Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard

Bureaucrats' noticeboard archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

To contact bureaucrats to alert them of an urgent issue, please post below.
For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.

You may use this tool to locate recently active bureaucrats.

Click here to add a new section

Shortcuts

The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.

This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.

Crat tasks
RfAs	0
RfBs	0
Overdue RfBs	0
Overdue RfAs	0
BRFAs	14
Approved BRFAs	0

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

It is 02:38:08 on December 3, 2024, according to the server's time and date.

Desysop, please

Done — xaosflux ^Talk 16:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Seems I got logged out before.

Please desysop me for now, I am feeling burned out and I had not noticed, which is bad. Thoughtful people have made comments that indicate I need time off the abuse watch. Guy (Help!) 16:52, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you for your service. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:29, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Restore admin

I've unretired, and hereby request restoration of my bit. Thanks, Dloh cierekim 07:25, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back Dlohcierekim, there is a standard 24-hour hold for commentary on this type of request. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dloh cierekim 13:29, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A very welcomed return to the admin corps. Good to see you with a mop again.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your kind words. It's good to be back. Dloh cierekim 17:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And

Done, with great happiness. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 09:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resysop request Lord Voldemort.

Request withdrawn by requester - may re-request at any time. — xaosflux ^Talk 16:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lord Voldemort (current rights · rights management · rights log (local) · rights log (global/meta) · block log)

Trying to get back into the editing realm. I'd like to be resysopped, and understand there will be a wait until people can chime in. Thank you. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 15:14, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't really relevant to your entitlement to regain your tools, but why wouldn't you want to edit for a while before asking to be resysopped? You haven't done any serious editing since July 2006.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another example of why we need a better inactivity policy. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 15:33, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose you're absolutely right. Nevermind this re-sysop request. I'll just fade back into the ether and re-request once I've been back active a bit more. I suppose this can be closed now. Thank you anyway. --LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 15:40, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn by requester. — xaosflux ^Talk 16:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.