tarincarpenter

This was the 2250 film I've watched and added to my IMDb list , it is also the worst film on that list . At first I though Riener was just getting a little to set into a style of yesterday and reluctant to make a film that could resonate with anyone under the age of 60 , I mean he could have told the same story placing it into a different decade to at least make it a little more connectable to viewers. But the miss fires go beyond that including, the narration which is a failed attempt to replicate "the wonder years" , the filming style which is also similar to a television program , as well as the needle drops which are the same songs you've heard in every film set in this time and released in the 80's . And to take it even further , repetitively using the term "retard" and casting a non disabled person to actually go "full retard" in a deception of a mentally challenged person was disturbing. To make a film this terrible, especially with such credible actors and such a distinguished director is actually quite a accomplishment that deserves a 1/10 which is nearly impossible to score yet still be available to watch.

Crispin glover is the worst actor in the history of film , I can only imagine that Keanu was inspired by Crispins over actung when he stared in bill and teds , Robert Zemeckis did some how made it work with back to the future .. but the guy is terrible and always over acting and out of touch with his characters ... this film would have been great with anyone else besides him .. with him it's unwatchable ..

This may not be the worst film on the history of film. Or maybe it is, Franco is the only reason I didn't give it a 1/10. Over 1500 films I've watched this one is definitely in the bottom 50. Vince Vaughn continues his streak of bad movies.