Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard

Bureaucrats' noticeboard archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by .

To contact bureaucrats to alert them of an urgent issue, please post below.
For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.

You may use this tool to locate recently active bureaucrats.

Click here to add a new section

Shortcuts

The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.

This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.

If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.

To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.

Crat tasks
RfAs	0
RfBs	0
Overdue RfBs	0
Overdue RfAs	0
BRFAs	16
Approved BRFAs	0

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

It is 06:43:54 on December 1, 2024, according to the server's time and date.

Change to the inactivity policy

A proposed change to the administrator inactivity policy has been approved by the community. Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA. Bureaucrats will need to check the logs of anyone requesting a resysop on the bureaucrats' noticeboard (or elsewhere) to ensure they meet the new requirements. 28bytes (talk) 07:28, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Inactive_administrators/2018#March_2018

The following Wikipedia:Inactive_administrators/2018#March_2018 administrators are being desysoped due to inactivity. Thank you for your service.

Gogo Dodo (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Sebastiankessel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Pb30 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Rspeer (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
SoLando (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
Seicer (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)

— xaosflux ^Talk 03:43, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note, it appears Sebastiankessel is the first admin that will be impacted by the new "5 year" rule as well. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:45, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rspeer (talk · contribs) should not have been desysopped, as they made a couple of edits yesterday. Graham87 12:09, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undone I missed that edit during my normal checks because of the bot errors in creating the table and having an off-cycle. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]