SJGII
Joined Jul 2007
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Reviews32
SJGII's rating
David Fincher's The Game (1997) is a masterfully crafted psychological thriller that takes audiences on a relentless journey through suspense and existential dread, epitomizing Fincher's talent for tension and ambiguity. Starring Michael Douglas at the height of his powers, The Game delivers a nuanced portrayal of Nicholas Van Orton, a wealthy but emotionally isolated investment banker who's forced to confront the frayed edges of his humanity when he's entangled in a seemingly inescapable game set up by a shadowy company.
What makes The Game remarkable is its seamless blend of psychological horror and mind-bending mystery. Fincher meticulously constructs an atmosphere of paranoia, where every interaction and setting seems to ripple with hidden motives. Douglas captures Van Orton's increasing desperation with chilling precision, turning his initial aloof confidence into a frantic search for control as reality slips through his fingers. Sean Penn's role as his unpredictable brother, Conrad, adds an additional layer of unpredictability that keeps the audience on edge.
With Fincher's signature visual style-sharp, brooding cinematography and an artful use of shadow-San Francisco itself becomes a character, embodying both opulence and urban alienation. The film's pacing is taut, pulling viewers deeper into its dark, intricate world and unraveling Van Orton's psyche in ways both disturbing and sympathetic. By the film's climactic revelation, audiences are left questioning the nature of control and the illusions we build around our lives.
The Game is not merely a thriller; it's an exploration of identity, control, and the crushing weight of personal responsibility. It's a film that begs for multiple viewings, rewarding audiences with new insights each time.
What makes The Game remarkable is its seamless blend of psychological horror and mind-bending mystery. Fincher meticulously constructs an atmosphere of paranoia, where every interaction and setting seems to ripple with hidden motives. Douglas captures Van Orton's increasing desperation with chilling precision, turning his initial aloof confidence into a frantic search for control as reality slips through his fingers. Sean Penn's role as his unpredictable brother, Conrad, adds an additional layer of unpredictability that keeps the audience on edge.
With Fincher's signature visual style-sharp, brooding cinematography and an artful use of shadow-San Francisco itself becomes a character, embodying both opulence and urban alienation. The film's pacing is taut, pulling viewers deeper into its dark, intricate world and unraveling Van Orton's psyche in ways both disturbing and sympathetic. By the film's climactic revelation, audiences are left questioning the nature of control and the illusions we build around our lives.
The Game is not merely a thriller; it's an exploration of identity, control, and the crushing weight of personal responsibility. It's a film that begs for multiple viewings, rewarding audiences with new insights each time.
Perhaps it helped, but I was aware of the negative reviews before I watched Dangerous Waters. I almost expected a really bad movie. What I got was an enjoyable B grade of a film that was both messy and good throughout. Ray Liotta was barely in this, but I must say that I was still impressed by his performance. We truly lost a very talented artist because his intense glare will haunt me forever. I also liked Odeya Rush's performance as the resilient Rose. Rush can act and I think she did a good job with what she was given to work with. Sadly, I can't say the same for Eric Dane. That's not to say he was bad, but he could have been more convincing. It was as if he was trying too hard at times, and sometimes less is more. All in all, I liked this. It's not gonna get any Oscars, but I was entertained. RIP Ray Liotta.
If you're looking for a movie with a simple human story and great performances, you might really enjoy this film. However, if you're seeking a more complex and deep human story, you'll probably be a little disappointed. The issue I have with 'Last Flag Flying' is that it gives the impression of being much deeper than it really is. Perhaps it's because I'm comparing it to 'The Last Detail,' a movie that wasn't overly complex but still left a lasting impression. It wasn't too long, and it was never dull. 'Last Flag Flying' was both. Yet, you can't call it a bad film. Personally, I loved Cranston's performance. He's no Nicholson, but he is certainly a talented actor. Yes, the movie isn't attempting to be a sequel to 'The Last Detail,' but we need some basis for comparison. I did that, and it simply doesn't carry the same weight. Nevertheless, it's still a decent movie, to some extent.