound synthesis
applications, we want to compare our ``exact'' and ``computationally
efficient'' synthesis models.
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy] [Comment on this page via email]