Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
As mentioned in §G.7, the phase vocoder had become a
standard analysis tool for additive synthesis
(§G.8) by the late 1970s
[186,187]. This section summarizes
that usage.
In analysis for additive synthesis, we convert a time-domain signal
into a collection of amplitude envelopes
and frequency envelopes
(or phase modulation envelopes
), as graphed in Fig.G.12.
It is usually desired that these envelopes be slowly varying
relative to the original signal. This leads to the assumption that we
have at most one sinusoid in each filter-bank channel. (By
``sinusoid'' we mean, of course, ``quasi sinusoid,'' since its
amplitude and phase may be slowly time-varying.) The channel-filter
frequency response is given by the FFT of the analysis window used
(Chapter 9).
The signal in the
subband (filter-bank channel) can be
written
![$\displaystyle x_k(t)\eqsp a_k(t)\cos[ \omega_kt + \phi_k(t) ]. \protect$](img2990.png) |
(G.3) |
In this expression,
is an amplitude modulation term,
is a fixed channel center frequency, and
is
a phase modulation (or, equivalently, the time-integral of a
frequency modulation). Using these parameters, we can resynthesize
the signal using the classic oscillator summation, as shown
in Fig.10.7 (ignoring the filtered noise in that figure).G.9
Typically, the instantaneous phase modulation
is
differentiated to obtain instantaneous frequency deviation:
 |
(G.4) |
The analysis and synthesis signal models are summarized
in Fig.G.9.
Figure G.9:
Illustration of channel vocoder
parameters in analysis (left) and synthesis (right).
![\includegraphics[width=\twidth]{eps/pvchan}](img2992.png) |
Subsections
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy] [Comment on this page via email]