Release CalendarTop 250 MoviesMost Popular MoviesBrowse Movies by GenreTop Box OfficeShowtimes & TicketsMovie NewsIndia Movie Spotlight
    What's on TV & StreamingTop 250 TV ShowsMost Popular TV ShowsBrowse TV Shows by GenreTV News
    What to WatchLatest TrailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily Entertainment GuideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsPride MonthAmerican Black Film FestivalSummer Watch GuideSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll Events
    Born TodayMost Popular CelebsCelebrity News
    Help CenterContributor ZonePolls
For Industry Professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign In
Sign In
New Customer? Create account
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Wuchakk's profile image

Wuchakk

Joined Dec 2004
Write me at: dltoes@msn.com

My All-Time Favorite Movies: http://www.imdb.com/list/ls070122364/

Film Axioms:

  • No genre is beyond redemption or above contempt.


  • Just because a movie's good doesn't mean you'll like it; just because you like it doesn't mean it's good.


  • Italians have been making the worst movies for a hundred years.


  • Howard Hawks supplied the simplest definition of a good movie: "Three great scenes. No bad scenes."


  • Nine out of ten times when there's a bar scene in a movie there's a fight.


  • Every great auteur/actor has a bad or dubious film; but, remember, even God created the cockroach.


  • People who go overboard with criticism -- e.g. "This is the worst film ever!" or "I'd give this 0/10 if I could!" -- lose credibility as reviewers. The same goes with overrating a movie.


  • Honest reviewers must resist the influence of mass hype when a popular film debuts. Separating it from the initial epidemic fervor is mandatory in determining it's true worth. (Remember when Roger Ebert gave Peter Jackson's "King Kong" a perfect rating of 4/4 Stars? Why sure!).


  • Movies are life with the boring bits taken out.


  • A movie can be technically well-made, but void of depth. The reverse is also true: A movie can be technically deficient (usually due to low-budget), but thematically wealthy. Whereas the ideal is to have both, sometimes a movie's budget doesn't allow for top-notch filmmaking, but it can still soar in the realm of worthy mindfood. Some excellent examples from my reviews include "From Within," "Billy Jack" and "Tribes." Many episodes of the original Star Trek TV series are great examples as well, such as "Space Seed," "The Naked Time" or "The City on the Edge of Forever."


  • Movies must be critiqued and graded according to what they are and aspire to achieve. For instance, 1998's "Godzilla" is a colossal-creature movie and should therefore be reviewed on that level. Compared to the original "Apocalypse Now" it's dreck, but how does it stack-up to other gigantic-monster movies?


  • Reviewers who intentionally say false things about a film reveal a personal vendetta against it and lose all credibility as reviewers. Don't even give these types of "reviewers" and their "reviews" the time of day.


  • Movies are the modern-day campfire tales of centuries past. They entertain, amuse, inspire and mentor. Generally speaking, they provide the mythology that helps the modern world cope with reality.


  • I see a lot of reviewers giving movies 10/10 Stars or 1/10 Stars when, the reality is, most movies fall between 5/10 Stars and 7/10 Stars.


  • Disregarding profits, the main purpose of a movie is to entertain; the secondary purpose is to convey a message. The better the entertainment and message, the better the movie. The reverse is also true.


  • In 99 out of 100 movies, if something doesn't happen by the end of the first reel, nothing's gonna happen (at least nothing compelling, effective, original or inspiring).


  • Popularity at the box office is very important for people who's opinion of an artistic work needs validated by others (rolling my eyes).


  • A movie that doesn't do well at the box office isn't always an indicator that it's bad; it could mean something interesting is going on that's too far out of the norm for mass consumption. "Watchmen" and (believe it or not) "The Wizard of Oz" are good examples ("Wizard" bombed when it debuted in 1939).


  • Watching a movie is like seeing someone else's hallucination. You have to be willing to enter into the film's 'world' to appreciate it. If you can't, you won't.


  • The rating of a movie is irrelevant (G, PG, PG-13, R). Does more gore, more nudity, more cussing, more overt sexual situations determine the worthiness of a film? Maybe for 13 year-olds. Is "The Wizard of OZ" a lousy film because it's rated G? How about the original "Planet of the Apes"?


  • While good movies can be made with big budgets, big names, big stunts and incredible F/X, they can also be made with small budgets, creative writers & directors and no-name-but-quality actors.


  • No one sets out to make a bad movie.


  • It's always preferable to watch an entertaining mess over a competent bore-fest.


  • Art (including film) is not meant to be an imitation of reality, but rather an interpretation of it.


  • Never watch a movie starring Jean-Claude Van Damme.

=========================

RATING GUIDE:

10/10 Stars: A+ (Top-of-the-line)
9/10 Stars: A (Excellent)
8/10 Stars: A- (Breaks the threshold of greatness)
7/10 Stars: B+ or B (Very good or, at least, good)
6/10 Stars: B or B- (Marginal "thumbs up")
5/10 Stars: C+ or C (Too flawed to recommend, but some worthwhile aspects)
4/10 Stars: C or C- (Severely mediocre or flawed)
3/10 Stars: D+ or D (Cinematic flotsam)
2/10 Stars: D or D- ("Brain and brain, what is brain?")
1/10 Star: F (Worthless garbage for one important reason or another)

Note: Like everyone else, I tend to watch movies I think I might like, which explains my numerous positive ratings.

=========================

Favorite Film of All Time:

Apocalypse Now

TV Axiom:

  • Every ten years or so a TV show comes along that doesn't suck.
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.

Ratings3.3K

Wuchakk's rating
The Second Chance
6.46
The Second Chance
The Diamond of Jeru
4.97
The Diamond of Jeru
The High Commissioner
6.17
The High Commissioner
The Munsters' Revenge
5.97
The Munsters' Revenge
Munster, Go Home!
6.47
Munster, Go Home!
Spring Break
4.96
Spring Break
Nerve
5.76
Nerve
The Other Side of Heaven
6.24
The Other Side of Heaven
Serena
5.46
Serena
Gorky Park
6.77
Gorky Park
Justice League
6.07
Justice League
They Rode West
5.97
They Rode West
Bubble Boy
5.78
Bubble Boy
Follow the River
6.27
Follow the River
Death Defying Acts
5.86
Death Defying Acts
Run the Wild Fields
7.18
Run the Wild Fields
The Wrong Daughter
4.86
The Wrong Daughter
The Invisible Man
7.15
The Invisible Man
The Invisible Man
7.67
The Invisible Man
Wolf Man
5.66
Wolf Man
The Notebook
7.87
The Notebook
Bonhoeffer: Agent of Grace
6.37
Bonhoeffer: Agent of Grace
Carnal Knowledge
6.96
Carnal Knowledge
The Shadow of Chikara
5.36
The Shadow of Chikara
The Castle of the Living Dead
5.77
The Castle of the Living Dead

Lists17

  • Marlon Brando and Martin Sheen in Apocalypse Now (1979)
    Memorable Movie Lines
    • 207 titles
    • Public
    • Modified Apr 10, 2025
  • Marlon Brando and Martin Sheen in Apocalypse Now (1979)
    Francis Ford Coppola's Movies Favorite-to-Least-Favorite
    • 24 titles
    • Public
    • Modified Feb 26, 2025
  • Kevin Costner in Dances with Wolves (1990)
    Best Westerns
    • 92 titles
    • Public
    • Modified Nov 09, 2024
  • Marilyn Eastman, Duane Jones, and Judith Ridley in Night of the Living Dead (1968)
    Cult Movies That Don't SUCK
    • 116 titles
    • Public
    • Modified Jul 17, 2024
See all lists

Reviews3.2K

Wuchakk's rating
The Diamond of Jeru

The Diamond of Jeru

4.9
7
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • Serious jungle adventure with mature themes in the wilds of Borneo

    In the mid-1950s, a pompous American & his wife (Keith Carradine and Paris Jefferson) hire dubious guides to go up a river in search of diamonds in Sarawak. Meanwhile a haunted Korean War veteran (Billy Zane) keep an eye on them with his native protégé.

    "The Diamond of Jeru" (2001) originated from an unfinished 1950s' story by Louis L'Amour, completed by his son Beau and used for this movie (eventually published in audio form in 2015). While I suppose it's comparable to Indiana Jones movies and, especially, David Keith's knockoff "The Further Adventures of Tennessee Buck," it lacks the flippancy of those flicks, as well as similar ones, like "King Solomon's Mines" (1985) and "Firewalker." This is a serious jungle adventure with bits of "Apocalypse Now," just on a less-impressive TV-budget and script elements reminiscent of L'Amour's "The Quick and the Dead" with Sam Elliott (1987).

    I felt disappointed the first time I watched it, but appreciated it more on my second viewing for several reasons. I liked the realism and was drawn into the characters as I paid closer attention to the dialogue. Like Elliott's "The Quick and the Dead," there's breathtaking cinematography (the jungle in this case) and a mature approach, not to mention Paris' beauty, emphasized in an understated, tasteful way.

    There's an undeniable bond between Mike Kardec and Helen Lacklan, which is obvious to the husband (and reminiscent of "Shane"). Perhaps you can relate: You stumble across someone of the opposite sex and instinctively sense a palpable connection, some kind of profound mutual fascination, yet - for whatever reason - pursuing an intimate relationship is not an option. In an entire lifetime you will only experience a handful such 'connections,' or less. These exchanges are permanent because they are so potent they are forever burned into your psyche. The movie showcases this well.

    Also, it's nice to see Billy Zane as the protagonist for a change (after his effective portrayals of villains in "Dead Calm" and "Titanic"). He's quite good in the part. As for Keith Carradine as the pompous American husband, I'm glad he wasn't made out to be an over-the-top villain. Instead, L'Amour made him a human being with flaws and attributes. Notice how Mike and John sit on the beach together in the final act, both wounded, having an honest talk and gazing at the woman they both adore.

    It runs 1 hour, 29 minutes, and was shot in Queensland, Australia, including the Old Government House in Brisbane.

    GRADE: B-/B.
    Helpful•0
    0
    The High Commissioner

    The High Commissioner

    6.1
    7
  • May 29, 2025
  • Realistic alternative to 60's James Bond

    An Australian detective (Rod Taylor) is sent to London to bring back the High Commissioner (Christopher Plummer) for a possible crime in 1951, but he's involved in delicate peace talks for the UN, not to mention dealing with a leaker and assassination attempts.

    "The High Commissioner" (1968) is also known as "Nobody Runs Forever" and works well enough if you're interested in a way more believable, dialogue-driven substitute to the 007 flicks with Sean Connery. Clive Revill is entertaining as a grumpy butler while suave Calvin Lockhart is notable as an American involved in the diplomatic proceedings.

    Exotic-looking Daliah Lavi stands out on the feminine front. Her character is involved in an unconvincing romantic sequence, which wasn't in the 1966 novel (the creators obviously wanted to spice up the story for moviegoers). Camilla Sparv and Lilli Palmer are also on hand.

    There's something too mechanical about the movie. The director described himself as a "hired hand" and brushed it off as "okay." I wouldn't pay top dollar at the cinema to see it, but it's enjoyable enough for home entertainment if you're in the mood for a talky 60's big city drama/thriller with lots of political intrigue and a quality cast.

    This was the first of two movies featuring Aussie detective Scobie Malone; the other came out in 1975 and was titled "Scobie Malone," minus Rod Taylor in the role.

    It runs 1 hour, 41 minutes, and was shot at Pinewood Studios, west of London, as well as in the city, including Wimbledon. There are also shots of Sydney and the opening sequence appears to have been shot in the Outback.

    GRADE: B/B-
    Helpful•0
    0
    The Munsters' Revenge

    The Munsters' Revenge

    5.9
    7
  • May 28, 2025
  • The second Munsters movie, fifteen years after the first

    Herman and Grandpa are taken into custody in Los Angeles with the crimes they're accused of verified by several eyewitnesses. They trace their troubles to the owner of a wax museum (Sid Caesar).

    "The Munsters' Revenge" (1981) is the second and final Munsters movie to feature the three key cast members, Fred Gwynne, Al Lewis and Yvonne De Carlo. Eddie is played by a lookalike actor since the original actor was obviously too old by this point.

    Meanwhile Marilyn is replaced for the third time by blonde Jo McDonnell, who happens to be the best actress in the role, at least up to this point (I haven't seen the two Munsters movies from 1995 and 1996). Marilyn's role here is bigger than usual and Jo is a highlight. At one point, she even disguises herself as the wax museum's resident cave girl (played by Rachel Sorteberg).

    Other highlights include Herman's inadvertent destruction of a police precinct and what happens to Igor when he & Grandpa visit the latter's old haunts in Transylvania, not to mention what happens to the Pharaoh's mummy at the end. Then there's newbie Cousin Phantom (of the Opera). As with the TV series and first movie, "Munster, Go Home!," it's the charm of Gwynne & Lewis and their camaraderie that makes anything with them in it amusing and endearing.

    I favor this flick over the first one simply because there seems to be more entertaining highpoints. Speaking of which, don't miss out on Rob Zombie's underrated origin movie from 2022, which I loved.

    It runs 1 hour, 36 minutes, and was shot at Universal Studios in the Los Angeles area.

    GRADE: B.
    Helpful•0
    0
    See all reviews

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb app
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb app
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb app
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.