Jump to content

User talk:Elizium23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 47.20.177.163 (talk) at 00:05, 2 November 2022. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

  • Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
    • If I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
  • Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
    • Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
    • Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
  • To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
  • You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

Wellness check

Hoping you are doing well; saw you very abruptly disappeared from editing pages affiliated with Wikiproject Catholicism and wanted to check in. Noticed something might be up when you didn't respond to my various diocesan page edits and my note on the project talk page. I don't know you but I'll pray for you because I get the feeling something funny is up. Take care of yourself and I hope to see you again. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:05, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same. I wonder what's up. Also, what is Lowercase Sigmabot III? It keeps deleting my topic and I don't know what's going on. 2601:980:100:360:55DA:D54A:F936:EC2F (talk) 13:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @User:Elizium23, I edited from an IP address until recently. I would work on projects alongside you and other WP:Catholic editors. I noticed that you suddenly stopped editing a month ago, and I want to make sure everything is okay. Cheers, WikiIsKnowledge (talk) 01:16, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti and WikiIsKnowledge: Elizium23 may be on an unannounced wikibreak, but you may wish to try the "email" option to reach out. Hopefully all is well with them. —Locke Cole • t • c 23:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Locke Cole, thanks for the suggestion. I already reached out. Weird, though, that I didn't get a "ping" notification from your comment. Thanks, WikiIsKnowledge (talk) 22:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiIsKnowledge: Odd, I got your notification. It may be because I was adding two sections during the edit, or the subsequent edit where I merged the sections canceled the ping? I don't think I ran afoul of any of the requirements listed at mw:Manual:Echo (though the page is currently tagged as "outdated", and there is a catchall all markup is parsed with regular expressions; sufficiently tricky markup can trigger bogus results at the bottom of that page). —Locke Cole • t • c 16:08, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just noticed I hadn't seen you around in quite a while. Hope you are well, Elizium23, and that we see you back on Wikipedia when you are in the mood to edit. Liz Read! Talk! 01:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Liz: yes indeed, thank you for your concern, all who've inquired about me! In fact, I'm gainfully employed now (a rarity in Elizium23's five decades of life) and so, I've de-emphasized Wiki as a priority for time/effort. I don't expect to be active in the foreseeable future (work is marvelous!), but I have popped in while not logged into my account, I must confess. That's all for now. Elizium23 (talk) 23:47, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

This revert was bad. You have re-inserted uncited information into a biography of a living person. Why? — Trey Maturin has spoken 12:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Elizium

Dear user elizium , in my last edit I had added in a link directly backing up my changes onto this page . Savita died of sepsis not as a result of the fact that she couldn’t have access to abortion but sadly and simply the fact that she was neglected . I wanted to make that point in this article (that is for the public to gain knowledge on not just a one person stance page ). I am not trying to cover your work over or dumb anything down I just would like more non bias wording and facts in this piece . Some of the first paragraph is simply not a fact . Ernesto parot (talk) 23:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jerry Leaf: reverted edit

Hi, What was the reasoning behind reverting my edit regarding the death date of Jerry Leaf? Regards, Mill 1 (talk) 20:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Crucifix. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 47.20.177.163 (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Elizium23&oldid=1119513311"