recommend use of cbcs #109
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
alexismt73
reviewed
May 7, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should a similar recommendation also apply to the partial vs full encryption support? That is, instead of the text requiring that "All combinations such that this is true SHALL be supported, including crypt_byte_block = 10 and skip_byte_block = 0.", only partial encryption (10%) is mandatory and all other forms are optional, i.e. "Combination crypt_byte_block = 1 and skip_byte_block=9 SHALL be supported. Other combinations, including crypt_byte_block = 10 and skip_byte_block = 0, MAY also be supported."
|
Merging this PR per resolution of today's AOM Codec WG call. Note that the discussion about the recommended pattern is moved to a coming PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.