Navigating the complexities of a literature review can often feel like traversing a labyrinth of

scholarly articles, theories, and research methodologies. This rings particularly true when delving into
the realm of Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS). Crafting a comprehensive literature review
demands not only an extensive understanding of the subject matter but also a keen eye for
synthesizing diverse sources to construct a coherent narrative.

The process of writing a literature review on CDSS involves exhaustive research, meticulous analysis,
and critical thinking. Scholars and researchers must sift through a vast array of academic papers,
journals, and books to identify relevant literature. Moreover, they must evaluate the quality and
credibility of each source, discerning between seminal works and tangential studies.

Once the literature is gathered, the arduous task of synthesizing the information begins. Writers must
identify recurring themes, trends, and gaps in the existing literature while providing insightful
commentary and analysis. This synthesis requires not only a deep understanding of the subject matter
but also the ability to critically evaluate and compare different perspectives and methodologies.

Furthermore, writing a literature review demands clarity, coherence, and conciseness. Authors must
adeptly organize their findings, present a logical flow of ideas, and adhere to academic writing
conventions. Proper citation and referencing are also paramount to maintaining academic integrity
and acknowledging the contributions of other scholars in the field.

Given the complexity and challenges inherent in crafting a literature review on CDSS, many
individuals find themselves overwhelmed by the task. In such instances, seeking professional
assistance can be invaluable. ⇒ [Link] ⇔ offers a reliable solution for those in need of
expert guidance and support. With a team of experienced writers well-versed in the intricacies of
literature review writing, ⇒ [Link] ⇔ ensures the delivery of high-quality, customized
content tailored to meet the specific needs of each client.

By entrusting your literature review needs to ⇒ [Link] ⇔, you can alleviate the burden of
this daunting task and rest assured that your academic endeavors are in capable hands. Whether you
require assistance with research, analysis, or writing, ⇒ [Link] ⇔ is committed to helping
you achieve your academic goals. Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review impede your
progress – order from ⇒ [Link] ⇔ today and embark on your academic journey with
confidence.
OpenUrl PubMed 84. ? O'Donnell J, Gladden RM, Seth P. Crossref PubMed Elsaid K, Truong T,
Monckeberg M. Appendix A: electronic decision support activities in different healthcare settings in
Australia. As the leading medical software development company, we got the resources you need to
successfully develop a completely customized CDSS for your organization. As a result, the industry
can expect increased input from IoMT devices (such as wireless sensors or wearable s technologies),
including genetic, microbiome, or proteomic information, and precision medicine. CONSENT 16
years 4 months 10 days 14 hours These cookies are set via embedded youtube-videos. Effects of
computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a
systematic review. Weak systems of recent decades are gradually being replaced by solutions with
service-oriented interfaces and architectures, improved analytics with open standards to ensure
interoperability with as many systems as possible. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 55. ? Colquhoun HL,
Levac D, O'Brien KK, et al. The differences in health outcomes between Web-based and paper-
based implementation of a clinical pathway for radical nephrectomy. Results: Electronic database
searches yielded 2,439 potentially eligible papers, with 24 studies included after final review. These
funders did not play a role in the design, execution, analysis, or publication of this study. A scoping
review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research. The
differences in health outcomes between Web-based and paper-based implementation of a clinical
pathway for radical nephrectomy. Published reports in the peer-reviewed literature were identified,
and all abstracts were reviewed for eligibility. Structuring and analyzing this clinical information
allows determining which treatments are more effective, improving the quality of services. Effect of
computerisation on the quality and safety of chemotherapy prescription. The impact of health
information technology on cancer care across the continuum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
However, one study in our analysis showed that there was an increase in pharmacist order review
time without any impact on intervention rates. 21 This finding underlines the potential for CDS
systems to have a negative impact on care delivery, and demonstrates the importance of a thorough
evaluation of these tools as a part of system implementation. Optimizing pain treatment interventions
(OPTI): A pilot randomized controlled trial of collaborative care to improve chronic pain
management and opioid safety-rationale, methods, and lessons learned. Overdose and prescribed
opioids: Associations among chronic non-cancer pain patients. Crossref PubMed Adeboyeje G, Agiro
A, Malin J. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site
usage for the site's analytics report. The data collected including the number visitors, the source
where they have come from, and the pages visted in an anonymous form. Opioid Prescribing in rural
family practices: A qualitative study. But complex training, the need for large datasets, and a lack of
interpretability hampered their widespread adoption. Combining these components will create a full-
spectrum system that drives value and optimizes the quality of healthcare. We also found that few
CDSSs included evidence-based components and that in only 1 study investigators reported
following current guidance for development and evaluation of complex interventions. 35, 36 Our
finding that there were only 14 studies, and only 1 RCT, which met our inclusion criteria is
surprising. Using an enhanced oral chemotherapy computerized provider order entry system to
reduce prescribing errors and improve safety. For instance, these tools include reminders and tools
for patients as well as doctors.
Time to review the role of surrogate end points in health policy: State of the art and the way forward.
A multistep approach to address clinician knowledge, attitudes, and behavior around opioid
prescribing. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance
and patient outcomes: a systematic review. The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in
the process of care: a systematic review. To learn more about the different cookies we're using, check
out our Cookie Policy Do not sell my personal information. It can filter the data to present it at the
right time, promising improved healthcare. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 14, 70.
All in all, these are just some of the examples of clinical decision support tools. For this, advanced
algorithms for image classification are used, primarily deep learning (DL). Opioid dose and drug-
related mortality in patients with nonmalignant pain. Crossref PubMed Patkar V, Acosta D,
Davidson T. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. Although the prototype
outperformed the staff in its accuracy, they did not embed it into practice because of poor
performance and ethical and legal concerns. J Gen Intern Med 2015; S81. 35. ? Craig P, Dieppe P,
Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization
of Care Review Group. Healthcare providers will use AI as the most reliable tool for analyzing
patient data in the EHR to strengthen clinical decision support across all stages of care.
Development and validation of a computer program using Bayes’s theorem to support diagnosis of
rheumatic disorders. That being said, this high pressure on the medical facilities leaves space open
for medical errors. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in
Crisis. Also, the errors can be appropriately reported to enhance healthcare services. Multidisciplinary
pain management based on a computerized clinical decision support system in cancer pain patients.
For example, it provides additional available resources that a physician can get from a link if more
information is required. Evaluating consensus among physicians in medical knowledge base
construction. [Link]. Available at:. Accessed September 13, 2018. PubMed U.S. National
Library of Medicine. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the
user profile. Crossref PubMed Ruland CM, White T, Stevens M. Some healthcare facilities have
experimented by making it a mobile app (it works fine either way). A statewide prescription
monitoring program affects emergency department prescribing behaviors. OpenUrl CrossRef
PubMed 26. ? Roshanov PS, Fernandes N, Wilczynski JM, et al. The data sources utilized by the
decision support system also include the EHRs, relational information source, revenue forecast, and
sales forecasts.
For this reason, using CDSS seems like a better option but considering its pros and cons is essential,
such as. An analysis of bone metastases pathway in a large, integrated National Cancer Institute-
Designated Comprehensive Cancer Center Network. Effects of computerized physician order entry
and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. To the authors’
knowledge, this is the first systematic review of available publications to inform eCDST
implementation in primary care for the diagnosis of cancer. The high-quality and real-time analytics
offered by the system was able to alert healthcare practitioners to make a timely diagnosis for sepsis,
as well as, give timely reminders for the best treatment options for deadly conditions. The opioid
manager: a point-of-care tool to facilitate the use of the Canadian Opioid Guideline. CDSS also
alerts the clinicians on time which helps reduce the healthcare costs while improving the efficiency
standards. The results of the coronary health assessment study (CHAS). Cheesbrough Research
Chair in Family and Community Medicine; AS was supported by a graduate research award from the
University of Toronto, Department of Family and Community Medicine and a research fellowship
from the Medical Psychiatry Alliance, University of Toronto; QG was supported by a graduate
research award from the Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of
Toronto. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified four of these features as independent
predictors of a system's ability to improve clinical practice. In Szolovits P, ed. Artificial Intelligence
in Medicine. The Effects of Clinical Decision Support Systems on Medication Safety: An Overview.
However, we do not believe this was the case, as our findings are consistent with our previous
experiences of implementing clinical decision support systems in practice. In contrast, GPs had
different interpretations of how and when the eCDSTs should be used, with some using it with
patients who were asymptomatic Clinician buy-in was identified as one of the limiting factors to
successful implementation; disconnection and mistrust of the eCDST occurred when the
recommendations conflicted with the GP’s intuition or clinical judgement. The art of diagnosis:
solving the clinicopatho-logical conference. The development of primary care information
technology in the United Kingdom. Diss Abstr Int Sect B Sci Eng 2016; 64: 52. ? Chaudhary S,
Compton P. Opportunities for a better use of healthcare resources. Interventions that increase use of
adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. This is possible if data
standardization is not compromised and allows users to have reasonable control over their
interactions with the system. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 28. ? Holstiege J, Mathes T, Pieper D.
Crossref PubMed Clauser SB, Wagner EH, Aiello Bowles EJ. The group system focuses on
supporting decision-making teams to analyze and solve decision-making ussies. Crossref PubMed
Meisenberg BR, Wright RR, Brady-Copertino CJ. Available from:. 61. ? Liebschutz JM, Xuan Z,
Shanahan CW, et al. He started from managing small teams, and now he assembles an expert team
of more than 40 software developers. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-
analyses: the PRISMA statement. Available from:. 68. ? McCarthy M. Containing the opioid
overdose epidemic. General purpose platform session cookies that are used to maintain users' state
across page requests. Strecher VJ, O'Malley MS, Villagra VG, Campbell EE, Gonzalez JJ, Irons TG,
et al.
Available from:. 46. ? Rutkow L, Smith KC, Lai AY, Vernick JS, Davis CS, Alexander GC. The
authors would also like to acknowledge Mandy Fraser, Amanda Lacy, and Lauryn Davin, who
provided technical assistance during the literature review process and with manuscript preparation
and submission. It does everything by analyzing the data to deliver the prompts and alerts, promising
high-end patient care and improved decision-making. References 1. ? Fischer B, Keates A,
Buhringer G, Reimer J, Rehm J. As a result, all of these examples prove the benefits of clinical
decision support systems and solidify the fact that this must be used in the world of medicine.
Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient
outcomes: A systematic review. Assessment of efficiency and safety of the comprehensive
Chemotherapy Assistance Program for ordering oncology medications. Clinical decision support
systems for improving diagnostic accuracy and achieving precision medicine. The subset analyses for
computer based clinical decision support systems and for non-electronic clinical decision support
systems yielded results consistent with the findings of the primary regression analysis ( table 6 ).
GPs reviewed the records of patients who were flagged and decided on further clinical management
Patients flagged and needing further review 34% Percentage of CRC diagnosis in patients who were
flagged 1.2% Moderate risk Logan et al (2002) 26 Laboratory computers were programmed to print
a decision prompt based on blood indices on the FBC report received by GPs. Also, the information
provided will be quick and accurate, promising better healthcare decision-making. Novel opioid
safety clinic initiative to deliver guideline-concordant chronic opioid therapy in primary care. In
addition, in 4 studies the evaluators were also the CDSS developers, a potentially useful situation,
but one that presents a potential conflict of interest, 26, 27 that was not addressed by the
investigators. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance
and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Secondly, we generated the candidate set of potentially
important system features by systematically reviewing the literature for relevant expert opinion,
rather than by relying on the views of a limited set of experts. Computer-based guideline
implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness. NOTE: We only
request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you
wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. Effects of a computerized system to support
shared decision making in symptom management of cancer patients: preliminary results. Built-in
toolsets such as alerts, reminders, and templates also raise the overall quality of service. With the 15
system features and the three environmental factors constituting the potential explanatory variables,
we conducted logistic regression analyses using LogXact-5. 59 Independent predictor variables were
included into the final models using forward selection and a significance level of 0.05. None of the
studies assessed the impact of CDS systems on patient survival. Figure 1: Clinical decision support
rationale (Okumura et al., 2016). It is worth noticing that along with dosing and administration
intervals, it is essential to consider the factor of drug-to-drug interactions (at the “Adequate dosing”
stage). Past and present CDDSS incorporate inexact models of the incompletely understood and
exceptionally complex process of clinical diagnosis. Six studies examined local (eg, health center)
CDSSs and 8 examined prescription drug monitoring program CDSSs. A consensus statement on
considerations for a successful CPOE implementation. Effects of computer-based clinical decision
support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. In addition, it
offers reminders regarding preventive medical care and also provides alerts regarding drug issues.
The differences in health outcomes between Web-based and paper-based implementation of a clinical
pathway for radical nephrectomy. Crossref PubMed Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA. Some of
the benefits of clinical decision support system (CDSS) includes.
Can residents be trained to counsel patients about quitting smoking. All trigger-positive records were
initially considered to be high risk for delayed diagnostic evaluation. Crossref PubMed Harris AD,
McGregor JC, Perencevich EN. Some other examples of CDSS in healthcare and CDSS tools
include the fact that this tool is designed to sort out the digital information for providing on-time
alerts and treatments. Health systems were called on to optimize CDS to improve the quality of
healthcare services and health in the United States. CDSSs developed before this period likely
evolved or became obsolete. 59 We built a comprehensive search strategy, including the terms
“opioid,” and “clinical decision support systems.” Since studies used a large number of different
keywords and medical subject headings for a CDSS, we had to conduct a broad search using a large
variety of terms, including computer systems, health informatics, clinical decision-making (
Appendix 1 Medline search strategy). New York, NY: Elsevier Computer Science Library, Artificial
Intelligence Series, 1976. BMC Fam Pract 2015; 16: 48. OpenUrl 73. ? Finley EP, Garcia A, Rosen
K, McGeary D, Pugh MJ, Potter JS. Kowamoto et al 8 identified features of CDS systems critical
for improving clinical practice in any clinical setting, including (1) automatic provision of decision
support as part of clinician workflow; (2) provision of recommendations compared with assessments;
(3) provision of decision support at the time and location of decision-making; and (4) computer-
based decision support. An additional limitation is that our analyses were restricted to features that
could be reliably abstracted. Appendix A: electronic decision support activities in different
healthcare settings in Australia. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. They can also
be used to improve prescribing and other measures, like risk mitigation strategies for patients already
receiving opioids for CNCP. Crossref PubMed Castaneda C, Nalley K, Mannion C. Results: Our
search yielded 5068 records, of which 14 studies met our inclusion criteria. Whereas DSS, driven by
communication, enables collaboration, coordination, and communication among people working on a
shared task. For optimal retrieval, all terms were supplemented with relevant title and text words.
Tables Figures How this fits in Electronic clinical decision support tools (eCDSTs) improve
practitioner performance and patient care, but their role in cancer diagnosis has not been adequately
addressed. Crossref PubMed Bright TJ, Wong A, Dhurjati R. The input for the system was the
clinical notes, bedside monitors, and other supplementary data. Selective publication of
antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. This won’t just help the organizations to
implement the CDS system effectively and integrate it with the existing systems and processes, but
also gives an opportunity to train the internal resources with the complexities and technicalities
involved in developing, implementing, and maintaining the clinical decision support system. The
prescription opioid crisis only gained widespread attention in the last decade, 68 and it takes time to
develop a complex intervention like a CDSS. 36 It is also possible that some CDSSs failed to show
promise early on and development was subsequently stalled or halted. Crossref PubMed Roshanov
PS, Fernandes N, Wilczynski JM. Restoring invisible and abandoned trials: A call for people to
publish the findings. Crossref PubMed Clauser SB, Wagner EH, Aiello Bowles EJ. This is used to
present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile. Overdose and
prescribed opioids: Associations among chronic non-cancer pain patients. How effective are clinical
pathways with and without online peer-review. OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed 9. ? Gomes T, Mamdani
MM, Dhalla IA, Paterson JM, Juurlink DN.
However, there is a critical need to rigorously evaluate CDS systems in oncology to better
understand how they can be implemented to improve patient outcomes. Of these 22 features, 15
could be included into our analysis ( table 1 ) because their presence or absence could be reliably
abstracted from most studies, whereas the remaining seven could not ( table 2 ). OpenUrl CrossRef
PubMed 81. ? Compton WM, Jones CM, Baldwin GT. Conclusions To date, few studies have
evaluated CDS systems in oncology practice. No study reported any system in place to monitor and
adapt the eCDST to ensure sustainability over time. BMC Fam Pract 2015; 16: 48. OpenUrl 73. ?
Finley EP, Garcia A, Rosen K, McGeary D, Pugh MJ, Potter JS. Two investigators reviewed each
title and abstract for potential inclusion. Rapid Development of specialty population registries and
quality measures from electronic health record data: An agile framework. These systems increase the
level of control over operations and planning by assessing the significance of uncertainties and trade-
offs in choosing alternatives. Clinical application of two computerized diabetes management
systems: comparison with the log-book method. Automatic collection and display of newly available
data (not yet entered the EMR) are required to complete the clinical picture. Physician order entry: a
mixed blessing to pharmacy. MA, DPhil, MRCGP, FRACGP Roles: Herman professor of primary
care cancer research Find this author on Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for this
author on this site. These funders did not play a role in the design, execution, analysis, or publication
of this study. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention 2017. 97. ? Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker
M, et al. Computerised advice on drug dosage to improve prescribing practice. Empirical evidence
for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published
articles. The development of primary care information technology in the United Kingdom. The
impact of health information technology on cancer care across the continuum: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Opportunities for a better use of healthcare resources. Used to track the
information of the embedded YouTube videos on a website. Multidisciplinary intervention decreases
the use of opioid medication discharge packs from 2 urban EDs. The data sources utilized by the
decision support system also include the EHRs, relational information source, revenue forecast, and
sales forecasts. Study aims and designs are summarized in Table 2 and described in detail in
Appendix 3. Thirdly, we used two independent reviewers for study selection and data abstraction to
increase the reliability of our findings. Clinical reporting to primary care physicians leads to increased
use and understanding of bone densitometry and affects the management of osteoporosis. Audit and
feedback versus alternative strategies: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. This
cookie is used to save the user's preferences when playing embedded videos from Vimeo. We used
the control-system comparisons to identify system features statistically associated with successful
outcomes and the system-system comparisons to identify features with direct experimental evidence
of their importance. Crossref PubMed Elsaid K, Truong T, Monckeberg M.
The differences in health outcomes between Web-based and paper-based implementation of a
clinical pathway for radical nephrectomy. Second, several of the studies included both PCPs and
other provider types (we excluded those with less than 50% PCPs), and, as these studies only
reported aggregate outcomes, they may not accurately reflect the PCP population. Quick Medical
Reference (QMR) for diagnostic assistance. The authors would also like to acknowledge Mandy
Fraser, Amanda Lacy, and Lauryn Davin, who provided technical assistance during the literature
review process and with manuscript preparation and submission. Symptom monitoring with patient-
reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Crossref PubMed
Voeffray M, Pannatier A, Stupp R. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Cardiovascular diseases.
This is problematic, and as a recent criminal case demonstrated, can lead to potential harm to
patients. 93 We found that few of the CDSSs incorporated evidence-based design components.
Does a fixed physician reminder system improve the care of patients with coronary artery disease.
Funding and Relationship between Developers and Evaluators Discussion We identified 14 studies
published between 2009 and 2019 that examined CDSSs for opioid prescribing for CNCP in primary
care clinical settings. Also, if a factor was designated as a barrier to effectiveness (such as “the need
for clinician data entry limits system effectiveness”) we treated the logically opposite concept as a
potential success factor (such as “removing the need for clinician data entry enhances system
effectiveness”). At a health-system level, the prompts for referral placed extra pressure on secondary
care There was limited evidence about how GPs monitored and adapted the new interventions over
time. The impact of health information technology on cancer care across the continuum: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent
efficacy. The data sources utilized by the decision support system also include the EHRs, relational
information source, revenue forecast, and sales forecasts. Inclusion criteria: study of a CDSS for
opioid prescribing for CNCP in a primary care clinical setting. Findings from the limited studies
included in this review are largely positive and consistent with most studies conducted in the general
healthcare population. Identifying barriers to the effective use of clinical reminders: Bootstrapping
multiple methods. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician
performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. He started from managing small teams, and
now he assembles an expert team of more than 40 software developers. Study Eligibility We
included peer-reviewed and nonpeer-reviewed studies that used quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-
methods methodologies. We excluded nonsystematic reviews, letters, opinion articles, analysis
articles, clinical practice guidelines, and policy documents. Computerized clinical decision support
systems for drug prescribing and management: A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic
review. Results: Our search yielded 5068 records, of which 14 studies met our inclusion criteria.
Currently available data suggest that these systems can have a positive impact on the quality of
cancer care delivery. This won’t just help the organizations to implement the CDS system effectively
and integrate it with the existing systems and processes, but also gives an opportunity to train the
internal resources with the complexities and technicalities involved in developing, implementing, and
maintaining the clinical decision support system. Screening and Selection Two researchers
independently screened abstracts to determine whether they met inclusion criteria. With the usage of
CDSS, data mining can be used for examining the patient’s medical background with research to
predict the potential of diseases. Studies that reported less than 50% PCPs or did not report the
percentage of PCPs were excluded, unless results were reported by subgroup. Your current browser
may not support copying via this button.