Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
Following the classical derivation of the stiff-string wave equation
[320,145], an obvious way to introduce
stiffness in the mass-spring chain is to use a bundle of
mass-spring chains to form a kind of ``lumped stranded cable''. One
section of such a model is shown in Fig.9.27. Each mass
is now modeled as a 2D mass disk. Complicated rotational
dynamics can be avoided by assuming no torsional waves (no
``twisting'' motion) (§B.4.20).
Figure 9.27:
Adding bending stiffness to the mass-spring string model.
|
A three-spring-per-mass model is shown in Fig.9.28
[268]. The spring positions alternate between angles
, say, on one side of a mass disk and
on the other side in order to provide effectively
six spring-connection points around the mass disk for only
three connecting springs per section. This improves isotropy
of the string model with respect to bending direction.
Figure 9.28:
Stiff mass-spring chain
with alternating three-spring placement.
![\includegraphics[width=0.8\twidth]{eps/masssprings3circ}](img2298.png) |
A problem with the simple mass-spring-chain-bundle is that there is no
resistance whatsoever to shear deformation, as is clear from
Fig.9.29. To rectify this problem (which does not
arise due to implicit assumptions when classically deriving the
stiff-string wave equation), diagonal springs can be added to the
model, as shown in
Fig.
.
Figure 9.29:
Illustration of the need for shear
stiffness in the model.
|
Figure:
Geometry of added shear springs.
![\includegraphics[width=0.4\twidth]{eps/masssprings3shear}](img2300.png) |
In the simulation results reported in [268], the
spring-constants of the shear springs were chosen so that their
stiffness in the longitudinal direction would equal that of the
longitudinal springs.
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy] [Comment on this page via email]