Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
Piano Hammer Modeling
The previous section treated an ideal point-mass striking an ideal
string. This can be considered a simplified piano-hammer model. The
model can be improved by adding a damped spring to the point-mass, as
shown in Fig.9.22 (cf. Fig.9.12).
Figure 9.22:
Ideal string excited by a mass and damped
spring (a more realistic piano-hammer model).
|
The impedance of this plucking system, as seen by the string, is the
parallel combination of the mass impedance
and the damped spring
impedance
. (The damper
and spring
are formally
in series--see §7.2, for a refresher on series versus
parallel connection.) Denoting
the driving-point impedance of the hammer at the string contact-point
by
, we have
 |
(10.19) |
Thus, the scattering filters in the digital waveguide model are second
order (biquads), while for the string struck by a mass
(§9.3.1) we had first-order scattering filters. This is
expected because we added another energy-storage element (a spring).
The impedance formulation of Eq.(9.19) assumes all elements are
linear and time-invariant (LTI), but in practice one can normally
modulate element values as a function of time and/or state-variables
and obtain realistic results for low-order elements. For this we must
maintain filter-coefficient formulas that are explicit functions of
physical state and/or time. For best results, state variables should
be chosen so that any nonlinearities remain memoryless in the
digitization
[364,351,560,558].
Subsections
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy] [Comment on this page via email]