Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
As derived in Book II [452, Appendix G], the impulse response
of the state-space model can be summarized in the single-input,
single-output (SISO) case as
![$\displaystyle {\mathbf{h}}(n) \eqsp \left\{\begin{array}{ll} D, & n=0 \\ [5pt] CA^{n-1}B, & n>0 \\ \end{array} \right. \protect$](img264.png) |
(2.10) |
Thus, the
th sample of the impulse response is given by
for
. Each such sample generalizes to a
matrix
in the multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) case (
inputs,
outputs); in such a case, the input signal in Eq.(1.8) is
, which is a collection of
input vectors
, for
, each having dimension
,
corresponding to an impulse signal
being applied to the
th system input.
In our force-driven-mass example, we have
,
, and
. For a position output we have
while for a velocity
output we would set
. Choosing
simply feeds
the whole state vector to the output, which allows us to look at both
simultaneously:
Thus, when the input force is a unit pulse, which corresponds
physically to imparting momentum
at time 0 (because the
time-integral of force is momentum and the physical area under a unit
sample is the sampling interval
), we see that the velocity after
time 0 is a constant
, or
, as expected from
conservation of momentum. If the velocity is constant, then the
position must grow linearly, as we see that it does:
. The finite difference approximation to the time-derivative
of
now gives
, for
, which
is consistent.
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy] [Comment on this page via email]