Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
Digitizing
via the centered second-order difference
[Eq.(7.5)]
we obtain the following explicit finite-difference scheme (§D.1):
where
is the external input vector for exciting the string
(driving three adjacent masses in simulations to date).
Note that requiring three adjacent spatial string samples to be in
contact with the piano hammer during the attack (which helps to
suppress aliasing of spatial frequencies on the string during the
attack) implies a sampling rate in the vicinity of 6 megahertz
[267]. Thus, the model is expensive to compute!
However, results to date show a high degree of accuracy, as desired.
In particular, the stretching of the partial overtones in the
stiff-string model of
Fig.
has
been measured to be highly accurate despite using only three spring
attachment points on one side of each mass disk [267].
See [53] for alternative finite-difference formulations
that better preserve physical energy and have other nice properties
worth considering.
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy] [Comment on this page via email]