English Tenses for ESL Learners
English Tenses for ESL Learners
The Present Continuous is used when we talk about something which is happening now (or around
now).
🌟 3. temporary actions
► Verbs that express states are normally not used with the Present Progressive. If they are used, watch
the difference in meaning.
🌟 5. trends
♦️More and more people are using their computers to listen to music.
🌟 6. repeated actions which are irritating to the speaker (especially with always, constantly, forever)
Unit 2
Further reading on the uses of the Simple Present Tense
🌟 2. things in general
♦️Honey is sweet.
4. sequence of actions in the present (first – then, after that) First I get up, then I have breakfast.
♦️
♦️After school I switch on my computer, then I check my emails and after that I play my favourite game.
🌟 5. instructions
🌟 6. with special verbs – which are normally not used with the Present Progressive (These verbs express
states, possessions, feelings etc.) be, believe, belong, hate, hear, like, love, mean, prefer, remain, realize,
see, seem, smell, think, understand, want, wish
🌟 8. in broadcast commentaries
In broadcast commentaries on sporting events, the simple present tense is used instead of the present
continuous tense to talk about activities in progress.
🌟We use the Present Simple Tense when we want to talk about fixed habits or routines – things that
don’t change. (permenent situation)
♦️I live in the countryside. (Permanently / in general / all the time / this action/fact won't change or
finish).
🌟We use the Present Continuous Tense to talk about actions which are happening at (or around) the
present moment, but will soon finish. (temporary situation)
♦️I am living in the city. (Temporarily / currently / only for a period of time / this action/fact will change
or finish soon).
We can use "always / constantly / continuously / continually / forever and other similar adverbs" with
the Present Continuous to show our ANNOYANCE / ANGER / COMPLAINING because of something that
happens regularly.
♦️She always comes late. (we are just stating a fact about her without telling what we feel about that
habit)
♦️She is always coming late. (we are stating a fact about her and expressing our annoyance of this habit)
♦️Christina always leaves her dirty clothes on the floor. (this a fact about her / we have no
♦️Christina is always leaving her dirty clothes on the floor for me to pick up! Who does she think I am?
Her maid? (We are very annoyed)
Non-continuous verbs are verbs that we do not normally use with continuous tenses. These "stative"
verbs are about state, not action, and they cannot express the continuous or progressive aspect. Here
are some of the most common non-continuous verbs:
♦️Sense♦️
♦️Communication♦️
♦️Other States♦️
Be - I'm a teacher.
a. On Sunday, my brother and I went to a nice lake. There, we met our friends. We swam in the warm
water and played volleyball in the afternoon. Too bad that we had to go home in the evening. We didn't
want to go to school on Monday.
♦️6. in the second conditional, to express unreal or imaginary situations that may not happen:
♦️7. together with the Past Progressive/Continuous – the Simple Past interrupted an action which was in
progress in the past:
♦️8. when a sentence contains two clauses in the past simple, REMEMBER that the "when-clause"
happened first before the second clause:
a. When I arrived, the teacher started the lesson. (I arrived first, then the teacher started the lesson)
b. I arrived when the lesson finished. (First, the lesson was finished, then I arrived).
♦️1. an action GOING ON at some time in the past (the time of the action may or may not be indicated):
a. It was getting darker.
♦️2. to indicate that a longer action in the past was interrupted by a shorter action. The older and longer
action is in the past continuous and the newer and shorter one is in the past simple. (Remember this can
be a real interruption or just an interruption in time):
♦️3. for persistent habits in the past (to concentrate more on the continuity of the habits that they were
more than usual):
♦️4. Parallel Actions: (When you use the past continuous with two actions in the same sentence, it
expresses the idea that both actions were happening at the same time or simultaneously):
b. They were eating dinner, discussing their plans, and having a good time.
♦️5. Atmosphere or Background actions (We often use the past continuous to describe the atmosphere
or background actions at a particular time in the past):
b. When I walked into the office, several people were busily typing, some were talking on the phones,
the boss was yelling directions, and customers were waiting to be helped.
♦️6. Repetition and Irritation with "Always": (The past continuous with words such as "always" or
"constantly" expresses the idea that something irritating or shocking often happened in the past. The
concept is very similar to the expression "used to" but with negative emotion) (See also: using "always"
with the Present Continuous):
a. She has just gone out. (She is out now, not at home!)
b. I have just eaten. (I don't feel hungry now. I have just finished eating!)
♦️2. an action completed in the past whose effect lingers in the present (Here, we usually concentrate on
the effect (which can be still noticed in the present) more than the action itself (which happened in the
past):
a. Oh! I have cut my finger. (S/He may be bleeding now! A cut can clearly be seen in the finger)
b. She has not tidied her room yet. (Her room is not tidied. The room is totally messed up)
♦️3. We can also use the present perfect to talk about something that happened recently, even if there
isn't a clear result in the present. (This is common when we want to introduce news or new information.
(We often use the words 'just / yet / already / recently'.) However, the past simple is also correct in
these cases, especially in American English:
♦️4. unspecified time before now (We use the present perfect to say that an action happened at an
unspecified time before now. (The exact time is not important)
(Notice: You CANNOT use the present perfect with specific time expressions such as: yesterday, ago, last
week, or when I was a child, etc. But we CAN use the present perfect with unspecific expressions such
as: ever, never, once, many times, several times, before, so far, already, yet, etc.
♦️5. long actions which started in the near past and went on until very recently. (whether they are
finished or unfinished actions, states or even habits (we usually use stative verbs in this case and "since"
& "for" are often needed):
a. He has done a lot of interesting things in his life. (He is still alive)
♦️7. with an unfinished time word/phrase (this month, this week, today). The period of time is still
continuing:
a. I have not had any coffee this morning. (It is still morning)
a. I did not have any coffee this morning. (Maybe it's afternoon or evening now, but not morning)
b. Every country has developed its code of laws over hundreds or thousands of years.
♦️9. multiple actions at different times (We also use the present perfect to talk about several different
actions which have occurred in the past at different times. Present perfect suggests the process is not
complete and more actions are possible).
b. She has talked to several specialists about her problem, but nobody knows why she is sick.
♦️1. Unfinished Actions with concentrating on the Duration from the Past Until Now:
(We use the present perfect continuous to show that something started in the past and has continued
up until now. "For five minutes," "for two weeks," and "since Tuesday" are all durations which can be
used with the present perfect continuous.):
b. She has been working for that company for three years.
(Actions which have recently stopped (though the whole action can be unfinished) and have a result,
which we can often see, hear, or feel, in the present. We don't use a time word here.):
(We can also use the present perfect continuous WITHOUT a duration such as "for two weeks". Without
the duration, the tense has a more general meaning of "lately." We often use the words "lately" or
"recently" to emphasize this meaning.):
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
Remember that the present perfect continuous has the meaning of "lately" or "recently." So, if you use
the present perfect continuous in a question such as "Have you been feeling alright?", it can suggest that
the person looks sick or unhealthy. A question such as "Have you been smoking?" can suggest that you
smell the smoke on the person.
Using this tense in a question suggests you can see, smell, hear or feel the results of the action.
(We use the Present Perfect Continuous Tense for repeated actions to say for how long the action has
been occurring i.e. with mentioning the duration of repetition):
b. She has been going to school every morning for two months.
a. She has been writing a book. (focusing on the action of writing - the book may (not) have been
finished)
a. She has written a book. (focusing on the result - the book has been finished)
b. They’ve been negotiating the contract. (focusing on the action, it’s not important if it’s finished or not)
b. They’ve negotiated the contract. (focusing on the result, the negotiation has been finished)
(When the action/event is more temporary we often use present perfect continuous. When it is more
permanent we often use present perfect simple.):
Further reading on the differences between the Present Perfect Simple and Present Perfect Continuous
Tenses
Both sentences are correct and ALMOST mean the same thing. The only difference is that we use:
Remember!
(Present Perfect Continuous is used to focus on the action and not on the completion of the action. The
Present Perfect Simple, on the other hand, focuses on the completion and result of the action).
Further reading on the differences between the Present Perfect Simple and Present Perfect Continuous
Tenses
The tense is the Present Perfect Continuous Tense. The time phrase indicates the duration (five years).
The combination of the tense and the time phrase forces us to read it as: "I have been playing tennis for
five years now." This gives us the reading that the activity has been going on for five years up until now.
It also implies that the activity is likely to keep continuing, at least in the immediate future.
The tense is the Present Perfect Simple. The time phrase is, again, "for five years". However, the
sentence is different from (1). It doesn't force us to read the time part as "for five years up to now".
It's unclear exactly when exactly in the past the speaker has played tennis. All we know is that it
happened before now, at least five years but before now not up to now. (In other words, it's possible to
read the sentence as "At some point in my life, I've played tennis for five years.") It's unclear whether it
has ended or not. It's also possible that it's been continued up until now, and possibly will continue into
the future. The speaker says nothing explicitly, so we have a wider range of possible readings.
Having said that, the preferred reading, out of context, is: "I have played tennis for five years now."
Which means nearly the same thing as (1). When we read both alternatives as "for five years now", the
difference is very little. To demonstrate such a small difference, these examples can be helpful:
♦️(1) When we want to express, ask or tell "how long" or the "time duration" of an action, the Present
Perfect Continuous would be more natural:
BUT REMEBER:
Some verbs express "state" not "action"; therefore, we use the Present Perfect Simple not the
Continuous which "State Verbs" that we have discussed earlier in our course:
To conclude:
3. Exceptions to the rule: some verbs can be used in a dual sense i.e. a stative or a dynamic sense:
"be": although "be" is generally stative it can have a temporary dynamic sense: My boss is being nasty.
The verb <live> can be used in a stative sense when it means to "stay" or "be alive" i.e. a state: He didn't
live to see the realization of his dream. All other meanings are dynamic.
I hope she...
I am hoping she.... (dynamic: hope very much).
Final Note:
The verbs "live", "work" and "smoke" are usually said to be treated as stative verbs not actions.
♦️(2) In negative sentences, it's more natural to use the Present Perfect Simple not the Present Perfect
Continuous. If you remember, the Present Perfect Simple expresses an action that has started and
finished or never happened before. The Continuous expresses an action that has started before now and
has been continuing up until now.
So, there is no need to focus on the duration of a verb that is has not happened at all:
We use "For" when we measure the duration – when we say how long something lasts.
To measure a period of time up to the present, we use the present perfect tense and not the
♦️
present tense.
♦️Notice: The present tense with "For" refers to a period of time that extends into the future.
- How long are you here for? (Until when in the future)
- How long have you been here for? (Since when in the past)
♦️Notice: In reality, we can use all verb tenses with "For":
- He has been living in Turin for three months. (Present Perfect Continuous)
♦️"Since" gives the starting point of actions, events or states. It refers to when things began.
After "since" you always see a Simple Past time marker (not a length of a period of time).
- She has been watching TV for three hours. ("three hours" is not a simple past time marker.
It is a period of time. So, we must use "for" not "since".)
- She has been watching TV since 03:00 p.m. ("03:00 p.m." is a simple past time marker. So,
we must use "since" not "for".)
With since we use the present perfect tenses or the past perfect tenses.
♦️Since can also be used in the structure It has been + period of time + since.
- It has been two months since I last saw her. (Remember: "I last saw her" is simple past, so
we use "since")
♦️♦️♦️SUMMERIZATION♦️♦️♦️
♦️ "FOR" to mention a specific period (or duration) of time.
♦️ Both "For" and "Since" are most commonly used with the perfect tense - we don't use these
expressions in the present tense.
♦️While we can use "For" in the Simple Past tense, we can't use "Since" in the Simple
♦️ It worth mentioning that both "For" and "Since" have other meanings in English that are
not associated with time.
Further Notes on the differences between Present Perfect and Past Simple
Remember:
1- We use the past simple for past events or actions which have no connection to the present.
❌ (Tom doesn't have his book now.) He lost it.
2- We use the present perfect for actions which started in the past and are still happening
now OR for finished actions which have a connection to the present.
3- We CAN'T use the present perfect with a finished time word (specific time):
4- The Present Perfect is connected in someway to the present while the Past Simple is not at
all::
5- We cannot use a specific time with the present perfect tense, but we can tell how many
times.
6- We can also tell the number of times with past tense sentences. We usually do this when
we are telling the number of times and a specific time.
7- Sometimes, the present perfect can be used for things that finished very recently. In these
situations, we can use either the past tense or the present perfect tense.
Both "just or recently" can be used in the Present Perfect and Past Simple while the adverb
"lately" can be used in the Present Perfect ONLY.
- The company has just announced their sales results. (Present Perfect)
8- If there is no specific time, then we can use both. They have the same basic meaning.
- I went there.
The correct answer is: (Both "saw" and "have seen" are correct.)
Both "just" and "recently" can be used in the Present Perfect and Past Simple while the
adverb "lately" can be used in the Present Perfect ONLY.
This sentence would suggest that Tom is not still in the supermarket now. (The simple past
has no connection with now).
This sentence would suggest that Tom is almost in the supermarket now. (The present perfect
has connection with now).
So, both "saw" and "have seen" are correct with the adverb "just" with a little difference in
meaning.
Further Notes on the differences between Present Perfect and Past Simple
♦️ Use the simple past when the action started in the past, finished in the past, and is not
continuing now.
♦️ Use the present perfect when the action started in the past and is continuing now (or even
if it has finished, usually finishes in the recent past and has a result on now).
The simple past tells us that an action happened at a certain time in the past, and is not
continuing anymore. It tells us when an action happened, so more information needs to be
given with this verb form, such as when the action took place.
The present perfect tells us that an action started in the past and it is still happening now, or
it is something that happens regularly. We may need more information to tell us how long it
has been going on. It may also tell us that the time period it started in is still going on.
The following example sentences show the different meanings when using the two verb
tenses.
(Simple Past: We know that the sun came up at a time in the past and it is not rising now. The
sun may or may not be in the sky when this statement is made. The time is important to add.)
(Present perfect: We know that the sun already rose, and it is still in the sky now.)
(Simple Past: Eating lunch has started and ended in the past. Someone might say this when
the time for eating lunch has also ended. Lunch happened early, and it is over now.)
(Present Perfect: Jackson started and finished eating lunch in the past, but lunch time is still
going on. Someone might say this when others are preparing to eat lunch, and they want to
know whether Jackson will join them.)
(Simple Past: This tells us that Jeff is not friends with Kelly anymore, and the additional
information tells us when he was friends with her in the past.)
(Present perfect: This tells us that Jeff was friends with Kelly before now and is still friends
with her now. The friendship is continuing, and the additional information tells us how long it
has been going on.)
(Simple Past: This action started and finished in the past. She no longer lives in Paris. It is
important to know the action lasted for a year.)
(Simple Past: We know Meg ran two marathons in the past, and the time period the action
started in and finished in—last year—has ended.)
(Present perfect: We know Meg started running marathons this year. However, this year has
not ended and she may run more marathons before the end of the year.)
(We are now in the afternoon or evening. The morning period is finished.)
(Mozart is dead but this sentence would suggest that he is still alive. That's why it is an
incorrect sentence.)
♦️1- An action that happened (or never happened) before another action in the past:
b- My father retired last year. He had worked for the same company all his life.
(( We usually use the past perfect to make it clear which action happened first. Maybe we are
already talking about something in the past and we want to mention something else that is
further back in time. This is often used to explain or give a reasons for something in the past.))
b- She had got married by the time she was 22 years old.
(( Something that started in the past and continued up to another action or time in the past.
The past perfect tells us 'how long', just like the present perfect, but this time the action
continues up to a point in the past rather than the present. Usually we use 'for + time'. We can
also use the past perfect continuous here, so we most often use the past perfect simple with
stative verbs.))
(= He arrived in London six years before he graduated and lived there until he graduated, or
even longer.)
a- She would have passed the exam if she had studied harder.
a- She had cooked before she went out with her friends.
♦️1- Remember:♦️
There is no need to use the Past Perfect with "before" or "after". We can use the Simple Past in
both clauses because the relationship between the two actions is already clear with "before"
and "after".
a- She had not finished cleaning the house before the guests arrived.
or
b- She did not finish cleaning the house before the quests arrived.
♦️2- Remember:♦️
With the adverb of time "when", if the Simple Past tense is used in both clauses, then the the
verb in the "when-clause" is the verb that happens first:
But, when we use the Past Perfect in one of the two clauses, then the Past Perfect verb is the
verb that happens first.
♦️3- Remember:♦️
Don't use the Past Perfect Tense if you don't have a Simple Past Action / Time that you need to
go further back in time before it.
We use the past perfect continuous to show that something started in the past and continued
up until another time in the past. "For five minutes" and "for two weeks" are both durations
which can be used with the past perfect continuous. Notice that this is related to the Present
Perfect Continuous; however, the duration does not continue until now, it stops before
something else in the past.
a. They had been talking for over an hour before Tony arrived.
b. Mike wanted to sit down because he had been standing all day at work.
Using the past perfect continuous before another action in the past is a good way to show
cause and effect.
a. The pavement was wet. It had been raining.
(We use the Past Perfect Continuous Tense for repeated actions to say for how long the action
had been occurring before another past action i.e. with mentioning the duration of repetition):
a. I had been getting this magazine every week for a year before I unsubscribed.
b. She had been going to school every morning for two months before she travelled abroad.
♦️ 2- ONLY Have is correct when talking about actions, experiments or things that we do (In
these cases, 'have got' is NOT allowed:
If you are writing an informal message to your friends - on Facebook, for example - "have
got" is fine.
With "have got" we don’t use helping verbs such as do and don’t to form questions and
negatives:
While with "have" we do use the helping verbs "do or does" to form questions and negatives:
♦️ 5- "Have got" only exists in the Present Simple Tense. We don’t use it in the continuous,
past or future tenses.
* He has a problem. ✅
* He had a problem. ✅
"Have got" is NOT normally used in the simple past tense "had got"; it is not considered
correct to say:
Rather, "had" alone is used as the simple past. "Had got" is normally heard as an even more
colloquial version of "have got".
♦️NOTE-2:
The "have" in "have got" is almost always contracted (e.g. I've got, he's got, John's got).
In the sense of to be obliged, the "have" is sometimes not contracted when "got" or the
subject is stressed in the sentence:
(The two examples above are both common but "I've got to go there." is almost exclusively
preferred in spoken English over "I have got to go there.").
♦️NOTE-3:
While "have got" and variants are common colloquial usage, in most cases the "got" is
redundant and can be removed without changing the meaning of the sentence.
When "have got" or "has got" is used as the Present Perfect of get, then got should be
retained.
((In American English, one normally says "have gotten" or "has gotten" when forming the
present perfect of "get", but nevertheless one uses "have got" or "has got" when the
meaning is "to have".
♦️ We use "used to" when we refer to things in the past which are no longer true. It can refer
to repeated actions or to a state or situation:
For example:
- He used to play football for the local team, but he’s too old now.
The negative of "used to" is most commonly "didn’t use(d) to". Sometimes we write it with a
final -d, sometimes not. Both forms are common, but many people consider the form with
the final -d to be incorrect, and you should not use it in formal writing:
- I didn’t used to like broccoli when I was younger, but I love it now. (Don’t use this form in
exams, because it is informal.)
In very formal styles, we can use the negative form "used not to":
♦️Questions:
The most common form of question is the auxiliary "did" + use(d) to. Many people consider
the form with a final -d to be incorrect, and you should not use it in formal writing:
- I think we met once, a couple of years ago. Did you use to work with Kevin Harris?
- Didn’t she used to live in the same street as us? (Don’t use this form in written Academic
exams.)
♦️ Emphatic "did"
"used to" (when used as a verb) refers to actions and situations in the past which no longer
happen or are no longer true. It always refers to the past:
- She used to sing in a choir, but she gave it up. (She sang, but she doesn’t sing any more)
"be used to" (when used as an adjective) means ‘be accustomed to’ or ‘be familiar with’. It
can refer to the past, present or future. We follow "be used to" with a noun (phrase), a
pronoun or the -ing form of a verb "the gerund":
- I work in a hospital, so I’m used to long hours. (I am accustomed to/familiar with long
hours.)
- She lives in a very small village and hates traffic. She’s not used to it.
- I'm used to getting up early, so I don't mind doing it (= getting up early is normal for me, it's
what I usually do).
♦️Note that we make the negative or the question with the verb 'be' in the normal way. The
'used to' doesn't change:
♦️ We can use 'get used to + verb-ing' (which is considered more formal than "be used to") to
talk about the change of not normal to normal. We can also use this in any tense:
- Don't worry if your new job is hard at first. You will get used to it.
- It took me a few months to get used to living in Japan. At first everything seemed very
different, but then gradually it became normal for me.
We can use the Present Continuous ( I am doing) and the Present Simple (I do) to talk about
future events:
♦️ Arrangements / Plans:
(something that you have already decided to do and you have made some preparations for
it). Usually, more than one person is aware of the event and some preparations have already
happened.
(We also use the present continuous for an action just before we start to do it. This happen
especially with verbs of movement (go/come/leave etc.):
(Something that always occurs at the same time - usually for airports, schools, companies
etc.)
moment.
Examples:
Examples:
- Tomorrow, the sun will rise at 8:30 and will set at 5 PM.
♦️Predictions based on opinion (will) or based on a present situation (be going to)
(1) to express opinions about things that may happen in the future; or
(2) to make assumptions about the future based on something that's happening now (or a
present situation).
Examples:
- The clouds are coming out... It's going to rain. (an assumption based on the clouds)
We use "be going to + infinitive" to describe an arrangement that we plan to do in the future.
This can be tricky for learners. We do not use "will" for things that we've already arranged or
decided to do. As noted above, we use "will" for things that we decide to do right at that very
moment of speaking.
(Please note that we can either use "be going to" or the present continuous to express a
future plan). The present continuous and "be going to + infinitive" are formed in a similar
way).
As noted above, we use "be going to" to express future actions that are planned in advance
and "will" for spontaneous decisions. However, if the main verb is "be," we can use "will" to
express a future action - even if it is for a firm plan or decision made in advance.
Examples:
We can use "will" to show that we are willing or voluntarily agreeing (or not willing or
agreeing) to do something in the future.
This includes making promises that we will do something and making requests or asking
people if they are willing to do something.
Examples:
We can use "will" in the future simple tense to invite people to future events.
- Yes! Will you come with me to tell my parents the good news?
"Shall" is used with the "I" and "we" forms to make offers and suggestions using questions.
(Note: We don't use "shall" for "you / he / she / it / they" when we make offers and
suggestions).
Examples:
Shall is often used with "I" and "we" to ask about someone's opinion or advice (usually about
an offer or suggestion.)
We can also talk about the future without using a future verb tense.
For example, as noted above (for planned events), we can use the present continuous to talk
about something that we have a plan or intention to do in the future.
Also, the simple present is used for scheduled (timetabled) events in the future.
♦️ 2- to make a prediction:
Notice: Some predictions are about facts – things that we know always happen:
- Jean’s over there. I’ll just go and say ‘hello’ before we leave.
Remember: We use will and be going to for decisions, intentions and plans. We use will when
the decision is immediate and be going to when we have already made a plan.
- Will you be quiet please? I’m trying to make an important phone call.
"Will" may be used to refer to inanimate objects and how they respond to humans, most
typically in the negative form won’t:
In the past, ‘shall’ was often used as an alternative to ‘will’, but in modern English we usually
prefer ‘will’ for affirmative and negative sentences. However, we still use ‘shall’ to form
questions with ‘I’ and ‘we’, especially in British English.
♦️ 1- to make offers using "I" and "we" (When you want to know if someone wants you to do
something for them):
Notice: "Shall" is sometimes used with second and third person pronouns to express a threat.
♦️ 4- to make a promise:
♦️We do not use 'will' to say what somebody has already arranged or decided to do:
♦️We use 'will' to say what we know or believe about the future (not what someone has
already decided).
Compare:
1- I think James is going to the party on Friday. (= I think he has already decided to go)
2- I think James will go to the party on Friday. (= I think he will decide to go)
♦️We often use will (’ll) with: probably, I’m sure, I think, I don’t think or I wonder
- Don't worry about the exam. I'm sure you will pass.
♦️Normally we use 'shall' only with I and we. You can say:
Notice-1:
Notice-3:
Notice-4:
Shall or will?
What is the difference between these four uses of the future tense?
and
Please feel free to leave us a comment telling us about the difference between these two
pairs of sentences.
Many people think that "shall" and "will" are interchangeable, but strictly speaking they are
not. Moreover, the ways in which they differ are highly complicated.
- "I/We will" though still expresses the future, additionally conveys intention or
determination.
- "You/He/She/It/They shall" are almost directives. They still express the future, but there is
an additional sense of determination or even command conveyed.
Thus, it's 3 above is the unadorned statement; 4 is an effect issuing an order, or at least
expressing the speaker's belief that the words will come true.
A very confusing concept is when to use WILL and when to use BE GOING TO when we talk
about the future.
Both refer to the future, and there is a slight difference between the two; though in most
cases they can be used interchangeably with no difference in meaning.
Even if you misuse them, a native speaker is going to understand you without any problems.
BE GOING TO ♦️♦️
♦️♦️
The structure BE GOING TO is normally used to indicate the future BUT with some type of
connection to the present. We use it in the following situations:
♦️ 1. When we have already decided or we INTEND to do something in the future. (Prior Plan):
- They're going to retire to the beach. (They have already bought a little beach house.)
- I'm going to accept the job offer. (I have thought enough about the job offer.)
♦️ 2. When there are definite signs that something is going to happen. (Evidence)
Something is likely to happen based on the evidence or experience you have now.
- I don't feel well. I think I'm going to throw up. (throw up = vomit)
- I think I'll try one of those. (I just decided this right now.)
("I'm going to get it." is very strange, because it makes us think that Julie knew the phone
was going to ring before it really did).
2- Our meeting starts in 5 minutes and we still need 15 minutes to get there:
We are going to be late for the meeting. (It's clear enough that we are going to be late at least
10 minutes.)
Jane will be late for the meeting. (She is always late, so I think / believe that she will be late
as usual, but this is only a prediction.)
Unit-24 will be doing and will have done
Further reading on the differences between will be doing and will have done
♦️ 1- Future continuous is used to say that an action will be in progress at a specific time in the
future:
♦️ 2- Future continuous is used for an action in progress in the future which is interrupted by a
shorter action:
♦️ 5- Future continuous is used to make polite enquiries about someone’s plans (without
wishing to influence those plans):
- Will you be watching TV this evening? (You simply want to know if the TV will be free!)
- Will you be taking the car tomorrow? (I just want to know if the car will be free so I can take
it in case you don't want to take it.)
♦️ 6- We also use the future continuous to talk about complete actions (rather than ongoing
actions) in the future (When we use it in this way, will be (doing) is similar to will (do) and
going to (do):
- The team’s star player is injured and won’t be playing in the game on Saturday.
♦️ 1- When describing an action that will be completed before another action or point in the
future (The action will be completed between now and some point of time in the future.):
- By the end of this lecture, you will have understood the Future Perfect Tense.
♦️ 2- We use the future perfect to say ‘how long’ for an action that starts before and
continues up to another action or time in the future. Usually we need ‘for’ to indicate time
duration of that action:
♦️ 3- We use the future perfect with a future time word, (often with 'by') to talk about an
action that will finish before a certain time in the future, but we don't know exactly when:
- By the time I'm sixty-four, I will have retired. (= I will retire sometime before I'm sixty.
♦️ 4- Use 3: Certainty about the Near Past (to express conviction / confidence / belief / or
assumption that something happened in the near past):
- The train will have left by now. We have to look for another way to get there. (I'm sure the
train has left.)
Further reading on Future Time Clauses (when I do and when I have done) if and when
♦️ Future time clauses are dependent clauses that must be joined to independent (main)
clauses. It is customary to use the Future Tense in the independent clause and the Simple
Present tense in the dependent (time) clause.
- When the movie will end, I will go to bed. ❌ ((Don't use the Future Tense in the dependent
(time) clause))
♦️ Time clauses often start with: "when, while, before, after, as soon as, and until".
- As soon as I finish the dishes, I'll help you with your homework.
♦️ In conditional clauses with words like if, unless, even if, we often use present tense forms to
talk about the future:
- I will come home when I finish work. (NOT will finish work)
- You must wait here until your father comes. (NOT will come)
♦️ Time clauses with reference to the future can also be introduced by other expressions such
as: (once, the moment, the minute, the day, by the time...)
♦️ When we want to concentrate on the completion of the first verb before the second verb
starts happening, we use the Present Perfect instead of the Simple Present in the
Independent (main) Clauses. Compare:
- When you finish your homework, you can watch TV. (S/he may be allowed to watch TV
without even really finishing their homework).
- When you have finished your homework, you can watch TV. (S/he will NOT be allowed to
watch TV unless they really finish their homework).
- When it stops raining, we will go out. (We may even go out before the rain actually stops).
- When it has stopped raining, we will go out. (We will NOT go out until the rain has totally
stopped).
♦️Can: uses♦️
2- Ability: (We often use "can" to talk about ability to do something in the present or future.):
📌 Notice: We often use can with verbs of perception such as "hear, see, smell, taste", and
mental process verbs such as "guess, imagine, picture, understand and follow (in the sense of
‘understand’)":
3- General truths: (We use "can" to talk about things which we think are usually, but not
always, true.):
- Reducing cholesterol through diet can be difficult. (It’s not always difficult for everyone, but
in general, it is difficult.)
📌 Notice: (We don’t normally use "could" to talk about what we believe to be true in the
present). Compare:
- Exercise can help reduce stress. (I believe this is a general truth or fact.)
- Finding a hotel in August can be difficult. (I believe this is a general truth or fact based on my
experience or knowledge.)
♦️Could: uses♦️
1- Possibility: (We often use "could" to express possibility in the present and the future.)
Compare:
- The storm will get worse. (I’m certain that the storm will get worse.)
- The storm could get worse. (I’m not certain that the storm will get worse.)
2- Permission: (Like "can", we use "could" to ask for permission. "Could" is more formal and
polite than "can".):
3- General Past Ability: (We usually use "could" or "couldn't" to talk about general abilities in
the past.) General ability means that a person had the ability to do something at all times and
in all situations. These are skills or talents a person once had rather than specific occasions. In
the past tense, English speakers almost always use “could.”
📌 Notice: We don’t usually use "could" to talk about single events that happened in the past
(past achievements). When actual past achievements are mentioned, we usually use
"was/were able to" or "managed to" but not "could" in affirmative clauses. This is because
they are facts, rather than possibilities:
- We hired a car and we were able to/managed to drive 1,000 miles in one week.
Not: We hired a car and we could drive 1,000 miles in one week.
4- Past Possibility: (We use "could have + -ed" form to talk about possibility in the past:
- They could have taken a taxi home instead of walking and getting wet.
📌 Notice: We use "could" with some verbs to refer to single events that happened in the past;
with verbs of the senses (smell, taste, see, hear, touch, etc.) and mental processes (think,
believe, remember, understand etc.):
1- Specific Ability on one occasion – successful: (Specific ability means that the person had the
ability to do something in a specific situation or at a specific time.) When we talk about
achieving something on a specific occasion in the past, we use "was/were able to" (= had the
ability to) and "managed to" (= succeeded in doing something difficult).
- The burglar managed to get in through the bathroom window even though it was locked.
📌 Notice: Could is not usually correct when we're talking about ability at a specific moment in
the past. The typical mistakes learners make are to use "could" for past positive specific
ability.
- My friend’s phone was engaged all day yesterday. Finally, late in the evening, I could speak
to him.
In this sentence, we should use "I was able to speak to" or "I managed to speak to" him.
- We ran fast and could catch the bus. (Wrong. "could" cannot be used to mean succeeded).
📌 Notice: “Was/were able to” and “managed to” both suggest effort. They mean someone
succeeded in doing something that was a challenge or took a special effort. However, the
phrase “managed to” puts a little more emphasis on how hard the challenge was or how
much effort it took.
Example:
When Jim was a boy he could climb trees very well (This was a general ability). However,
there was one tree that was very tall and he couldn’t climb it (the general specific rule is only
for "could" in positive so there is no issue here). One day, when he was feeling very energetic,
he was a able to/ managed to climb the tree (specific time, situation).
2- Specific Ability on one occasion – unsuccessful: (When we talk about a specific occasion
when someone didn't have the ability to do something, we can use "wasn't/weren't able to,
didn't manage to" or "couldn't".):
In the first sentence, you are admitting your inability to find it, even though it may be there.
The second two suggest further searching might uncover it.
"I couldn't find you" -- gives the implication that you couldn't find the person because of
some reason that is unapparent, but your fault.
However, "I was not able to / did not manage to find you" -- gives the implication that there
was some reason out of your control that caused you to not find them. Like traffic or too
many people or that they were hiding.
📌 Note that "wasn't/weren't able to" is more formal than "couldn't", while "didn't manage
to" emphasises that the thing was difficult to do.
📌 Notice: Sometimes, for the negative form of "managed to", we say, “couldn’t manage to”
instead of “didn’t manage to.” They mean the same thing:
- He studied for months but couldn’t manage to pass the bar exam.
Unit-27 could (do) and could have (done)
Further reading on the uses of can, could (do) , and could have (done)
♦️ SOMETIMES "could" is the past form of "can", the present form (see Unit-26):
Examples:
- I could smell something burning. (In the PAST, there was something burning.)
♦️ BUT "could" is NOT ALWAYS past. We can use "could" to talk about PRESENT and/or
FUTURE possibility.
Examples:
- He has been in prison for two months, and could be released next week. (FUTURE
possibility)
NOTE: In these situations, we can also use "can" instead of "could". HOWEVER, "could" is
LESS SURE than "can".
Example:
- Who knows? she could win the competition. (Future - LESS SURE)
Example:
- I'm so tired. I could sleep for a week. (Not I can sleep for a week)
COMPARE:
- We can have some fish for dinner. (REALISTIC - MORE SURE)
Examples:
- Though the situation was bad, but it could have been worse. (PAST)
♦️Something could have happened = it was possible, but it did not happen:
Examples:
2- It would not have been possible in the PAST, I would not be able to:
- We use "must" when we are almost 100% sure that something is True.
- We use "can't" when we are almost 100% sure that something is Impossible.
For example, Alex works from 8:00 am to 2:00 pm every day, now it is 10:00 am. We can say:
- He must be at work. (We are almost 100 % sure that he is at work because he has been
there since 8:00 am.)
- He can't be at home. (We are almost 100 % sure that it is impossible for him to be at home
now because he has been at work since 8:00 am.)
- We use "must have" when we are almost 100% sure that something was True.
- We use "can't have" when we are almost 100% sure that something was Impossible.
For example, John, who works from 8:00 am to 2:00 pm, was at work yesterday. We were
walking by his house yesterday at 10:30 am. My friend said: "Let's visit John". I was sure that
it was impossible to find him at home because he works at this time. So, we can say:
- He must have been at work. (We are almost 100 % sure that he was at work at that time.)
- He can't have been at home. (We are almost 100 % sure that it was impossible for him to be
at home at that time.)