Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems
  3. Article

A Study on the Use of Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms for Classifier Selection in FURIA-based Fuzzy Multiclassifiers

  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 April 2012
  • Volume 5, pages 231–253, (2012)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript
A Study on the Use of Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms for Classifier Selection in FURIA-based Fuzzy Multiclassifiers
Download PDF
  • Krzysztof Trawiński1,2,
  • Oscar Cordón1,2 &
  • Arnaud Quirin1,2 
  • 85 Accesses

  • 23 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

In a preceding contribution, we conducted a study considering a fuzzy multiclassifier system (MCS) design framework based on Fuzzy Unordered Rule Induction Algorithm (FURIA). It served as the fuzzy rule classification learning algorithm to derive the component classifiers considering bagging and feature selection. In this work, we integrate this approach under the overproduce-and-choose strategy. A state-of-the-art evolutionary multiobjective algorithm, namely NSGA-II, is used to provide a component classifier selection and improve FURIA-based fuzzy MCS. We propose five different fitness functions based on three different optimization criteria, accuracy, complexity, and diversity. Twenty UCI high dimensional datasets were considered in order to conduct the experiments. A combination between accuracy and diversity criteria provided very promising results, becoming competitive with classical MCS learning methods.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

A Study of Different Families of Fusion Functions for Combining Classifiers in the One-vs-One Strategy

Chapter © 2018

eFCMG: an evolving fuzzy classifier with participatory learning and multivariable gaussian for data stream

Article 14 March 2025

An adjustable fuzzy classification algorithm using an improved multi-objective genetic strategy based on decomposition for imbalance dataset

Article 26 February 2019

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Algorithms
  • Categorization
  • Computational Intelligence
  • Learning algorithms
  • Machine Learning
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Neuro-Fuzzy Systems and Computational Intelligence

References

  1. L. Kuncheva. Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley, 2004.

  2. S.J. Verzi, G.L. Heileman, and M. Georgiopoulos. Boosted ARTMAP: Modifications to fuzzy ARTMAP motivated by boosting theory. Neural Networks, 19(4):446–468, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Pedrycz and K.C. Kwak. Boosting of granular models. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157(22):2934–2953, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Takahashi and H. Honda. A new reliable cancer diagnosis method using boosted fuzzy classifier with a SWEEP operator method. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 38(9):763–773, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Canul-Reich, L. Shoemaker, and L.O. Hall. Ensembles of fuzzy classifiers. In IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pages 1–6, London (UK), 2007.

  6. Y. Nojima and H. Ishibuchi. Genetic rule selection with a multi-classifier coding scheme for ensemble classifier design. International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems, 4(3):157–169, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Marsala. Data mining with ensembles of fuzzy decision trees. In IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, pages 348–354, Nashville (USA), 2009.

  8. P. P. Bonissone, J. M. Cadenas, M. C. Garrido, and R. A. Díaz-Valladares. A fuzzy random forest. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 51(7):729–747, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  9. O. Cordón, A. Quirin, and L. Sánchez. A first study on bagging fuzzy rule-based classification systems with multicriteria genetic selection of the component classifiers. In Third International Workshop on Genetic and Evolving Fuzzy Systems (GEFS), pages 11–16, Witten-Bommerholz (Germany), 2008.

  10. O. Cordón and A. Quirin. Comparing two genetic overproduce-and-choose strategies for fuzzy rule-based multiclassification systems generated by bagging and mutual information-based feature selection. International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems, 7(1):45–64, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Trawiński, A. Quirin, and O. Cordón. Bi-criteria genetic selection of bagging fuzzy rule-based multiclassification systems. In IFSA/EUSFLAT Conf., pages 1514–1519, 2009.

  12. K. Trawiński, A. Quirin, and O. Cordón. On the combination of accuracy and diversity measures for genetic selection of bagging fuzzy rule-based multiclassification systems. International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA), 0:121–127, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Partridge and W.B. Yates. Engineering multiversion neural-net systems. Neural Computation, 8(4):869–893, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. O. Cordón, F. Herrera, F. Hoffmann, and L. Magdalena. Genetic Fuzzy Systems. Evolutionary Tuning and Learning of Fuzzy Knowledge Bases. World Scientific, 2001.

  15. O. Cordón, F. Gomide, F. Herrera, F. Hoffmann, and L. Magdalena. Ten years of genetic fuzzy systems: Current framework and new trends. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 141(1):5–31, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Herrera. Genetic fuzzy systems: taxonomy, current research trends and prospects. Evolutionary Intelligence, 1(1):27–46, January 2008.

  17. K. Trawiński, O. Cordón, and A. Quirin. On designing fuzzy multiclassifier systems by combining furia with bagging and feature selection. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 19(4):589–633, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. C. Hühn and E. Hüllermeier. FURIA: an algorithm for unordered fuzzy rule induction. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 19(3):293–319, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. C. Hühn and E. Hüllermeier. An analysis of the FURIA algorithm for fuzzy rule induction. In Advances in Machine Learning I, pages 321–344. 2010.

  20. T. Ho. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(8):832–844, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Battiti. Using mutual information for selecting features in supervised neural net learning. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(4):537–550, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T.A. Feo and M.G.C. Resende. Greedy randomized adaptive search procedures. Journal of Global Optimization, 6:109–133, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. H. Ishibuchi, T. Nakashima, and M. Nii. Classification and Modeling with Linguistic Information Granules: Advanced Approaches to Linguistic Data Mining (Advanced Information Processing). Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., Secaucus, NJ, USA, 2004.

  24. C.A. Coello, G.B. Lamont, and D.A. Van Veldhuizen. Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, 2nd Edition. Springer, 2007.

  25. Ludmila I. Kuncheva and Christopher J. Whitaker. Measures of diversity in classifier ensembles and their relationship with the ensemble accuracy. Machine Learning, 51(2):181–207, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Ruta and B. Gabrys. Classifier selection for majority voting. Information Fusion, 6(1):63–81, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Tsymbal, M. Pechenizkiy, and P. Cunningham. Diversity in search strategies for ensemble feature selection. Information Fusion, 6(1):83–98, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6:182–197, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. E.M. Dos Santos, R. Sabourin, and P. Maupin. Single and multi-objective genetic algorithms for the selection of ensemble of classifiers. In International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pages 3070–3077, Vancouver, 2006.

  30. E.M. Dos Santos, R. Sabourin, and P. Maupin. A dynamic overproduce-and-choose strategy for the selection of classifier ensembles. Pattern Recognition, 41(10):2993–3009, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  31. T.G. Dietterich. An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: bagging, boosting, and randomization. Machine Learning, 40(2):139–157, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R.E. Banfield, L.O. Hall, K.W. Bowyer, and W.P. Kegelmeyer. A comparison of decision tree ensemble creation techniques. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29(1):173–180, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  33. D. Optiz and R. Maclin. Popular ensemble methods: an empirical study. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11:169–198, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  34. L. Breiman. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2):123–140, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Schapire. The strength of weak learnability. Machine Learning, 5(2):197–227, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Z.H. Zhou. Ensembling local learners through multimodal perturbation. IEEE Transactions of Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 35(4):725–735, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  37. L. Xu, A. Krzyzak, and C.Y. Suen. Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their application to handwriting recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(3):418–435, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  38. L. Breiman. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1):5–32, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  39. M.J. del Jesus, F. Hoffmann, L.J. Navascues, and L. Sánchez. Induction of fuzzy-rule-based classifiers with evolutionary boosting algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 12(3):296–308, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  40. L. Sánchez and J. Otero. Boosting fuzzy rules in classification problems under single-winner inference. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 22(9):1021–1034, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  41. H. Takahashi and H. Honda. Lymphoma prognostication from expression profiling using a combination method of boosting and projective adaptive resonance theory. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 39(7):767–771, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  42. C. Z. Janikow. Fuzzy decision trees: issues and methods. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, 28(1):1–14, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  43. J.J. Aguilera, M. Chica, M.J. del Jesus, and F. Herrera. Niching genetic feature selection algorithms applied to the design of fuzzy rule based classification systems. In IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pages 1794–1799, London (UK), 2007.

  44. Y. Nojima and H. Ishibuchi. Designing fuzzy ensemble classifiers by evolutionary multiobjective optimization with an entropy-based diversity criterion. In International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems and Conference on Neuro-Computing and Evolving Intelligence, Auckland, New Zealand, 2006.

  45. H. Ishibuchi and Y. Nojima. Evolutionary multiobjective optimization for the design of fuzzy rule-based ensemble classifiers. International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems, 3(3):129–145, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  46. R. Schapire, Y. Freund, P. Bartlett, and W. Lee. Boosting the margin: A new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 322–330, Nashville (USA), 1997.

  47. B.V. Dasarathy and B.V. Sheela. A composite classifier system design: Concepts and methodology. Proceedings of IEEE, 67(5):708–713, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  48. L.S. Oliveira, M. Morita, R. Sabourin, and F. Bortolozzi. Multi-objective genetic algorithms to create ensemble of classifiers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3410:592–606, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  49. W. W. Cohen. Fast effective rule induction. In In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 115–123. Morgan Kaufmann, 1995.

  50. H. Ishibuchi, T. Nakashima, and T. Morisawa. Voting in fuzzy rule-based systems for pattern classification problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 103(2):223–238, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  51. O. Cordón, M.J. del Jesus, and F. Herrera. A proposal on reasoning methods in fuzzy rule-based classification systems. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 20:21–45, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  52. P. Panov and S. Džeroski. Combining bagging and random subspaces to create better ensembles. In IDA’07: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Intelligent data analysis, pages 118–129, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Springer-Verlag.

  53. E. Zitzler and L. Thiele. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength pareto approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3:257–271, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  54. J. R. Quinlan. C4.5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1993.

  55. T.G. Dietterich. Approximate statistical test for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 10(7):1895–1923, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  56. J. Knowles and D. Corne. On metrics for comparing nondominated sets. In 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC ‘02, volume 1, pages 711–716, 2002.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. European Centre for Soft Computing, Mieres, Spain

    Krzysztof Trawiński, Oscar Cordón & Arnaud Quirin

  2. Edificio Científico-Tecnológico, Calle Gonzalo Gutiérrez Quirós S/N, Mieres, 33600, Asturias, Spain

    Krzysztof Trawiński, Oscar Cordón & Arnaud Quirin

Authors
  1. Krzysztof Trawiński
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oscar Cordón
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arnaud Quirin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krzysztof Trawiński.

Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC license (https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trawiński, K., Cordón, O. & Quirin, A. A Study on the Use of Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms for Classifier Selection in FURIA-based Fuzzy Multiclassifiers. Int J Comput Intell Syst 5, 231–253 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2012.685272

Download citation

  • Received: 22 November 2010

  • Accepted: 01 April 2011

  • Published: 01 April 2012

  • Issue date: April 2012

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2012.685272

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Fuzzy rule-based multiclassification systems
  • bagging
  • FURIA
  • genetic selection of individual classifiers
  • diversity measures
  • evolutionary multiobjective optimization
  • NSGA-II

Associated Content

Part of a collection:

Evolutionary Fuzzy Systems

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature