Draft talk:Gaetano Minale

Seeking Guidance on Improving Article to Meet Wikipedia's Standards

Hello editors,

I’m reaching out for advice on how to improve this article draft so it meets Wikipedia’s guidelines. I am a paid contributor working on behalf of a client, and I’m committed to ensuring this article aligns with Wikipedia's policies, especially regarding neutrality, notability, and reliable sourcing. The draft was recently declined with feedback indicating concerns about the neutrality of the content and insufficient references to establish notability. Here are some specific areas where I’d appreciate guidance: Sources for Notability: Could you clarify what types of sources would best demonstrate notability for this subject? I have referenced several sources, but I realize they may not meet the necessary standards. Any advice on the types of secondary, independent sources I should look for would be very helpful. Neutrality and Tone: I understand the importance of maintaining a neutral tone, and I’m reviewing the article to eliminate any promotional language. If there are specific sections or phrases that stand out as non-neutral, please let me know so I can focus on adjusting them. Thank you in advance for any guidance or specific feedback you can offer. I’m committed to making the necessary changes to ensure the draft meets Wikipedia’s standards.

Best regards, InfoExpertWriter InfoExpertWriter (talk) 15:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

@InfoExpertWriter: No amount of editing can make a non-notable subject notable and that is the (main) issue. SmartSE (talk) 16:23, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the feedback, SmartSE. I understand that notability is the main issue, and I’ll re-evaluate the sources to ensure compliance with Wikipedia’s standards. InfoExpertWriter (talk) 00:32, 29 October 2024 (UTC)