Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > astro-ph > arXiv:1001.0043

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Astrophysics > Earth and Planetary Astrophysics

arXiv:1001.0043 (astro-ph)
[Submitted on 1 Jan 2010 (v1), last revised 13 Jan 2010 (this version, v2)]

Title:Strong Constraints to the Putative Planet Candidate around VB 10 using Doppler spectroscopy

Authors:Guillem Anglada-Escude, Evgenya L. Shkolnik, Alycia J. Weinberger, Ian B. Thompson, David J. Osip, John H. Debes
View a PDF of the paper titled Strong Constraints to the Putative Planet Candidate around VB 10 using Doppler spectroscopy, by Guillem Anglada-Escude and 5 other authors
View PDF
Abstract: We present new radial velocity measurements of the ultra-cool dwarf VB 10, which was recently announced to host a giant planet detected with astrometry. The new observations were obtained using optical spectrographs(MIKE/Magellan and ESPaDOnS/CHFT) and cover a 63% of the reported period of 270 days. We apply Least-squares periodograms to identify the most significant signals and evaluate their corresponding False Alarm Probabilities. We show that this method is the proper generalization to astrometric data because (1) it mitigates the coupling of the orbital parameters with the parallax and proper motion, and (2) it permits a direct generalization to include non-linear Keplerian parameters in a combined fit to astrometry and radial velocity data. In fact, our analysis of the astrometry alone uncovers the reported 270 d period and an even stronger signal at 50 days. We estimate the uncertainties in the parameters using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach. The nominal precision of the new Doppler measurements is about 150 s$^{-1}$ while their standard deviation is 250 ms$^{-1}$. However, the best fit solutions still have RMS of 200 ms$^{-1}$ indicating that the excess in variability is due to uncontrolled systematic errors rather than the candidate companions detected in the astrometry. Although the new data alone cannot rule-out the presence of a candidate, when combined with published radial velocity measurements, the False Alarm Probabilities of the best solutions grow to unacceptable levels strongly suggesting that the observed astrometric wobble is not due to an unseen companion.
Comments: ApJ Letters, under revision. 15 pages, 3 figures and 2 tables. Author list updated
Subjects: Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP); Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM)
Cite as: arXiv:1001.0043 [astro-ph.EP]
  (or arXiv:1001.0043v2 [astro-ph.EP] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1001.0043
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/711/1/L24
DOI(s) linking to related resources

Submission history

From: Guillem Anglada-Escude [view email]
[v1] Fri, 1 Jan 2010 00:07:58 UTC (340 KB)
[v2] Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:47:46 UTC (340 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Strong Constraints to the Putative Planet Candidate around VB 10 using Doppler spectroscopy, by Guillem Anglada-Escude and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
astro-ph.EP
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2010-01
Change to browse by:
astro-ph
astro-ph.IM

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status