Refrigeration Leak and Tightness Testing
Refrigeration Leak and Tightness Testing
Refrigeration Technology
A overview
An i off th
theory and
d practice
ti
Contents:
1. Terms and Definitions
2. Geometry of a leakage – Influence of pressure difference and viscosity
3. Fundamentals of tightness testing
4. Refrigeration test procedures and their detection sensitivity
5. On-site leak testing devices and their detection sensitivity
6 Ti
6. Tightness
ht testing
t ti andd lleak
kddetection
t ti iin moderate-field
d t fi ld refrigerating
fi ti units
it and
d
their maintenance
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
l = 1mm = 1000 μm
Leak volume: V = 0.28x10-6 mm³
Particle number within the leak: 8x1010 molecule (80 billion)
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
d = 0.63 μm
l = 1mm = 1000 μm
Molecule size of R134a: max. 6.6x10-4 μm, i.e. 1000 times smaller than d !!!
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
Leakage
Molar rate
mass M
Leakage
Leckrate Lrate L (Mass ),flow)
( Massenstrom with
bezogen
regard
auf L= 1g to L = 1beig konstanter
R134a/a R134 a /Leck-
per
Year at constant
geometrie leak geometry
und konstantem Druck
and constant pressure
1,2
1,00 1,03
1,0 0,95
0 85
0,85 0 86
0,86
0,8 0,70
L iin g/a
0,6
0,4
0,21 0,20
0,2
0 03
0,03
0,0
R134a R125 R143a R152a R22 NH3 R290 He N2
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
Leak rate R134a at 0,5 bar super pressure: approx. 4kg per year
Leak rate R134a at 1,0 bar super pressure: approx. 10kg per year
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
Correct evaluation of detection sensitivity of the tightness test - i.e. leak search
device procedure
Especially important for the pressure
pressure-stand
stand tests (pressure drop tests) and the
vacuum pressure increase tests.
300
under
d ththe iindicated
di t d conditions
diti
[kg/a]
200
(V = 100 l; Endurance 10 h;
age rate
ckrate
100
R 134a
5
4
50 3
2
1 Temperatur-
Temperature
e ng
peΔ ta[K]u e cchange
a ge Δ t ((K))
0 0 änderung
änder
•The
Th testing-load
t ti l d di direction
ti d does nott correspondd tto th
the operation-load
ti l d di direction.
ti
•The test pressure does not correspond to the maximal allowed pressure.
• At the smallest test pressure , oil can close leaks and falsify the measuring through
gas release
release.
• Small leak rates during the vacuum pressure-increase tests correspond to larger
leak rates in the operation of the refrigeration technical products..
Hereby,
H b th
the refrigeration
fi ti system
t should
h ld b t d tto a pressure off ≤ 3 mbar
be evacuated b
and then approved to an increase of 1 mbar.
It is assumed
ass med that a pressure
press re gauge
ga ge is applied which
hich allo
allows
s the ssufficient
fficient precise
measurement of the pressures.
How large is the R 134a leak rate, indicated as mass flow, for a R134a super
pressure in a refrigeration system of 16 bar?
147kg R134a / a
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
It has to do with the first on-site leak detecting devices, which were available for the
proof of the FKW-refrigerant.
This device has to do with an on-site leak testing device which was developed
especially for the proof of FKW, and can sometimes still be found on the market.
Di
Disregarding
di exceptions,
ti thi
this iis characteristic
h t i ti ffor a d
device
i off th
the 2
2nd
d generation
ti
that it is not available for a sufficient long-term stability . Therefore, with this device
it is only possible in practical use to show the proof of leaks with leak rates of
> 30 g Refrigerant per year
year.
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
In order to fulfill the program of the research rates of refrigeration technique for the
improvement of the tightness of refrigerant-technical products around an order of
magnitude,
it d on-site it lleak
kddetecting
t ti d devices
i with
ith b
better
tt qualities
liti are needed.
d d
The main requirement lies in that, a leck rate of 3 g KM/a must be possible.
Development requirements for on-site leak testing devices of the 3rd generation
have been prepared and opened.opened First devices have already been offered and
must be examined.
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
Distance probe-leak: A = 3 mm
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
C it i
Criterion Number
N b D i Description
Device D i ti
of
Devices
Statistical detection sensitivity 8 to 10 Specs. have been fufilled by:
g to
sufficient and fufilled according L790a, TIF 5650, D-Tec, ITE 5750A,
the specifications of the GCR2P, Fluorotec 134, AN134,
manufacturer HI3001)
Are not suitable for applications in 2 to 10 FR 422N, EY 3820
the field of Refrigeration.
(ILK Approval criterion
(ILK-Approval-criterion statistical
proof 30 g/a not fulfilled)
ILK-Approval-criterion dynamic 6 to 10 Specs. have been fufilled by:
specification fulfilled L790a, TIF 5650, D- Tec, ITE 5750A,
Fluorotec 134, AN134
Have not been fulfill by:
GCR2P, FR 422N, EY 3820, HI 300
Long-term stability /reliability not 6 to 62) Deterioration with:
given L790a, TIF 5650, ITE 5750A,
Fluorotec 134,
134 AN 134
Improvement with: : D-Tec
No info : GCR2P
No tested : FR 422N, EY 3820, HI 300
Frequent 7 to 8 Affected devices are:
L790a, TIF 5650, ITE 5750A, GCR2P,
Fluorotec 134, HI 300, AN 134
Disruptions seldom to average 1 to 8 D- Tec
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
-The information about the qualities of the on-site leak indicator devices (in
brochures and operating manuals
manuals, the necessary information does not always
occur completely.) Pay attention to special features, for example, the realization
of the small distance probe-leak near devices with small air piping system
through the sensors.
sensors Most on
on-site
site leak indicator devices do not have an air-filter
air filter in
front of the sensors. Be aware of the great danger of contamination.
The detection sensitivity of the pressure endurance test (pressure drop test), the
vacuum pressure increase test and the soap bubble test are often over
over-valued.
valued
Therefore the following fact must be pointed out again and again:
The pressure endurance test and the vacuum pressure increase test are , as a
rule, in the field-moderate refrigeration system; only coarse tightness testing
where the fine tightness testing must follow with leak detecting devices.
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
If there is no practical, non-polluting solution for carrying out a leak detection on a mounted
refrigeration
fi ti unitit with
ith refrigerant-nitrogen
fi t it mixture
i t for
f construction
t ti conditions,
diti then,
th att least,
l t a
leak detection can be carried out with the refrigerant as working material with the saturation
pressure of the dominate temperature.
In this case, the refrigeration system has to be evacuated and charged with gaseous
refrigerant.
Concerning
C i ththe ttestt pressure thi
this represents
t indeed
i d d a compromise,
i h
however, iin accordance
d
to conditions and employed leak detection devices, it allows improvements of the detection
sensitivity in the order magnitude of 1000 to 10000 to be achieved.
If leaks are found, then only the relatively small amount of the gaseous refrigerant must be
pumped out. If no leaks are found, then the refrigeration system can be filled further to the
operating-moderate charging amount.
Leak detection and Tightness testing in Refrigeration
THANK YOU
FOR YOUR
ATTENTION!