Jump to content

Talk:Brierfield Plantation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Slaves Were "Fleeing"?

[edit]

The article states that the slaves were "fleeing" the advancing Union army. This strikes me as potentially POV. To say that the slaves were "fleeing" suggests that they were happy and content until the Union army disrupted their peaceful and productive lives. Could they have been "fleeing" merely because they had long desired to be free, saw the opportunity, and took advantage of it?John Paul Parks (talk) 14:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brierfield Plantation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:33, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Diversity editing

[edit]

Some distinctly non-encyc POV editing here.

The opening words define Brierfield as a ‘large forced-labor cotton farm’, from which the hyperlink re-directs to a page titled ‘Plantation’, which is self-evidently the more encyclopedic definition.

‘With his brother's financial assistance and the forced labor of enslaved people, Jefferson Davis became a successful planter…’ We hardly need reminding that the plantations used slaves, or that the property ‘had been bought with their stolen labor’. (There are plenty of other Wiki-pages on which to debate employment ethics.) In any case, Davis was known to have been one of the more benevolent landlords, as a Kentuckian by birth. Valetude (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. The linked article ("Plantation") does not mention slavery in the intro or for several hundred words; we should probably replace it with a link to "Plantation complexes in the Southern United States." But even this more specific and relevant article says only that plantations "generally" relied on slavery. So in any case, the Brierfield Plantation article must specify that it was a forced-labor cotton farm, as opposed to a plantation that may or may not have used slaves. Nor does Davis' "benevolence", whatever that may mean, somehow relieve this article from explaining how this farm was purchased and worked. PRRfan (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brierfield_Plantation&oldid=1200153243"