BUS1099: Assignment # 1 Rubric – Project Charter (15%) Team2021-06-01

7
Assignment Due Date: May 25th @ 11:59PM Late Penalty: 2 points per day late to maximum of 50% of assignment grade.

Assignment formatting (3 Marks for each Criteria) Marks

Uses Title Page as per Template provided in Moodle No spelling or grammar errors.

Table of Contents created using MS Word "Table of Contents" Feature Consistent formatting of all forms 12.0
Page Numbering located in page footer, page number starts at 1 on the page
Professional-looking submission, ready for publishing
immediately after the Table of Contents
Expectations Not Met Approaching Expectations Meets Expectations Possible
Grading Criteria Marks Level Notes
(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Points

Demonstrates understanding of the form's Demonstrates complete understanding of the

Project Charter Template Includes a Project Charter. 1
Includes a Project Charter using BoF 1.1. purpose and knowledge of individual fields.
form's purpose and knowledge of individual fields. 3 2.25 Level 3 Incorrect headings on some columns (ie. Project Objectives)

The project purpose was masterfully understood

Inability to communicate the basic and communicated. The description was in
Project Purpose purpose of the project. Goals are
unclear.
business terms, not in technical terms. Any reader 3 2.25 Level 3 "Sales pitch" or wordy intro into the project purpose.
would be able to clearly understand the purpose of
the project without confusion.

The group showed an ability to describe the project

High Level Project Description
in a concise manner 3 1.50 Level 2 Confusing project description

The group understood and communicated the

boundaries of the project exceptionally well,
Project Boundaries including the boundaries of the scope as well as 3 3.00 Level 4 Clear understanding of boundaries
limitations on other knowledge areas.
Critical thinking was applied.

A correct list of the key deliverables was provided.

Critical thinking was displayed in the generation of
Key Deliverables
the list of deliverables. Current enterprise 3 3.00 Level 4 Clear deliverables
environmental factors were considered.

The key features, functions, and conditions were

communicated accurately and clearly. Critical
High Level Requirements thinking was displayed in the generation of the 3 3.00 Level 4
requirements. Current enterprise environmental
factors were considered.

Underlying risks that may impact the success of the

project. They could be political, social, economic,
Overall Project Risk and technical, volatility, uncertainty, complexity 2 1.50 Level 3 Nice categorization of risk. Clear impact of each risk.
Critical thinking was displayed, and current
enterprise environmental factors were considered.

The group displayed an understanding of the scope

Scope
and identified success criteria. 3 2.25 Level 3

The group displayed an understanding of the time

Time
and began applying key deadlines. 3 3.00 Level 4

The group displayed an understanding of the order

Cost
of magnitude of cost. 2 2.00 Level 4

This summary helps inform the schedule baseline,

Summary milesone schedule
detailed in the project management plan 3 3.00 Level 4

The project team displayed an insightful

Preapproved Financial Resources understanding of funding mechanism for the 2 1.50 Level 3
project.

An overview of at 5 key stakeholders and their roles Other stakeholders are project team, regulatory agencies for
Key stakeholder list
were identified. 3 2.25 Level 3
approving safety of trailer

The performance, metrics, conditions or other

measurements that must be met to conclude for
Exit Criteria/Acceptance Criteria project to be accepted were clearly measurable.
The metrics are relevant to the project.
3 2.25 Level 3 Good examples, except "Milestone reached"… too ambiguous

Critical thinking was displayed.

Page 1 of 2
 BUS1099: Assignment # 1 Rubric – Project Charter (15%) Team2021-06-01
7
Assignment Due Date: May 25th @ 11:59PM Late Penalty: 2 points per day late to maximum of 50% of assignment grade.

The levels of authority have been delineated within

the project so that there are no overlapping roles.
Project Manager Authority Level
Critical thinking was applied, and actual staff 5 5.00 Level 4
members on this project will be considered.

7 or more spelling and grammar issues 5-7 spelling and grammar issues found in 0-2 spelling and grammar issues found in the report
2-5 spelling and grammar issues found in the
Submission Quality: Spelling/Grammar found in the report that resulted in the report that resulted in diminished that resulted in diminished clarify. The report was
and Overall Readability/Understanding diminished clarity. Report was clarify. Report was difficult to
report that resulted in diminished clarify.
Report was clear and understandable.
eloquently written for enhanced readability and 3 2.25 Level 3
unclear/difficult to understand. understand in places. understanding.

Final deliverable was formatted into one cohesive

document. All content to be marked was properly
Final deliverables were partially
Submission Process: Formatting, Final deliverable was not formatted Final deliverables were mostly consolidated consolidated and is easy to read. Title Page, page
Communication, Submission into one cohesive document.
consolidated into one cohesive
into one cohesive document. orientation(s), page numbering utilized effectively. 3 3.00 Level 4
document.
College resources were effectively used.
Submission was performed through Moodle.

Content to be marked was not properly The deliverable quality was of high quality that
Some formatting inconsistencies made Minor formatting inconsistencies made the Overflow of some numbers in tables, taable titles on one page
Submission Quality consolidated and improper formatting
made difficult to read.
the document difficult to read document difficult to read in some places.
could be distributed to a third party without any 2 1.50 Level 3 with the data on another. Otherwise exceptional
refinements.
The deliverable quality is well below The deliverable quality is below the
The deliverable quality is almost of the quality
Overall Deliverable Quality the acceptable quality to be distributed acceptable quality to be distributed to a
to a third party.
to be distributed to a third party.
(This means you did an exceptional job). 3 2.25 Level 3
third party.
Demonstrates understanding of the log's
Includes an assumption log and 1 purpose, with knowledge of individual fields Assumption log is fully updated with status of each I like the fact that most assumptions were beyond the Project
Includes an Assumption Log demonstrates basic understanding of Includes an Assumption Log using BoF 10 10.00 Level 4
1.2 on the log and understanding of what an assumption Team's control
assumptions.
assumption is.
Full details of each team members
Includes details of how each team Thorough use of MS Project, Clockify or Basecamp
Group Activity Log Incomplete log
member contributed
contribution. Does not report all team
members all doing the same tasks.
for tracking individual team member's work 10 7.50 Level 3 Not clear on individual hours spent.

1 - BoF: The Project Manager’s Book of forms TOTAL (/93) 93 76.25 82.0%

Page 2 of 2