Commons:Deletion requests/Image:BlocherPlakatrandaliertinTessin.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Kein Panoramafreiheit für Wahlplakate (No en:Panoramafreiheit for election ads) --User:Petar Marjanovic 19:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- Bild gehört zu einem Artikel in der deutschen Wikipedia. Der Gegenstand hier ist schon eher das sich die SVP keine Freund macht in der Schweiz, und viele der Plakate vandaliert wurden, so auch dieses! behalten --Fundriver 01:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, this is interesting. Both German and Swiss law consider "freedom of panorama" to apply to works that are placed permanently on public spaces; "permanently" means in both countries "for the natural lifetime of the work". It could be argued that the natural lifetime of an election poster extends only to the end of the election. (It won't be used for future elections.) Hence, despite the fact that the poster was displayed only for a few weeks, the photo might actually be covered by FOP... Note that in Swiss copyright law, FOP also applies to two-dimensional works, if they're permanently installed in a public place. I wonder what User:Historiograf would say on that case... Lupo 10:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- Off-topic: the image title is pretty bad, the poster has not been "randaliert" but "verunstaltet" ("vandalized"). Lupo 10:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
In de WP we didn't accept such items (Werbung für zeitlich begrenzte Veranstaltungen, wenn die Plakate danach wieder abgeräumt werden bzw. werden müssen) --Historiograf 10:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- +1; siehe dazu auch de:Panoramafreiheit#Das_Kriterium_.E2.80.9Ebleibend.E2.80.9C --77.133.13.109 17:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Imho this is not "Werbung für zeitlich begrenzte Veranstaltungen" but - because of the vandalism - an historical document showing the public disput during the campain of federal election 2007 in Switzerland. Keep it. -- 84.75.241.71 00:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Deleted per Historiograf's comment. Lupo 14:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
