+ Dev.to link

Author: tomByrer

Diff for: README.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ## Testing the test systems: CodeceptJS + Playwright vs Cypress
 
-[CodeceptJS](https://codecept.io/) & [Playwright](https://github.com/microsoft/playwright) seems like a good, though newer, combo for automation testing.  [Cypress](https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress) is mature and has a slick GUI.  I used this repo to test the testers, then wrote about on Dev.io.
+[CodeceptJS](https://codecept.io/) & [Playwright](https://github.com/microsoft/playwright) seems like a good, though newer, combo for automation testing.  [Cypress](https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress) is mature and has a slick GUI.  I used this repo to test the testers, then wrote about on [Dev.to](https://dev.to/tombyrer/testing-testers-codeceptjs-playwright-vs-cypressio-28pc).
 
 ### Usage
 

Diff for: article.md

@@ -134,4 +134,3 @@ However, if you have a more junior test team, prefer to use a product backed by
 *Aside*: if you get tired of Codecept, you *could* use Playwright directly, but you'll have to rewrite the tests.   But I feel Codecept makes life more tester-friendly, so it is worth the extra overhead.
 
 I hope you enjoyed this overview!  Please add comments & suggestions below.
-