Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
Figure 7.4 depicts the ideal spring.
Figure 7.4:
The ideal spring characterized by
.
![\includegraphics[width=3in]{eps/lspring}](img1593.png) |
From Hooke's law, we have that the applied force is proportional to the
displacement of the spring:
where it is assumed that
.
The spring constant
is sometimes called the stiffness of the
spring. Taking the Laplace transform gives
so that the impedance of a spring is
and the admittance is
This is the transfer function of a differentiator. We can say that
the ideal spring differentiates the applied force (divided by
) to
produce the output velocity.
The frequency response of the ideal spring, given the applied force
as input and resulting velocity as output, is
In this case, the amplitude response grows
dB per octave, and the phase
shift is
radians for all
. Clearly, there is no such thing as
an ideal spring which can produce arbitrarily large gain as frequency goes
to infinity; there is always some mass in a real spring.
We call
the compression velocity of the spring. In more
complicated configurations, the compression velocity is defined as the
difference between the velocity of the two spring endpoints, with positive
velocity corresponding to spring compression.
In circuit theory, the element analogous to the spring is the capacitor,
characterized by
, or
.
In an equivalent analog circuit, we can use the value
. The
inverse
of the spring stiffness is sometimes called the
compliance
of the spring.
Don't forget that the definition of impedance requires zero
initial conditions for elements with ``memory'' (masses and springs).
This means we can only use impedance descriptions for steady
state analysis. For a complete analysis of a particular system,
including the transient response, we must go back to full scale
Laplace transform analysis.
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy] [Comment on this page via email]