Skip to content

Compare Hub and Engine API references #22552

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
1 task done
sarahsanders-docker opened this issue May 1, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

Compare Hub and Engine API references #22552

sarahsanders-docker opened this issue May 1, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
area/api Relates to Docker API docs wtd-project Relates to WTD API docs project

Comments

@sarahsanders-docker
Copy link
Collaborator

Is this a docs issue?

  • My issue is about the documentation content or website

Type of issue

Other

Description

Task: Compare Hub and Engine API references. Note what each does well, and what needs worked on. Also note discrepancies or areas of improvement.

Location

https://docs.docker.com/reference/

Suggestion

No response

@sarahsanders-docker sarahsanders-docker added the wtd-project Relates to WTD API docs project label May 1, 2025
@lizargall
Copy link

Please use more user oriented language at the top of the fold. This will will help users know why they are on a page and how it is useful to them. It will also make it easier for search engines and AI to parse, you can't have any presumed context with them.

https://docs.docker.com/reference/api/engine/version/v1.49/

https://docs.docker.com/reference/

@lizargall
Copy link

See also #22561

@sarahsanders-docker sarahsanders-docker added the area/api Relates to Docker API docs label May 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/api Relates to Docker API docs wtd-project Relates to WTD API docs project
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants