Talk:Fairly OddBaby
Template:WikiProject Nickelodeon
Animation Redirect‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This is a talk page for discussion of the article about Fairly OddBaby. Wikipedia is not a gossip site. Unecessary information that will not improve Wikipedia will be removed. Please see "Wikipedia is not a soapbox" and "wikiquette" for information about the proper use of talk pages. |
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
This article needs some serious work done to it.
I believe that this article needs some serious work done to it. I will try my best to do what I can, but I would like to encourage others to help out, also. There are many grammar problems, irrelevant links, useless sentences and sections, etc. Please do whatever you can to make this article better. - J-Whitt (talk) 21:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Agreed. It really needs work, and currently reads like it was written in 5 minutes. Lord Of Demise (talk) 23:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
There, i rewrote the ENTIRE story over again. It was like written in 5 mins, and if you look at mine, you can tell I took the time. Your Welcome everyoneOnepiece226 (talk) 02:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Onepiece226
there was a lack of commas and capitalization so i fixed that, i might have missed something though. the plot is way too short for a movie!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.220.162 (talk) 03:50, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
No I was the one who made the long plot, but then someone put it back to a smaller one!Onepiece226 (talk) 22:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)Onepiece226
- Please read WP:PLOT to understand why. Powers T 16:09, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
the inconsistantcies section is all stupid opinions, it should be removed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.191.68 (talk) 04:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:The Fairly OddParents - Baby Poof.png
The image Image:The Fairly OddParents - Baby Poof.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --09:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Poof
I know that its not article worthy, but I thought that some people might be interested to know that 'poof' (short for 'poofter') is the British equivalant of the American word 'fag' (short for 'faggot'). Zestos (talk) 01:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)