Property talk:P932
Documentation
identifier for a scientific work issued by PubMed Central (without "PMC" prefix)
Description | w:PubMed Central is a free digital database of full-text scientific literature in biomedical and life sciences - PubMed Central (Q229883) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Represents | PMCID (Q11801904) | ||||||||||||
Associated item | PubMed Central (Q229883) | ||||||||||||
Has quality | numeric identifier (Q93868746) | ||||||||||||
Data type | External identifier | ||||||||||||
Domain | According to this template:
sources
According to statements in the property:
When possible, data should only be stored as statementswork of science (Q11826511), article (Q191067), book review (Q637866) or publication (Q732577) | ||||||||||||
Allowed values | [1-9]\d+ | ||||||||||||
Example | EVOLUTION IN MENDELIAN POPULATIONS (Q5418627) → 1201091 A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes (Q13416674) → 3682911 | ||||||||||||
Source | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ | ||||||||||||
Formatter URL | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC$1 http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC$1 | ||||||||||||
Tracking: usage | Category:Pages using Wikidata property P932 (Q55927982) | ||||||||||||
Related to country | United States of America (Q30) (See 771 others) | ||||||||||||
See also | PubMed publication ID (P698), PMC journal ID (P12834) | ||||||||||||
Lists | |||||||||||||
Proposal discussion | Proposal discussion | ||||||||||||
Current uses |
| ||||||||||||
Search for values |
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P932#Type Q11826511, Q191067, Q637866, Q732577, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P932#Single value, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P932#Unique value, SPARQL (every item), SPARQL (by value)
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P932#Item P1476, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P932#Item P1433, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P932#Item P577, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P932#Conflicts with P31, SPARQL
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P932#Entity types
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P932#Scope, SPARQL
Pattern ^PMC([1-9]\d{0,7})$ will be automatically replaced to \1. Testing: TODO list |
This property is being used by:
Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.) |
|
|
Pattern ^PMC([1-9]\d{0,7})$ will be automatically replaced to \1. Testing: TODO list |
Expected completeness
editIn light of Wikidata:Requests for permissions/Bot/LargeDatasetBot, I'd like to open a discussion about expected completeness (P2429) of PMC publication ID (P932). It is currently set to always incomplete (Q21873886), but this can be interpreted in several ways, which can lead to confusion. I would suggest to keep this value only for items where publication date (P577) is in the current year or in the future, and that we strive to have past years complete (and ideally months, weeks or days, but the indexing of an article in PubMed Central can take anywhere between a day and several months after publication and sometimes even years). The different treatment of individual time periods could be modeled by mechanisms like using applies to part (P518) as a qualifier to the expected completeness (P2429) statements, or similar. Note that most publications that have a PMC publication ID (P932) also have a PubMed publication ID (P698) and a DOI (P356), and several services are available to cross-walk between these identifiers, but such cross-walks are not always smooth. --Daniel Mietchen (talk) 02:36, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, please finish the import ;) --- Jura 06:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)