0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views6 pages

CH 2

The document discusses the evolving landscape of corporate governance in Bangladesh, highlighting the impact of takeovers, mergers, and acquisitions (M&A) on companies and stakeholders. It outlines the pros and cons of takeovers, types of mergers, and various defenses against hostile takeovers, emphasizing the importance of competition law. Additionally, it addresses the implications of these changes for corporate management and the broader economy in Bangladesh as it integrates into the global market.

Uploaded by

Hasnat Imran
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
24 views6 pages

CH 2

The document discusses the evolving landscape of corporate governance in Bangladesh, highlighting the impact of takeovers, mergers, and acquisitions (M&A) on companies and stakeholders. It outlines the pros and cons of takeovers, types of mergers, and various defenses against hostile takeovers, emphasizing the importance of competition law. Additionally, it addresses the implications of these changes for corporate management and the broader economy in Bangladesh as it integrates into the global market.

Uploaded by

Hasnat Imran
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

CH-2

Corporate Governance: Changes in the Corporate World (Bangladeshi


Context)

This lecture talks about how corporate governance is changing, especially with takeovers
and more competition.

1. Uncertainty and Worry

Companies can't just make stakeholders happy anymore (like employees, customers).
They also face:

 Scandals: Hidden problems can damage a company's image.

o Example: A food company in Bangladesh secretly using harmful ingredients,


leading to a public health scare.

 Hostile Takeovers: Being bought by another company, even if management


doesn't want it.

2. Are Takeovers Good or Bad?

Opinions differ:

 Good: Fix poorly managed companies.

 Bad: Buyers profit at the public's expense.

3. Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)

 Acquisition: One company buys another, and the bought company disappears.

o Example: Beximco Pharma buying a smaller pharmaceutical company, which


then ceases to operate under its original name.

 Merger: Two companies join to form a new one.

o Example: Two insurance companies in Bangladesh combining to become a


larger, more competitive insurer.

4. M&A Trends

 The PDF mentions M&A trends in the USA.

 Key takeaway: M&A activity goes up and down depending on the economy.

Page 1 of 6
CH-2

5. Types of Mergers

 The PDF lists Horizontal, Vertical, etc.

 Horizontal: Gain market share (e.g., two telecom companies merging).

 Vertical: Control supply chain (e.g., a garment factory buying a dyeing mill).

 Diversified: Enter new industries (less common in Bangladesh).

6. Competition Law

 M&A is legal as long as it doesn't create monopolies or hurt competition.

7. Friendly vs. Hostile Takeover

 Friendly: Management approves the sale.

 Hostile: Management rejects, but buyer keeps trying.

o Bangladeshi Context: Hostile takeovers are not common in Bangladesh.


Deals are usually negotiated.

8. Difference: Friendly vs. Hostile

 Legally, no difference. Hostile takeovers are riskier as the buyer has less
information.

9. Hostile Takeovers & Leveraged Buyouts (LBOs)

 Takeover: One company buys another.

 LBO: Buying a company using mostly borrowed money.

o Bangladeshi Context: LBOs are not very common in Bangladesh.

10. Leveraged Buyout (LBO) Explained

 A firm buys a company using a small amount of its own money and a lot of debt.

 The company's cash flow is used to repay the debt.

11. How Hostile Takeovers Work

Page 2 of 6
CH-2

1. Raider: An investor tries to take over a company against management's will.

2. Private Equity Firms: These firms often handle LBOs.

12. Selecting a Target

 The raider thinks the target company's stock is undervalued.

13. Offer - The First Step

 The raider offers to buy a controlling share at a higher price. This is usually done
with borrowed money.

14. Raising Private Equity

 Private equity firms raise money through private equity funds.

15. Premium of Hostile Takeover

 Raiders usually pay 15-50% more than the current stock price.

 Golden Parachute: Payments to executives if they are forced out.

 The buyout is usually financed with a lot of debt.

16. Takeover Defenses

 Ways a company can protect itself.

 Pre-emptive: Steps taken before a threat.

 Reactionary: Steps taken after a threat.

 State intervention: Government action.

17. Pre-emptive Defenses

 Poison Pill: Making the company less attractive to a buyer.

o Example: Giving shareholders the right to buy the acquirer's stock at a


discount.

18. More Pre-emptive Defenses

Page 3 of 6
CH-2

 Supermajority Rules: Requiring a high percentage of shareholders to approve a


takeover.

 Staggered Boards: Electing only a few board members each year.

 Golden Parachute: Automatic payment to managers if they are ousted.

19. Reactionary Takeover Defenses

 Greenmail: Paying off the raider to go away.

 Convincing Shareholders: Arguing that the offer price is too low.

20. More Reactionary Defenses

 White Knight: Finding a friendly buyer to make a better offer.

21. Government Intervention

 Freeze Out Laws: Requiring a waiting period before a buyer can merge the target
with its own assets.

 Fair Price Laws: Ensuring all shareholders get the same price.

22. More State Interventions

 Poison Pill Endorsement Laws: Protecting poison pills.

 Control Share Acquisition: Requiring shareholder approval before a bidder can


vote his shares.

 Constituency Statute: Considering the interests of stakeholders like employees.

23. Post-Takeover Measures

 Management changes, cost-cutting, selling assets.

 The raider usually sells the company later (to another company, through an IPO,
etc.).

24. Who Gains and Who Loses?

 Gains: Raiders, original shareholders (if they sell early).

Page 4 of 6
CH-2

 Losses: Incumbent management, workers, potentially other stakeholders.

25. Impact on the Economy and Corporate Management

 Supporters: Takeovers improve management and make the economy more


competitive.

26. Advantages of Takeover

 Takeovers help control managers of large corporations.

27. Criticism of Takeover

 Not all takeovers are successful.

 Raids are often based on short-term profit.

28. More Criticism

 Gains may come at the expense of workers.

 High debt can lead to bankruptcy.

29. More Criticism

 Takeover doesn't always mean management is bad.

 The acquiring firm's stock price doesn't always increase.

30. More Criticism

 Takeover can contradict free market theory.

 Managers with big egos may engage in takeovers.

31. More Criticism

 The threat of takeover can lead to short-term focus.

 Companies may spend too much time fighting takeovers instead of improving their
business.

32. Conclusion

 The debate is about how well the market works.

Page 5 of 6
CH-2

 Takeovers can help keep management in check.

 Bangladeshi Context: While not as prevalent as in developed economies, these


concepts are relevant as Bangladesh's corporate sector grows and becomes more
integrated into the global economy. Strengthening corporate governance and
competition policy is important for sustainable economic development.

Page 6 of 6

You might also like