Jump to content

User talk:Krano: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 71.82.2.5 - ""
No edit summary
Line 95: Line 95:


Quit removing the links I am adding. The are valid links for their Athletic websites. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.82.2.5|71.82.2.5]] ([[User talk:71.82.2.5|talk]]) 15:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Quit removing the links I am adding. The are valid links for their Athletic websites. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.82.2.5|71.82.2.5]] ([[User talk:71.82.2.5|talk]]) 15:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

I changed the Wesley Cook, aka "Mumia" page because passive voice, e.g., "mistakes were made," is not necessary after one has been convicted of murder, and the conviction upheld multiple times, by state and federal courts. As a law student, I understand what the words "claim" and "allege" mean, but many wikipedia editors do not, apparently. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania does not "claim" or "allege" that Faulkner was shot by Wesley Cook, it proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt, an endless claims of "new facts" are precisely that: claims, and allegations, and unverified statements. Your claim that my edit was unsourced is simply wrong. The findings of fact by the trial court, and its cited record, is sufficient. To suggest otherwise is to suggest facts do not exist, only competing voices, an this is directly counter to the principle of neutrality central to wikipedia.

Revision as of 15:09, 11 November 2014

Template:DailyBracketBot

Welcome!
User Page · Talk page · · Awards · · Edit count · Sandbox

Template:Archive box collapsible

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Sennecaster 170 0 0 100 17:20, 25 December 2024 4 days, 11 hoursno report
Hog Farm 2 171 14 12 92 02:47, 22 December 2024 0 days, 21 hoursno report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

I really wish that before you left such a harsh comment you should of watched the passing bells because if you had you would of known that@ does not stand for the twitter Symbol it stands for something completely different. So bitch please I now what I'm doing.

Georges Saupique and Louis Leygue

Thanks for looking over these two articles. I have decided not to change section in Georges Saupique article that dealt with war memorials. Hope this okay. Weglinde (talk) 10:12, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sorrrrrrry

I m really very sorry.I was just want to know that how to edit an article on wikipedia.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jitendrapradhan0903 (talkcontribs) 14:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

knowing some information

my many family members live in india and we live in pakistan and we want to know that who is giving you information about ameer minae his family members ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.189.133.225 (talk) 14:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

nothing, your edit was removed because it wasn't suitable content for a bio page Avono (talk) 14:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Correction

Hi, I understand that you are fat? . It was a challenge from our teacher to prove that wikipedia is a dependable source of knowledge. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:80C2:8C00:D481:2F14:F64D:22FA (talk) 19:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wallstreet jounal article... The doctor's battle, C6. Has a mention that lepoild was released due to his participation in a malaria drug test.

see above..sorry. new to this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ggotch (talkcontribs) 19:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the notice, sorry about that, please use an edit summary like you did afterwards so that doesn't happen to you againAvono (talk) 19:52, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

pointer

This page has been dramatically edited in the past months and doesn't truly represent the dog breed, its obviously for personal gain/gratification — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.88.109 (talk) 19:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

will you have to cite those additions to the article per the notice you got in your talk page. Avono (talk) 19:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You approved the page for Sector 62, noida. Kindly change n of noida to N so that it becomes Noida (it is a city name). Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aksj9211 (talkcontribs) 04:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Being serious

Do the MBAM thing and changing your password on another phone/computer. This stuff stays silent in the background until you remove it, and it could still be logging your keystrokes even now. It's not paranoia, it's common sense. If you didn't make the edit to the GamerGate page, it's very likely that you're compromised now. Tutelary (talk) 18:55, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will be doing that, especially the phone part, I wont be worrying if it happens though, the hash will be enough to prove my identity if I can no longer access this account Avono (talk) 19:03, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrenceville School

Hi, you reversed information that I had added on the Lawrenceville School page without being logged in, and I'm not familiar enough with the Wikipedia system to answer your message in some other way, so sorry to be starting another thread! I added the names and dates of the school's headmasters along with an explanation of our unique title system (calling heads "head master," two words, etc.) As the school's archivist, I know the information is correct but I don't believe the information is up on our website or anything. How should I handle citing non-web sources?

Thanks -- I'm a newbie at actually editing anything on Wikipedia.

Jacqueline Haun. Jehaun (talk) 21:20, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

print sources should be fine, uncited content can't be added because Wikipedia is not a place for original research (i.e you know who the headmaster is and therefore insert him into the article)
(If no print sources are available mybe have them inserted in your school website?) Avono (talk) 21:29, 10 November 2014 (UTC).[reply]

I was just sending an email to the Communications department asking them to add the info to the school webiste that to make my life easier, so we'll see! Do you still have the draft of what I added? I have the school head dates, but I crafted the explanation of the headmaster terms on the fly. If the draft is still around and you could send me a copy, that would be a big help to my getting it up on the school website. (Although I'll rewrite it if I have to!) Thanks for your help.

Jehaun (talk) 21:36, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft can be viewed here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lawrenceville_School&diff=633278195&oldid=632332313, your welcome Avono (talk) 21:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for not only reverting the vandalism on my user page, but for beating me to at least a half dozen other reverts. Keep up the good work. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 14:53, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quit removing the links I am adding. The are valid links for their Athletic websites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.82.2.5 (talk) 15:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the Wesley Cook, aka "Mumia" page because passive voice, e.g., "mistakes were made," is not necessary after one has been convicted of murder, and the conviction upheld multiple times, by state and federal courts. As a law student, I understand what the words "claim" and "allege" mean, but many wikipedia editors do not, apparently. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania does not "claim" or "allege" that Faulkner was shot by Wesley Cook, it proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt, an endless claims of "new facts" are precisely that: claims, and allegations, and unverified statements. Your claim that my edit was unsourced is simply wrong. The findings of fact by the trial court, and its cited record, is sufficient. To suggest otherwise is to suggest facts do not exist, only competing voices, an this is directly counter to the principle of neutrality central to wikipedia.