Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
In addition to approaching a pole-zero cancellation at
, another
undesirable artifact appears as
: The transient
response also becomes long when the pole at
gets close to
the unit circle.
A plot of the impulse response for
is shown in
Fig.4.6. We see a lot of ``ringing'' near half the sampling rate.
We actually should expect this from the nonlinear-phase
distortion which is clearly evident near half the sampling rate in
Fig.4.4. We can interpret this phenomenon as the signal
components near half the sampling rate being delayed by different
amounts than other frequencies, therefore ``sliding out of alignment''
with them.
Figure 4.6:
Impulse response of the first-order
allpass interpolator for
.
![\includegraphics[width=\twidth]{eps/ap1ir}](img955.png) |
For audio applications, we would like to keep the impulse-response
duration short enough to sound ``instantaneous.'' That is, we do not
wish to have audible ``ringing'' in the time domain near
. For
high quality sampling rates, such as larger than
kHz, there
is no issue of direct audibility, since the ringing is above the range
of human hearing. However, it is often convenient, especially for
research prototyping, to work at lower sampling rates where
is
audible. Also, many commercial products use such sampling rates to
save costs.
Since the time constant of decay, in samples, of the impulse response
of a pole of radius
is approximately
and since a 60-dB decay occurs in about 7 time constants
(``
'')
[454, p. 38], we can limit the pole of the allpass filter to
achieve any prescribed specification on maximum impulse-response
duration.
For example, suppose 100 ms is chosen as the maximum
allowed
at a sampling rate of
. Then applying the above constraints
yields
, corresponding to the allowed delay range
.
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy] [Comment on this page via email]