data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad74c/ad74c0a979b468ea6e00750681db8495461bb645" alt="wittmann73's profile image"
wittmann73
Joined Aug 2005
Welcome to the new profile
We're still working on updating some profile features. To see the badges, ratings breakdowns, and polls for this profile, please go to the previous version.
Ratings1.4K
wittmann73's rating
Reviews32
wittmann73's rating
I am a huge fan of the first part, the second one was decent, but this one was a huge disappointment. Hard to believe the same star and director were involved in this. The main problem is that this third installment is incredibly slow and lacks action, esp. When compared to the first Equalizer movie.
That 80% of the film was in Italian with subtitles did not help.
There are only three very short action scenes in this, one at the beginning, one in the middle and one at the end. Nothing about them is exciting or special. Most of the time you see Denzel sitting at a table drinking tea or walking around a nice Italian city. The villains are totally generic and forgettable. The sub-plot with a young female CIA agent is unnecessary.
What left me thinking was why was everyone in this Italian city so nice towards Denzel´s character, although they did not know him at all? Why did the doctor help him and did not report him? Why did the policeman help him, why did he not search his car or did any background check?
The idea of McCall going against the Italian mafia sounded so cool and promising, but the outcome was disappointing. Maybe Fuqua and Denzel just wanted to have a nice holiday in Italy.
That 80% of the film was in Italian with subtitles did not help.
There are only three very short action scenes in this, one at the beginning, one in the middle and one at the end. Nothing about them is exciting or special. Most of the time you see Denzel sitting at a table drinking tea or walking around a nice Italian city. The villains are totally generic and forgettable. The sub-plot with a young female CIA agent is unnecessary.
What left me thinking was why was everyone in this Italian city so nice towards Denzel´s character, although they did not know him at all? Why did the doctor help him and did not report him? Why did the policeman help him, why did he not search his car or did any background check?
The idea of McCall going against the Italian mafia sounded so cool and promising, but the outcome was disappointing. Maybe Fuqua and Denzel just wanted to have a nice holiday in Italy.
Ok, the first 2 seasons were atrocious. I was so disappointed.
But after positive reviews for Season 3 I gave it another shot. And I am glad I did! Season 3 feels like a whole new show, like TNG "good old times".
So if you gave up on the show after the first two seasons, give it another try, you will not be disappointed.
Action, emotions, story, our childhood heroes ... it finally feels like Star Trek again. Thank you, Jonathan Frakes!
Season One and Two: 2 stars
Season Three: 7 stars.
I need a few more words, so I just repeat my message. Give S3 a try if you liked TNG, you wont regret it. And forget the first two seasons.
But after positive reviews for Season 3 I gave it another shot. And I am glad I did! Season 3 feels like a whole new show, like TNG "good old times".
So if you gave up on the show after the first two seasons, give it another try, you will not be disappointed.
Action, emotions, story, our childhood heroes ... it finally feels like Star Trek again. Thank you, Jonathan Frakes!
Season One and Two: 2 stars
Season Three: 7 stars.
I need a few more words, so I just repeat my message. Give S3 a try if you liked TNG, you wont regret it. And forget the first two seasons.
Making established male characters like Sherlock Holmes look dumb so that your new, female character looks super-smart and capable is the laziest screenwriting possible. Dear feminists and wokists, please invent your own characters and keep your dirty hands off established male characters.
Making established male characters like Sherlock Holmes look dumb so that your new, female character looks super-smart and capable is the laziest screenwriting possible. Dear feminists and wokists, please invent your own characters and keep your dirty hands off established male characters.
Thank you very much.
Making established male characters like Sherlock Holmes look dumb so that your new, female character looks super-smart and capable is the laziest screenwriting possible. Dear feminists and wokists, please invent your own characters and keep your dirty hands off established male characters.
Thank you very much.