37214 33

(AGGRESSION AND SOCIAL VIOLENCE)

(Meaning and Nature of Aggression )

THGdns
(aggressive behaviour ) G G4I( universal phenomenon )§ 34HG 344

HEà3ATGAI4G
H(Buss, 1061 ) 731G614hdl (aggression ) 1 VG HLTH YfTqT A U

fu fzar Tr fgfeiT( driling ) Ta+a 3GET 3TEAIHF ZEIR (aggressive behaviour )E6RT

(intention )à T4 ÀTÊi TGI TI 3HGYY q àaGaÍfe'(Berkowitz 1975 )* 3qHR,

tH Td af (Baron &Byrne, 1987 ) Yai , '31ATHGEAI u# UHI AER

1. "Aggression is aresponse that delivers noxious stimulito another organism. 1961.p.3.

-Buss : The Psychology of Aggression, p215
(2. "Aggession is the intentional injury of another." P
-Berkwitz : ASurvey of Social [Link]
3. "Aggressionis a behaviour directedtowardsthe goal of harming orinjuring another living being is
who 331.
1988,|p.
to avoid such treatment." -Baron &Byrne : Social Psychology.
612
 efat4, vef-t4, fu ua frer`(Aikinson, Atkinson, Smith &Hilgard, 1987 )% 3ge,

tr, veTS; TG ÍT( Taylor, Peplau &Sears, 2006 )à 3reT, ' ft Ar4 fol 3THTT

2. 3TAIH5 AER 3f4 (intention ) T*2 (explicit ) ît a HAdT 4T 3Uhe ( implicit )

3ATGSTHGI (instrumental agression ) h GIà,

3. 3TG514Ghdll ifg(victim )I RET T+(target person )31GH|HG 4TER Aq â aIfNIT

TG HEdI , t 34 31Gh146 GER (aggressive behaviour ) 7 HEI SIR

egT f 31614; TR ( aggressive behaviour ) a ffNaT faNGIr aát àfst 3TR

AAHHGI taRY HHTGfeT ( antisocial ), 4HTH1ÍGG (prosocial ) TRT 54 rt ¥gh

(sanctioned ) fT HGdT IHHGfÍ 341G54G T 34TG465 GER EGTH

(prosical aggression )E ATGT }I SA, HTG-fyaI EI 3NTH¬THE ER, YE EHST F TH6

Aggression may be defined as "physical or verbal behaviour that is inteudcd to hurt someone."
-Myers: Social Psychology, 1988. p. 395.
2. "Aggression is the behaviour that is intended to injure another person (physically or verbally) or to destroy
property." -Atkinson, Atkinson, Smith &Hilgard : Introduction to Psychology, 1987, p. 369.
3. "Aggression is defined as any action that is interded to hurt others."
-Taylor, Peplau &Sears: Social Psychology, 2006, p. 407
 tendency 4AEr 614
If4AYUIHG HAUgrs 3a 37RfaT
4. 3. 2. 1. 3. 1. 43 3T
)Àinborn ( HTHY-TGAI uTe
theoryH4|4 eugtrG learning
E3T Z f
ffE0a 3114*
instinct ( 4à
of fHGA: f }STà TET
behaviourfHGTA
TA 314-| 3114
Aggression 31614dTtheory 3ift FTRRT I
HGT feGId ) yfifra R
Linstinct à
instinct ( GaI-3/TA|46l 3afa fa344ER
haT ) GER 3T614hdT *
hoanalytical HTSG fAA (Instinct (aggressive
Err ) fRGia t external (
3T65R5 à
theory theory ) aggression ( It
: ( 344 Tt,34
3TA4||Social ft fu
theory I 4RT (aggression
|(Theories transformation3Td
) YAHqfH )% 1444T yHgra behaviourGT(
3a Theory )
q4,(Instinct Learning )t biological ATGGT4ChT
fHta
) EH
I3T6 Ga-31A|HdI (
theory aggressive
instinct (4q94 ( G| HHA ) of t
y: Theory Drive GÀ* fHGi(factors HT4G ) Aggression t
) fG-4-f4} 30 )
T f4GIH Theory
) YI ) fs experience
frh
R
ft RU
instinct )#YT (origin
4ftcat HGIT aRUT )
: (human Afrs
3TGA| 4 Ghctt General (
Frustration-aggression theory
(Lorenz 3H HIHI|GG
frstration-aggression ( ) H( social (
3 t Y
fA0 aar )a1 nature 3Tyfr norms
Aggresive Ela
aT) aggression ( HÝ accepted
qHGYIT ) )
3TIK9IE HGNqT
(inst TI
SH Z at
Model social ( &,3afaTt moral
T4 HTE(angery
)th hypothesis) standardsy
: context) theory
Moderm fre )
 **1 (aggressive(generalization ) (
fs4Tethologist) -t arz (life constructive
functions #à
T EV (G) ET4E
(Thanatos )itnsti(nct )IufacTHI^HS
T3
instinct) E
T iA
RG
6 behaviour Freud ( HGHqT
aRaT¢ fr HGYq0TfrhT 4T
H14 (Lorenz, tg 4
)
S(
Z ) ytaR GHqIT( 343HR, (instinct)
) Sigmund
HfayeuHS
1967 faaHTHG t ufd T¿T
l fatdT H-qid death HG
) 3TAIHGT( Hciugfr Freud
T T (Ethological
theory instinct)# YALgÍT( (psychoanalysis
I )
HR 4 destructive ( RS instinct
death () ( RT
HGTT: aggression instinct fHgid
SITdl Ri fhT
qHa death
T3T gt ) (Freud'Ts
& ) ( instinct HGHgfr 6T ) TI
(Why TE Konrad )-5H )
*3AGAI4S * 3à
) TGT 34ÌföHT T ) g
human â (life
4fayèqurr HIA
psychoanlytical
LorenzfHGIT T(
T a1A destructive
( 3fyf CHT instinct tI
4GER violence G
beings Ii qE3d
H ) T
34I yfrYIGT
fT death ( )T4S
kil aggressive (
fGHIT ) goal fIT TT f4iTtheory
E
each H7 T4TI fTYT instinct y
TT )
#t 30GHG( 34HIK,
T YNE 3HfTU)-34
other) R YIY 3GHá(
t behaviour ) f Ud(deatn
fr)
31ARIE
3T H^A3TR inward fuGa
Ga
R GAÀI block
4ER HeH 615
gR, Id
K ) ) T
 616 ifart t FTÙUI

aggressign ) ât f
1. 6 4q GHt Hq
TfT
it ñSeT (Why one human kills
another
( human
human
(mechanism5(fighu

(innate inhibition ) át ygfr fGT aT

GIfat HCRT ufr 341Gh14hdl (aggression

3/1G514hGI(
(technological development ) U4got faHrHF ZIÍT ( destructive power ) Àafa

2. HYTHT YIf& aT HUUT (Building up of instinctual energy )- aT TGHRITE

3415|45 VfT(instinctual aggressive energy )* 4EY &0 AI HT HEqut H TI A43( Freud

HAVAIH 3AEA4& YÍGA ( instinctual aggressive energy )fhci-t 4aT JHT GIt, ardiety

SITGTs ( Criticisms ) Taf HGIHgr fHc0T (instinct theory ) 3G6TH* 44ER

1.54 HS0a aT 4Z YTfh YTUT (organism )

3IGATHG ER (aggressive behaviour )ink
2. rqfres fraÍT
death instinct)

S4 LGA MTGhYT (hypothesis )

 617

faà
Brown, 1963 )TRT
&

rf iqafast (Berkowitz, 1973)à 3và

T AatI qaifast (Berkowitz ) 4E vftUTH f ugfr frzia (instinct theory )* fa H

T E HIH:
, 48 HHT GIAT aorî ga T ATHIfAGE GV4 (natural enemy )a t8I
T F3t (Zing Yang Kuo, 1930 ) 344T 3 Td HfaT fzar TTI 34 faît

5.4i-rg (Montague, 1976 ) yGygfrs faia (instinct theory ) 3 rà à sa fT

qH7 (The nature of human aggression) 4 G4Gld 36|4GT HuT ( concept ) T GST h

TGfa ,5gâ sa (Ituri Forest )> fft ( Pigmy ) anfr , fH4SBT ZTAst ( Tasady ) IfT A
 621

(anger ) HT

qifde ( Geen &

Berkowitz, 1967 )
appropriate cues ) aTratUf34 3
TfUTH 48
aggression theory )
modified frustration

( Social
T ufrIGT UGT (Bandura,ILearning Theory )
1973 ) AT feT T4TI
( develpment )& ugT 3HEî
Salcet( Walters, 1975

1. 31Gh|H6 AR 0 3HÍT
behaviour ? ) yT?(What are the sources of origin of aggressive
2. 31Gh|H R# 3Ts 4TÁ?(What are
3. 341h|HG dR h
instigators of aggressive behaviour ?)
G I I ?(How is aggressive
behaviour learnt ?)

A.3A1GhTHchl T 3I1Gh14h RHT 3M id TÈ ?( What are the sources of origin

ofaggression or aggressive behaviour ? -H fHGIT 34HT EA YI HYE 4 ATGTHGAT( aggression )
34 EH éH HIG (Sources ) 4d
(i) vrA frT Direct instruction) atfefri t fe afATATHA REEK

(ii )uA Gafe GH( Trial and errorlarning )3HHdI Wd 4G G afz trGI
(trial anderror learning )Áit , HH fI Gr A1S v# qT q ÇHT GT 3ATGHUT I}IVRft

aggressive behaviour ) TFIfE 8à wñm vd gz (rial and error ) * R m ATEAHGal

(aggressiveness ) aE H5ya qI
(üiü) }eunas îGI( Observation learning TATHGI(aggression )1 HT aa }AUTHS
S (observational learning )ài ugT (Bandura, 1975 ) A^H TT R 3fE G SII 3it HaI
622

qHt HIHIGG Het (social context ) 343 HSG(model ) 3fc

(Bandura, 1973 ) TAlU ug ugT (Watlers &Bandura, 1963 ) 34HI H RE EI ÍgH
TTT HT: yad (reinforcement ) U 344cUT EGT I

2. 3TGAT4G ET Jtvca IÈ?(What are the instigators of aggressive behaviour 2)

EATf Tifad ( a 33.1 d)

(Reinforcers )
(Origin) (Instigator)
1. 41
1. frVT 1. fasfa fa
341F4hI 2. 3414 (self )
2. TerUT ’[Link]
3. 2T41
3. U (4SfiT)
(Vicarious )
(Trial& Error ) 4. tET (Incentive)
1

31-tZRT f T 3TZ44 C
treatment)-4HG
(i) fasfa f a a (aversive experiences ) af& T }4T HGfTE EY
ELGR TT afst grat ( frustrating
T4Tf5 GECIÍ,
Gtart3IGTHATHTHfE y 3qHfcd (social approved ) t ar I

Milgram, 1964, 1965 )* 34A 4E fGAIAT f TTGrí fr

GHS HH TTI fMGTATH (
3T14
rt 3GTHGd( aggressionfcGAAI T H f f 4
(authority )41

TeUT( Observation)uET( Bandura, 1973 )* 3g4r 31THGhG (aggression ) T JA417

(iii)

) 3r
) arî UST GTH (Bandura &Ross, 1974

(iv ) tHIET I YRAr fH 3T9IT(Anticipation of incentive or reward

 623

GnaTH AAEIT ht aT T? (How is aggressive behaviour learnt ?) 3TA

reinforcement ),
(Bandura, 1963 )8T 47f 3TG61H5 AGEL f ayáTt ( external
( vicarious reinforcement
yrdeT( self-reinformcement ) GT AIY y4d4
external reinforcement ) STH YAR, HTHIfG 3HHcT (social approval ),
R(sOcial status ),HLHl 34Tyfrt yfT ( removal of painful experiences ),
(Victim
4T f SI a 34165|4F
AYGTGT1T UG ER(Geen &Stoner, 1973 ) 3744 3T4
34H 34T 48 4AAI4T
Z Sé-Ti G|- U¢ aIreH (Cowan & Walters, 1973 ) t
4SGTI3H 3744 3444
f 31G14hd 9 y44H 374T (shedule of reinforcement ) Iâ THTG y-d(partial
# urq f qa ht 31|Hhll 4 Hdd yidH(Continuous reinforcement )7T 3fNTÁT

EI Gt y 316|4G
TT T, 3THTHGI it adi HAT YdH (Continuous reinforcement )

3rE, giHT T refd ( AIbercht, Thomas &Chadwick, 1980 )* 3qH 34TC4-Y4T I 5

q af
I-4 ydt (vicarious reinforcement ) a t 3416514 aR fG
3TGTHHG 3 YUTH H 4td3I fEtEt ( psychological sharing)ÀJT I ,

TAYT y4GT (vicarious reinforcement ) afT 341G14dT 3qfH4T aa EII

Edt t fad fs aa yTcTT (external reinforcement )T 3TT-yde (self-reinforcement ) arr

34g4 faGU A Ef HIHfGEGHI fHGT (social iearning theory )3H 5 I
hl f f 3HH GER( aggressive behaviour) (how )HTGI?3Hh 3G1G 4E fHaIa
 624

fs 3H E0T d-3/T54ll f4Gd (frustration-aggression

(supplement )HT T theory )H

fafiI (individual difference) HRU 3A5 TA at T4gHTH (past experiences ) a

GeneralAggresionModei or GAM)
3J1E54Ga HHE fHl Tt t 3TYG HG7 UUSTHT (Anderson, 1997 )7T USTHT
Aggression Model or
G qYI4 (Anderson & Bushman, 2002 ) HTA 3AG4il HST (General
NT (input variables ) arT 3 I
ATGA4GHT Y1d:fH0fd TRE
(i) vkffT Há AUG (Factors relating to the situation ), TT
(ii) fA HI4ã HLG (Factors relating to the persons )

( personal factors ) hEI GIGT 3R31 Z HGI 3-8 HGyT R(input variables )#T GTGTd
aggressive model ) aRIGG
(frustration ), fT f aRT 39HI4G H4T GIHT, 31H|4T HISGT (

HIHT 3EGI46d HIST (General Aggression model ) 31HR YRf T Gh

 625

Input Variables
(i) raiHG AT( Affective states )-31
fa fatvyuf yra (hostile
feelings ) 34-7
a1 3TT (angry facial expression ) Tar
(Situational
a af TE5 3tT(physiological excitement ) Factors Factors

(iii ) 4H(Cognition )3i H 3 IG

ufaT fasyut 4 (hostile thoughts )
Current Internal State
HGI Affect
tgfr (attitude )3 4
Cognition Arousal

Appraisal and
decision processes
Thoughtu action
Impuisive action
(e.g. aggrossion)

HT 3HTàít TEr (impulsive behaviour ) fa 33.2 ;T:Z TAH5a TSG :HTA TGHET

I 34T 43 GI A fu
qT TYT USTHT (Bushman & Anderson, 2002 ) 3H fHGT

)3rfs4g a TGT 3ref 3c5T4GhdT Haf faR, fAYAIH, HAgfa, ÁHT( schema)
structure

Violence )
(Factors Provoking Aggression and

(Cultural causes ). (3 ) ufta hT(UT

T) HTATtshTUT (Socialcauses ). (2 ) HÍhÍd aUT
causes )I5H IGRGt qUT 3H 34-1d
(rersonal causes ) T(4)vffafas HI(UT ( Situational
 626

(1) HIf H1UT (Social Causes )

(i) 3tA SI &(Level ofArousal)

fsfTHT (Zillman, 1988,
fuSIT 1994)
JtR-saTUT fRGH ( excitation-transfer theory ) át HIT fET I 34
EILHI- (Christy, Gelfand & Hartmann, 1971 )*
S¡I CaI àIftt, rUS TI
TG4ATT ( Rogers & Ketcher, 1979 )
ufai GT 3A¬ 3AH (arousal ), Í d eR
(Zillmann, 1979 ) # 344H
GRE T 3 3tT TT NTHH

1994 ) 3GHR 5H TE E
31G549dI 34 a IT }I cH|7 (Zillmann,
34q4R 3tH 30GU HT 4E f TGT
(aware ) TÍ SGL I}r (Taylor, 1991, 1994 )

Bg-BIG ( Direct Provocation )7áGH YTT 48 YaT T f 4 fT m

(iü) yH 3ATHGI ÍKT & GT 34 a
fT 4T f5 YIfaE I5-3^ ( verbal provocation ) yT f gq fÍ 3 a7
3TEq d GH4R ( Ohbuchi&Kambara, 1985 ) 34t 3744 comments ) Tf8 Y ZHG fR
faî f a â31e GI¥à, aqguf fewfurT (sarcastic

uG fT GH H 36
(i) aff (Harris, 1999 ) 344T TTE YaT TT f

(ii) (Baron, 1993 ) 34qHR }HT GT V 3 31a f s fH RÍHT NER E

)
(iüi ) oT (Frustration)Ga-3/|64GdI Y4hCTT (frustration aggression hypothesis)

SIIS ¢ 3H HETT (Dollard et. al., 1939 ) ufayfca

HRU YE YIAHCYT
 627

( )FarFT(always ) fef--f arams 3 ET,

(ü) 314T
sfrrifr
(exaggerasion)
frustrated ) ett , t suà zT fa
aTETT 3
depression ) 3/f2
( hat td g 3Hhdl U¢ 4iftt 3fGhT
(automatic response

(Folger &Baron, 1996 ) fT, TE TT

(iv) fod (Purpose of frustrating behaviour a 3AH

fraTT ((frustration-aggression theory )
(frustration)

af aR qE
(Expectation of retaliation ) -
 628

3f 34TTH5 BAER fZGAT } (Taylor, 1992 ) 343 37ATH

3rq 3TA
(vi) ufrfrat ( Competition)-eT(Deutsch, 1993 )

3744 f4T fGrn 8 HEHTT4T (participants ) 3E TT

& Morrow, 1995 )

(2) Hiafah h1UT (Cultural Causes )

(expectation )
T& 4,FS HEÍT 4 UHT fAYAH (beliefs ), H45 (norms )TTuRI

f 8 f HT(Cultures of honor ) HIà

u 3fAd GEK H-HT SIGI } 3 HHG 4143I1
He fh4Tàf5 pSHHR nfs Àa
T AHAg ( Cohen &Nishbett, 1997, 2000 ) 4E

TGHHGGT AT fAT fGA HGÍT fT ESI 4sT G EET (Vandello &Cohen, 2003 )3RT

Cohen. 2003 ) 3T 3
3TG6T46Yuf R TIT }A Ià43 G HET ( Vandello &
 629

(3) tufaHG AT(UT ( Personal Causes )

yíîgUu (traits )t4dqrT (temperament ) 341f HafA a T 3155145 a r a 3 HãaI

() agTs AAEIr ket( Type Abehaviour pattern)4143 ZIST T GEK TAI ZIST AT

ER,34 ZrsT d GER 0ei (Type Bbehaviour pattern ) %a1 I ft S 07,

FHT TAT 34| (Baron, Russell& Arms, 1985 ), GT TT TÇAIH (Carver &Glass, 1978 ) aT fE4

IEÁ aIG f& HIHE 3/16146GI ( instrumental aggression )q I ã FTT FH fEGTI

Hn fazi TuIrRqUT Yafuz (Hostile attribution bias )-31 ¢ 3AT HEITt (Dodge etal.,

IE (Dodge &Coie, 1987 ) ZRT t Ts 3754T 34 qy át qZ 6y Hyfe s

(sensationseeking ) gT fET }I J (Zuckerman, 1994 )> 3gIr TE HTTYTYird (impulsivity )

630

Aggression Model )? (General

qT T(Joireman, Anderson &Strathman, 2003

(i) af

VIf<E (verbal ) 34IGAT4I 3fs at aI THG TSA

fafaT ( Sex Diferences)341G14hdI f& * fT (sex ) 6T
Cir)
(Harris, 1994 ) TAIS (Bogard, 1990 )4T , 3Y 3447 # f41 ar
fH4 ztH
T H (Walker, Richardson & Green, 2000 ) 3 3444 * 3AATR Y8 Td
Rars

(size )fHfdf f 36T f

3TR fAIÀI
1996 ) 34t 3744T

341G74G+ yAR T HÍCT ETI GUGfe,3 H gI Seq5( Bjorkquist,

( direction ) 34 q Át Hgfz fT 44
3TTA 0
Hjelt-Buck, 1994 )A 3r 37444
Osterman &

3eH I 345 HE4fTAt (Osterman et. al. 1998)

fs 4aR GT 341C HHfHd GT }I
I s e , E T I (Owens, Shute &Slee, 2000)
IAT AGRTTA 4GT GI

(Australia ) 31f ye Y À 2G1 ItI

(Poland ), 3ecit R GTEgfrT
(Diener, 1969 )
8 HHT 4H3It qsd (Ziwardo, 1969 ) I SI^R
fest Rat
 631

(Prentice-Dunn &Rogers, 1980 ) #TT fs Tà 3 4

( confederate ) t ar arrmat frgarT T

fagarig f srtufaHET A

(4) qftfufas hUT ( Situational Causes )

fd U (situational causes ) hal IT 34 EUt fLf 4Ergut

TyG T(Lawton. 1972 ) 33fE 3T fruTT 4E E

(Baron, 1972 )TT

3
T (Bell, 1992 ) TT USTHT, qNHT TY4 (Anderson, Bushman & Groom, 1997 ) 44G I

sT faR far I3 Grif3t ZRT 45

(Anderson, Bushman &Groom 1977 ) 3TT4T

l R 31 # Hq q S4gt fehsi SHT qIG

(property crime ) T 434TY ( sex crime )
 G4 st YT
4 feTIS
Hif performance) world HoTCA (
3qHTH H qG0f4e T HAAI RHG t q34}1
&&
1967)Lepage, (Berkowitz T
4
available Cues Hebd( 3ufa aTATAKUT i)
H4CItGt environment in
He 47
gAT( participants
t ) (
HAT HEHTTd
f H)
FSTT HAT marijuana
ARgTT 1976) 1975, et
al., (Taylor
3744 3H f4TÁ Hyie *
t dy 34 3444
HEHIMY
HEIHF
AI(4 FdtT
àI h4oR functions cognitivehigher-order
)
3T TÌ YRUHA: 3T4 1998) Pihl, Giancola& (Hovken, f98
T 4E 3TT 34447
3AfA HfTTAYTf
fGIAT 3TGHT4Hl
TT HT 3f t , 4CUYT G
vocation ) G-IS fit
4t va1990)Cooper,
yHG,
48 Gustafson,
1990
) TET (
as HTqt 3Tf siqT nfeTr (Gy
ushman& qiH
FR T fH 34t )-s and
Drug (Alcohol
Rotton& ET( T14
g T 1997) Rotton. &
(Cohn r a TE 3TT 3r441# 32000) Cohn,
(unanswered
8 ) Aata
TaT
632
 633

arg z (Turner, 1977 ) eT v vh r

((Lepens & Perk, 1975 ) ft fuT
(iv) 3ATGT4hT Ha h s à afat (ndividual in form of cue of aggression )-4

(effective ) 76 taf# à f -t 3T51HT frU

Ha
4Eafrat (Berkowitz et.
al., 1967) T

T S dtHA (Douuerstein &Wilson, 1976 )TT0H (Geen, 1978 ) 3 4 f4 TT

o Measures of Preventingand Reducing Aggression )

ATATHG( aggression ) t HHTG RT0 AaIfS AER( undesirable behaviour )Á,3r :EHG

(target person ) ufr 3AIHHTI fZ AV TfE tfA f TIfTG fraR( expectedretaliation)

FTT (Dollard et al., 1939 )* 4z qdI f fTAIfT (expected retaliation )fa fET
19/6) TT (Rogers, 1983 ) 3r44-344 344 3TT R 4E AGrT f I YAT ya

ve | T É 3TATHGHI G¤ 3T Ti SIÍH(Donnerstein, 1972 ) 3rt 3 3TTR

 634

TRT t (Dengrink &Levendeski, 1972 ) 3t

2. fatu fafu ( Catharsis method ) S Hdifht 4Tf fT 3441 3TETET f t

faf( catharsis mehtod ) RT it T 3H fafy fat fT fH | TI ufr sryt 33T

H441f 341G540 HRU VIÊift 3tI(physiological arousal )1Z AI Hfq 3ETTSAT

4T f Traf
t Git 4 EI SI¥t àIST TT 3s (Doob &Wood, 1972 ) 7344 3444 4
3ATG64hd (immediate aggression ) # Ytq 3ATGH14Hi (future aggession ) 4FHT 3T GITI 3à

4T ÁHT G 341HJHGI fAg fyT foI GT HGIi T-4 ( Baron, 1977 )# 3747

1975 )
Stonner &Shope, 1975 )TT tT, S47 4 a46-10 (Ebbesen, Duncan & Konecani,

Sears, Maccoby &Lewin, 1957 )

3AI 3TG THGGHÍ yfafy 1a H41 T4TI4H, TET TT AfaH(

S # 34Hd| H pH (
a4, 4 T E 4(Baron, Byrne & Branscombe, 2006 ) à 344R
 635

(iii ) ¿s

(iv) ¿s

(i) gUS H HT HRRT AfUH arar èiy-UGTNE di (Sulzer-Azaroff &Mayer, 1984 )

[Link] GJUTH( Social learning apporach )-HHfJG ÁG 3YTT TIfrata IgR

a| t iààT TT 44T (Baron &Kepner, 1970 ) TE 3Z4A ÀSH TY ye f t

# fzg} Tà 3T1H TER HAfaG ( unrealistic )aà TT à r HT fã (trick ) RU

HEIfTT (Huesmann et., 1983 ) v T 3444 (field study ) +G 34447 afafr á AÁGHT ¢

(training) fE4T T4TI H4ET HHE (control group ) fo-a T ZigH V q 3TE514HGhll U fRHT

AHT EI 374 (meaning ) afd a hI HAU (perception ) ¢Hlgft (attitudes ) VRAGT

TAR 3ËSTETH% EI arAIRGAT (frequency) RT ÎAGT ( intensity ) H fAT T HGAI
5. Eraâ aIHeb aUT ETEA (Mild sexual arousal humor )ydt ( mild sexual arousal )
(assumption ) TE Têa afa UA âHHq ÀàReR gfaT( incompatible response ) ReR

(aggression ) H HÍ| t TT TT (Baron & Baal, 1974 ) *HÁT HYf 3 5

636

evaluation )

sTft ( Mueller && Donnerstein, 1977 ) t art 3rzr4 i rT

&
S0ft ( Donnerstein, 1983 ),
Evans,
vd sftât (Malmath & Donnerstein, 1982 ) a fr ). 1915
(Zillman, 1971 ) T IH 3f6 Jetafu 31 3Tt T fE

6. Vgyfa (Empathy )-g3 Td3uftht t T (Geen, 1972 ), 1 (Baron, 1975 ), à

A. HTqTTAT VÅVGJUTUT (Apology &Preattribution H4144 TA T VTZI

HS T (Ohbuchi, Kameda &Agarie, 1989 ) RT fGT Ts 3r47 4E HE 3T

fR 4HHF GÁ ( cognitive deficit )at, TÌ3HGAHGHGT H Z aNT

g4414 à 3fafraT YIGUURIqur ( preattribution ) î THH HEUETVUT
f feT HT 3-136T4H5 TER GT AIRUT S3EvYÍT ARU (unintentional causes ) H14T 8

yfe î peaaAT 3% HEfTrt (Mc Cullough et al., 2001 )À3rg* i TK E

aI< iga, fH T H0T ( Mc Cullough, Finchem&Tsang, 2003)À48
 637

3T-t H14f46 gfz ( mental satisfaction ) 7 fH 3TE-HHH (self-esteem ) E

EU 3 HEfT4t I THH GHE (tension) raT 34 àTIf T 6 (psychological well

2T , 3447 3AT4-4H (hígher self-esteem ) 4T UTHE TE (negative affect)AA R

( mood )TAT HA à HTHfaa a I