Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beloeil castel 1 Luc Viatour.jpg

File:Beloeil castel 1 Luc Viatour.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Sep 2010 at 12:28:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Beloeil castel 1 Luc Viatour.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Beloeil castel 1 Luc Viatour.jpg

•  Info created by -- Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by -- Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 12:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 12:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose change vote, see below really, really sorry about that oppose cause the picture is really nice. The Nikon D3S is a great camera and it is hard to believe that this picture is shot with F2.8 and ISO 3600. But why? Doesn't packed your tripod? This could be such an amazing picture but sadly the noise is visible, pretty less for iso3600, but visible. The sharpness over the whole scene could be better and the oe areas on the right side of the building are also not so nice. I really like the colors and the composition with the mirror effect but the technical problems make me oppose. Sorry, mathias K 14:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

A tripod in the water that does not work well ;) --Luc Viatour (talk) 05:27, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes thats true! I thought something like that cause of the very short focal length used on a full frame camera. Wasn't it possible to take the picture from the shore? I've checked the location on Google Earth and it looks like it would be possible, but I don't know the real situation there... bg mathias K 16:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

 Neutral thinking about it again and I think it is too good for oppose. The situation (taking the pic from a boat) is really hard and the reasult is pretty good! Greetings mathias K 10:03, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Support I do not see much noise here. --King of Hearts (talk) 07:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support A great shot indeed. I do not see any notable noise here. --Cayambe (talk) 08:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed, noise, colors. --Mile (talk) 11:19, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support very good picture Cody escadron delta (talk) 14:09, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - ditto to Mile - MPF (talk) 16:06, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I see little noise, and the colours are great. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:17, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 20:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 02:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support - Noise? What noise? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:30, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support beautifull picture, i don't see any noise --Croucrou (talk) 11:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Superb Rastrojo _(D•ES) 14:53, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 10:57, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Original and rare view. Very good to me.--Jebulon (talk) 10:46, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Noise levels are fine. I like the blue light. --Kabelleger (talk) 19:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:22, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture