Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/09/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
potentially copyright violation from meinestadt.de Berthold Werner (talk) 07:28, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 10:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
potentially copyright violation from meinestadt.de Berthold Werner (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 10:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
potentially copyright violation, scan from psotcard Berthold Werner (talk) 07:30, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 10:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
potentially copyright violation from meinestadt.de Berthold Werner (talk) 07:28, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 10:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
potentially copyright violation from meinestadt.de Berthold Werner (talk) 07:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 10:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
potentially copyright violation, scan from psotcard Berthold Werner (talk) 07:30, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 10:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Improper license (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dahlstroms/257173802/) Two Hearted River (talk) 00:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: all rights reserved Denniss (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Improper license (http://www.flickr.com/photos/dahlstroms/252546421/in/pool-1359999@N20/) Two Hearted River (talk) 00:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: All rights reserved Denniss (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
No evidence of license, previously published (http://bleacherreport.com/articles/395020-the-20-most-hilarious-athlete-quotes-ever/page/7) Two Hearted River (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: All rights reserved at Flickr Denniss (talk) 14:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Screenshot from Google Ramisses (talk) 02:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: +speedy req on day of upload by uploader[1] Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Screenshot from Google Ramisses (talk) 02:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: +speedy-req on day of upload by uploader[2] Túrelio (talk) 16:00, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Commons doesn't allow fair use. 190.25.102.163 05:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Speedy delete copyvio, non-free logo--Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 15:59, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Infrogmation (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Similar images are everywhere in internet: http://www.google.com.br/search?q=%22monique+evans%22&tbnh=137&tbnw=182&hl=pt-BR&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbs=simg:CAESHwmug0Tk0RAVsRoLCxCo1NgEGgIIFwwhQJQJUvVk70Q&tbm=isch&prmd=ivnsuo&tbas=0&source=lnt&sa=X&ei=WORoTtKzO9CSgQels53cDA&ved=0CBIQpwUoAA&biw=1276&bih=783. It's part of an essay for Gypsy magazine. Yanguas (talk) 15:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Taken from the web, not the uploaders own work. Martin H. (talk) 19:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Ukraine. This photograph is a derivative work of the sculptor's copyright and must be deleted. 195.110.6.202 08:25, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- A trout for this Tatar nationalist: the architect, en:Ivan Fomin, died in 1936. Construction began in 1934 and was completed after his death. NVO (talk) 10:09, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Keep per NVO. Alredy public domain (more than 70 years). -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 17:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Author died in 1936, more than 70 years ago ⇒ It's PD-old Anatoliy (talk) 23:48, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Няма да бъде използван в рамките на УИКИПЕДИЯ Context Wiki Upload (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Per uploader's request: the file is not going to be used in Wikipedia due to unresolved copyright issues. →Spiritia 11:01, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Няма да бъде използван в рамките на УИКИПЕДИЯ Context Wiki Upload (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Per uploader's request: the file is not going to be used in Wikipedia due to unresolved copyright issues. →Spiritia 11:01, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Poster for a movie containing copyrighted images Tabercil (talk) 04:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by Tabercil. Yann (talk) 20:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Commons doesn't allow fair use. 190.25.102.163 05:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by Infrogmation. Yann (talk) 20:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
potentially copyright violation Berthold Werner (talk) 07:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jcb. Yann (talk) 20:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log) The name is wrong. It was be "Paint", no "Piant" Blackvienna (talk) 19:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, pretty clear copyvio -- Liliana-60 (talk) 20:52, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio, per Liliana-60 Trycatch (talk) 23:47, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Delete
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
personal image Huntingg (talk) 22:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: This is the third time you've nominated it. An admin will get to it, please be patient. Missvain (talk) 00:15, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. Yann (talk) 21:18, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 00:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep "Orphaned" is not a reason for deletion. I disagree that there is no foreseeable use for his photo -- it seems that he is a public enough person for Commons (google him -- there are BBC and ITN reports about him). Trycatch (talk) 00:54, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Use is forseeable, and the licence is not in question. Courcelles (talk) 03:30, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 00:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Useful picture of water supply in the third world. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 16:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per Herby. Article may have been out of scope, but photo seems unobjectionable and potentially useful illustration in different contexts. Infrogmation (talk) 19:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 00:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep No reason to deletion. Licence is good. --Starscream (talk) 09:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I am confused about reasons for deletion. Commons does not delete images because they are not used for a moment. It is a good quality photograph with unambiguous license - the fact that someone deleted an article using it does not make it "unusable for any educational purpose". See Commons:Project scope. --Jarekt (talk) 13:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep "Not used" is no reason for deletion. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 16:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Logo of some sort, used in a now deleted advert on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 00:41, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Missvain (talk) 03:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:32, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Ukraine. This photograph is a derivative work of the sculptor's copyright and must be deleted. 195.110.6.202 08:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete This is not DM --Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 16:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:33, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
This is a copyright, the tower was built in 1970, so about 40 years ago. The architects are dead some years later, not 70 years ago like the Franch law requires. Sebleouf (talk) 08:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:33, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 08:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Delete. Happy to see the logo category getting cleaned a bit :) (Now we just need to look at screenshots!) Missvain (talk) 13:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 08:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Missvain (talk) 13:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 08:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Missvain (talk) 13:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Company logo used for advertisement. Out of scope. Jafeluv (talk) 08:49, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The description calls them "creative maniacs" <3 Missvain (talk) 13:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
We have much nicer and sexier photos of flacid dicks. Please delete this photo; its appearance in the penis-categories is inappropriate due to the very low image quality. Besides, it is quite doubtful that this photo is the own work of the uploader because of this low MPixel-number 79.237.184.2 10:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Missvain (talk) 13:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per “Commons does not need you to drop your pants and grab a camera.“ http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Nudity --Hold and wave (talk) 21:23, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Unused logo for some music group. Even if uploader did create this logo (unlikely), music group is apparently non-notable so this is out of COM:SCOPE. Wknight94 talk 13:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Missvain (talk) 13:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
copyvio from this photo series www.purenudism.com/free/nude-indoor-pool.html 88.65.196.97 14:24, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Comment Image is not seen at link you provide. Perhaps it is only visible with paid membership? I note this photo has been on Wikimedia since 2008 and has long been displayed on nudism related articles in multiple Wikimedia projects. What indication do you have that this image was taken from that site rather than vice versa? What if any attribution is given to the photo at that site? Infrogmation (talk) 18:41, 8 September 2011 (UTC)- Delete. A search with the web archive shows that photos from this series were already on the external website in February 2008, although the user uploaded them here only in October 2008. See the other uploads by this user. Then see for example this page at the web archive. If the exact same photos are not displayed on the limited preview available on that page, photos from the same series are still easily identifiable by the same people and locations, for example the guy with the chin beard, the girl with the heart-shaped medallion, the girl cooking the hot dogs, etc. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:09, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment If the uploads seem to belong to the same series, could we imagine that the uploader is the author and would have released it on several websites (including Commons) ? It's hard to prove, I guess, but it's a possibility. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:24, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment I sent the uploader a series of questions two years ago with no response. I was uncomfortable about one of his excellect images as the lighting and shadow was wrong unless it was a posed shot. He has only uploaded four images: and each of the same friendship group all on the 11th September 2008. However we cannot prove it is a copyvio yet- that is the test we are applying.--ClemRutter (talk) 12:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I hate to take this course of action, but the nudism galleries at purenudism.com don't appear to be user-submitted. While it's still possible that the uploader really is the photographer, we need stronger evidence than just a claim of own work. Powers (talk) 12:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per Nom --Hold and wave (talk) 21:22, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom and per Powers. Missvain (talk) 21:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
and other penis uploads by Brusthaar1995 (talk · contribs). What is Commons still missing? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per user. Missvain (talk) 20:35, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:37, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
and other uploads by Fajar tri purnama (talk · contribs). Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Missvain (talk) 20:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:38, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
The architect, Edouard Monestès is dead in 1944. This building is protected by copyright because there isn't FoP in France. Sebleouf (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for artworks in the United States Lymantria (talk) 21:30, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Delete per nom. Missvain (talk) 00:14, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete idem. Nixón (wop!) 22:08, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:45, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use FASTILY (TALK) 00:43, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep useful sports picture. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 16:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: How do you know he won't become notable? 99of9 (talk) 11:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned screen shot for photography website Missvain (talk) 03:06, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Would need OTRS from the website owners. Likely copyvio. 99of9 (talk) 12:00, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Image has lacked description, source, author, and category since 2007. Small size, orphaned and has two licenses. Missvain (talk) 03:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Amusingly, I was actually clicking through to nom this before I noticed you had already done so. Kgorman-ucb (talk) 04:01, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio http://eetac.upc.edu/ca/node/53 (btw multiple licenses are no problem, it means the user can choose which license they use it under) 99of9 (talk) 12:02, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
And another orphaned "personal image" text box from Babsy Missvain (talk) 04:12, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete The text translates as "My projects and work in progress". Unused and non-educational. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:55, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: text only images are specifically mentioned in COM:SCOPE as out of scope 99of9 (talk) 12:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Personal portrait. No description or source. Orphaned. Missvain (talk) 04:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom, web search of this name didn't show anyone notable 99of9 (talk) 12:08, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Screen shot of a youtube video. Out of scope? Missvain (talk) 04:28, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: terrible quality, all I can make out is the youtube logo! 99of9 (talk) 12:09, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Small, orphaned image of an undescribed house with no date, nor "author". Missvain (talk) 04:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: the author's only other image was a copyvio... COM:PRP 99of9 (talk) 12:13, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Commond doesn't allow fair use. 190.25.102.163 04:45, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: in copyright 99of9 (talk) 12:14, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Commons doesn't allow Fair Use. 190.25.102.163 04:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo 99of9 (talk) 12:22, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
This file is unnecessary and already have a version on SVG Juancameneses11 (talk) 03:47, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Deleted as duplicate of File:Logo EPM.svg. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:22, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Commons doesn't allow fair use. 190.25.102.163 05:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. Doesn't satisfy PD-textlogo 99of9 (talk) 12:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
« Copyright CLOSER » Nemoi a parlé le 12:06, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Missvain (talk) 13:09, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Kirtap (talk) 14:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 10:06, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Small, orphaned screen shot? powerpoint? not sure exactly. Missvain (talk) 03:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 23:33, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
low resolution screen shot, orphaned, for private company. Missvain (talk) 03:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 23:33, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Does not consist solely of simple geometric shapes. Not ineligible for copyright protection. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:55, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Too complex for PD-Text Courcelles (talk) 23:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
unused personal image, poor photoshopping - out of scope Santosga (talk) 14:11, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; looks like orphan private joke image; uncategorized since 2008. Infrogmation (talk) 19:45, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 23:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
No proof that the uploader is the creator of the logo and that the logo is licensed under CC-3.0 Share alike. Badzil (talk) 15:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, According to the 2011 INTERNATIONAL DRAGON CLASS RULES 9.14 [Dragon Class rules]: "The Class Insignia as shown below shall be positioned on the mainsail in accordance with RRS [Racing Rules of Sailing]: Appendix G." Since Dragon sails are free to make by anyone, the insignia is also available for anyone. VYGOcommons (talk) 17:42, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- This doesn't answer any of the questions raised above. Badzil (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- How can I proof that I created this file? Besides that it is not a logo but a class symbol!
- I'd say that this appears to be simple enough that {{PD-ineligible}} applies. It's basically just a "D" with a line under it. – Adrignola talk 14:46, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK. I will alter the description to reflect that. Badzil (talk) 14:55, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
- This doesn't answer any of the questions raised above. Badzil (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Keep after modification of the description. Badzil (talk) 15:03, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
No proof that the uploader is the creator of the Dragon class logo and that the logo is licensed under CC-3.0 Share alike.
The original version of this image does not have this problem. Badzil (talk) 15:28, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, According to the 2011 INTERNATIONAL DRAGON CLASS RULES 9.14 [Dragon Class rules]: "The Class Insignia as shown below shall be positioned on the mainsail in accordance with RRS [Racing Rules of Sailing]: Appendix G." Since Dragon sails are free to make by anyone, the insignia is also available for anyone. Besides this, in this line drawing the use of the insignia is just as essential as the dimensions of the sails, the shape of the hull or the position of the mast to represent a Dragon (Keelboat). VYGOcommons (talk) 17:46, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- This doesn't answer any of the questions raised above. Badzil (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- How can I proof that I created this file? Besides that it is not a logo but a class symbol!
- This doesn't answer any of the questions raised above. Badzil (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Keep after modification of the description of the Dragon class logo. Badzil (talk) 15:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
No proof that the uploader is the creator of the logo and that the logo is licensed under CC-3.0 Share alike. Badzil (talk) 15:31, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, According to the 2011 INTERNATIONAL DRAGON CLASS RULES 9.14 [Dragon Class rules]: "The Class Insignia as shown below shall be positioned on the mainsail in accordance with RRS [Racing Rules of Sailing]: Appendix G." Since Dragon sails are free to make by anyone, the insignia is also available for anyone. VYGOcommons (talk) 17:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- This doesn't answer any of the questions raised above. Badzil (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- How can I proof that I created this file? Besides that it is not a logo but a class symbol!VYGOcommons (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- This doesn't answer any of the questions raised above. Badzil (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Keep after modification of the description. Badzil (talk) 15:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Missvain (talk) 20:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 23:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
out of scope - self promotion Cabayi (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 04:04, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
logo of football club, copyright protected Miho (talk) 22:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete it's an evidently copyright violation. Nixón (wop!) 22:10, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 23:28, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Ukraine. This photograph is a derivative work of the sculptor's copyright and must be deleted. 195.110.6.202 08:22, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Only part of monument on the image. Does not falls to NOFOP Anatoliy (talk) 11:52, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Ukraine. This photograph is a derivative work of the sculptor's copyright and must be deleted. 195.110.6.202 08:23, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Sculptor?? This doesn't look very much like a sculpture to me! -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 17:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Not sculpture. Anatoliy (talk) 12:19, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned television screen shot diagram, possibly out of scope. Missvain (talk) 00:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Ben.MQ (talk) 22:51, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 00:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep a nice picture. Trycatch (talk) 00:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No specific indication of the educational value Ben.MQ (talk) 22:53, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. probably copyrighted. FASTILY (TALK) 00:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Ben.MQ (talk) 22:53, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 00:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Illustrates some symptoms of hiv/aids. Good quality. --99of9 (talk) 11:55, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Per 99of9 Ben.MQ (talk) 22:53, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use FASTILY (TALK) 00:41, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Person is not recognisable. Ben.MQ (talk) 22:55, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Hope,_BC_-_Friendship_Garden_plaque.jpg InverseHypercube (talk) 01:21, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Image different, and more importantly different license. The nominated image may be considered of worse quality but it is cc-0 Ben.MQ (talk) 22:59, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
FOP applies only to the PRoC, not the ROC (a.k.a Taiwan). Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- That's good to know. I guess it should be deleted on Commons and reduced/given rationale on the English Wikipedia, then. The following files on Commons would then be eligible for deletion as well:
- File:Taiwan 2009 Garden of the Generalissimos at CiHu Mausoleom of Chiang Kai Shek in TaoYuan County FRD 7888.jpg
- File:Taiwan 2009 Garden of the Generalissimos at CiHu Mausoleom of Chiang Kai Shek in TaoYuan County FRD 7879.jpg
- File:Taiwan 2009 Garden of the Generalissimos at CiHu Mausoleom of Chiang Kai Shek in TaoYuan County FRD 7870.jpg
- File:Taiwan 2009 Garden of the Generalissimos at CiHu Mausoleom of Chiang Kai Shek in TaoYuan County FRD 7845.jpg
- File:CKS.jpg
- --Gyrobo (talk) 02:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment -perhaps we should ascertain who the authors are, as they may be free depending on the time of their author's death per {{PD-China}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Look, the images in question are pictures of statues that were going to be thrown away, melted, or otherwise desecrated by the people of Taiwan. Most statues were destroyed. The surviving ones ended up in this park. These statues were commissioned in all cases by the government using public funds to commemorate a leader the majority of people in Taiwan no longer care about. I don't think there will ever be a copyright problem concerning these statues. But whatever. Fred Hsu (talk) 04:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Waste no time - move to Flickr. It's not the first time when already lost or decaying heritage was deleted on commons. NVO (talk) 05:24, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: But the 4 files mentioned by Gryrobo were kept as COM:DM. Not likely {{PD-China}} because the mausoleom was constructed in 1975. Ben.MQ (talk) 23:09, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Contains a watermark contradicting the stated licensing terms. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Unfree file grabbed from the web. Martin H. (talk) 12:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned image that has lacked description since 2007. Possibly out of scope? Missvain (talk) 03:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Queeg (talk) 17:07, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:39, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Non-notable group of people speaking in a group. Low quality, No author, seems to lack in educational quality. Possibly out of scope? Missvain (talk) 03:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:39, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Promotional photograph of non-notable band. Orphaned since upload. Missvain (talk) 03:25, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:40, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Promotional photograph. oprhaned since upload. Missvain (talk) 03:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Promotional photograph. Out of scope. Missvain (talk) 03:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Queeg (talk) 17:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned logo. Website states copyright. Missvain (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Summary states its a personal image. Orphaned, it's in French, not sure what it says.. Missvain (talk) 04:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Queeg (talk) 17:06, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:42, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Promotional material for jazz festival from 2008. Missvain (talk) 04:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Queeg (talk) 17:05, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:42, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Personal vacation photograph. Doesn't appear educational in value. Out of scope? (I'm doing categorization, hence the bombardment of deletion requests ;) ) Missvain (talk) 04:18, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- I think that it's a photograph of a sign with a map about the "Great Brda Canal", which has a page on the Polish Wikipedia (Google translation), so it might have some educational value. WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Queeg (talk) 17:05, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:43, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Small poorly described unknown location with no source, author, date, and orphaned. Missvain (talk) 04:44, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Queeg (talk) 17:13, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio from http://sandbach.de/ (http://sandbach.de/sandbach.JPG). Rosenzweig τ 12:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Promotional material with copyrighted illustration. Missvain (talk) 04:46, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Queeg (talk) 17:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:44, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Poor image quality, similar file already exists as "File:Hampshire_College_logo.svg" Simtropolitan (talk) 06:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor duplicate George Chernilevsky talk 13:45, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Self promotional pic. Out of scope. P199 (talk) 14:32, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:47, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope. File is not used. High Contrast (talk) 15:32, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 13:48, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
There is no FOP in France COM:FOP#France (Pas de liberté de panorama en France) PierreSelim (talk) 08:24, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Qu'est-ce à dire par rapport à l'Art. 5 de la Déclaration des Droits de l'Homme et du citoyen de 1789 : La Loi n'a le droit de défendre que les actions nuisibles à la Société. Tout ce qui n'est pas défendu par la Loi ne peut être empêché, et nul ne peut être contraint à faire ce qu'elle n'ordonne pas ? --Ambre Troizat (talk) 22:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per request. Coyau (talk) 18:17, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
« The night-time light display is protected under copyright » as write in Category:Eiffel Tower at night VIGNERON (talk) 18:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
The court case - via Google Translate- is quite limited. It was about:
- "Whereas June 17, 1989, the company "The Image Mode" introduced in the 100th anniversary of the construction of the Eiffel Tower, a "sound and visual spectacle" consisting in particular of the effects of lighting of the tower by a combination of ramps and projectors, along with image projections and fireworks; that companies Publishing Is Protet and Editions Lyna-were carried out by Mr. Y ... photographs of this show, from which they have manufactured and marketed a series of postcards;"
that is a series of photos that attempted to give the gist of a dynamic light show with fireworks. Note that there is a concept of De minimus in the French law.
- Keep - this photo doesn't seem to be about the protected sound and light show - just a non-dynamic picture of the tower at night from an odd angle. Smallbones (talk) 19:21, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per request. Coyau (talk) 18:19, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
No description or author (presumed to be user), lacks educational use, orphaned since upload. Missvain (talk) 04:34, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- This is not a valid reason for deletion. Ruslik (talk) 11:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: Well, if you think it's educational enough, I have no problem keeping it. *shrug* :) Missvain (talk) 13:02, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: kept per Ruslik. Trycatch (talk) 07:15, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
This is copyright because the architect, Adolphe Dervaux, died in 1945, so 67 years ago. Not 70. Sebleouf (talk) 07:41, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
You are right. I guess I'lll have to wait 3 years before submitting again. There was already one photo, so maybe it should be removed too. BTW http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gare_de_Rouen-Rive-Droite states that the station started operating in 1847, more than 20 years before Adolphe Dervaux was born. Davitof (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Many stations have been reduilded, dut to the success of railways. Trizek here or on fr:wp 17:24, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. Trycatch (talk) 07:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Copyvio, image is already present on several websites, like here. Bill william comptonTalk 13:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Courcelles Trycatch (talk) 07:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Clearly a professional photographic work, highly doubt over the authenticity of uploader's claim, means copyvio. Bill william comptonTalk 13:11, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Courcelles Trycatch (talk) 07:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Clearly a professional photographic work, highly doubt over the authenticity of uploader's claim, means copyvio. Bill william comptonTalk 13:12, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Courcelles Trycatch (talk) 07:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Clearly a professional photographic work, highly doubt over the authenticity of uploader's claim, means copyvio. Bill william comptonTalk 13:12, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Courcelles Trycatch (talk) 07:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Clearly a professional photographic work, highly doubt over the authenticity of uploader's claim, means copyvio. Bill william comptonTalk 13:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Courcelles Trycatch (talk) 07:20, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Commons doesn't allow fair use. 190.25.102.163 05:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Non-free logo. ■ MMXX talk 02:17, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Commons doesn't allow fair use. This song wasn't created by the user Juancameneses11. 190.25.102.163 05:09, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio ■ MMXX talk 02:21, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Commons doesn't allow fair use. 190.25.102.163 05:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep PD-textlogo ■ MMXX talk 02:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 19:08, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Commons doesn't allow fair use. 190.25.102.163 05:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Not Simple enough to be PD. ■ MMXX talk 02:25, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo Jcb (talk) 19:09, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Unlikely to by own work: small resolution. May be game screenshot or book illustration. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 19:18, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: Self-promotion. The file was used in a self-promotion article in eswiki. —Fitoschido [shouttrack] \\ 11 September, 2011 [13:40]
Deleted: Out of scope. Pruneautalk 10:26, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope: self-promotion. —Fitoschido [shouttrack] \\ 8 September, 2011 [06:36] 06:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. Pruneautalk 10:27, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama for modern sculptures in USA. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Pruneautalk 10:29, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
The architects, Gustave and Auguste Perret are dead in 1952 and 1954. Their buildings are protected by copyright because there isn't FoP in France. Sebleouf (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, not a photo of the whole building but just a detail ; the ceramist is Alexandre Bigot and died in 1927. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:20, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
The architects, Gustave and Auguste Perret are dead in 1952 and 1954. Their buildings are protected by copyright because there isn't FoP in France. Sebleouf (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, not a photo of the whole building but just a detail ; the ceramist is Alexandre Bigot and died in 1927. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:20, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
The architects, Gustave and Auguste Perret are dead in 1952 and 1954. Their buildings are protected by copyright because there isn't FoP in France. Sebleouf (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, not a photo of the whole building but just a detail ; the ceramist is Alexandre Bigot and died in 1927. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:21, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep per Vigneron, a small detail of the building. MKFI (talk) 17:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
The architects, Gustave and Auguste Perret are dead in 1952 and 1954. Their buildings are protected by copyright because there isn't FoP in France. Sebleouf (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:25Bis-B.Franklin-P16-012.jpg Pruneautalk 10:31, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
The architects, Gustave and Auguste Perret are dead in 1952 and 1954. Their buildings are protected by copyright because there isn't FoP in France. Sebleouf (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, not a photo of the whole building but just a detail ; the ceramist is Alexandre Bigot and died in 1927. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:21, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Self promotional pic. Out of scope. P199 (talk) 14:32, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 22:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
wrong file name Nogginkj (talk) 18:35, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: use {{Rename}} instead Jcb (talk) 17:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 00:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep (no prejudice against copyright/copyvio review for this and other files from user:Mochatern). "At risk" tagline may be unnecessary, but the photo is a good illustration of her race, clothing, perhaps living conditions too. Unfortunately it does not tell her ethnicity, but it still in scope for, say, en:People of Ethiopia, or en:Demographics of Ethiopia. NVO (talk) 05:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Concur with NVO. --P199 (talk) 21:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
Kept, Total Lunar Eclipse (talk) 06:43, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use FASTILY (TALK) 00:42, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Image of a soccer player may have its educational value - English Wikipedia has a strict policy for notability but elsewhere may differ. Commons do not need to follow enwp's notability standard.--Ben.MQ (talk) 22:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: seems not notable, so out of scope Jcb (talk) 20:57, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. likely copyrighted FASTILY (TALK) 00:43, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- comment The page makes a reasonable claim that it is a GPL program, so I doubt copyright is an issue. --99of9 (talk) 11:57, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 20:58, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Personal Image Huntingg (talk) 01:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
this should be deleted
- Delete Low quality, personal photo. Requester is the original uploader, btw. Missvain (talk) 03:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Mistake! This should be deleted
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Personal Image 203.104.11.14 01:13, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, unusable and rfd by upl. Túrelio (talk) 06:32, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
http://www.icty.org/sections/Copyrightandconditionsofuse/Copyright says "none of these photographs may be used... without written permission from the publisher." Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:35, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: The file source says the source was moved here, which states: "Copyright: Most of these pictures are ICTY photographs and are copyright free. If you reproduce any of these images, please provide the following credit: "Courtesy of the ICTY". Pictures taken by non-ICTY photographers may not be reproduced or transmitted without the photographer's written permission (contact details appear on the print version of the relevant pictures)." Missvain (talk) 03:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 22:46, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Self promotional material uploaded by the ProPaz organization. Missvain (talk) 04:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Queeg (talk) 17:05, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 22:47, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Scanned image of an undated, undescribed, orphaned, uncited, no author postcard. Missvain (talk) 04:41, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- At least it is a bit described as a Aigburth Rd in Liverpool--Avron (talk) 19:28, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:06, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Poor image quality, similar file already exists as "File:Hampshire_College_logo.svg" Simtropolitan (talk) 06:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
If indeed "File:Hampshire_College_logo.svg" has correct colors (which are different from the original "File:HC-Logo.jpg" from which "File:HC-Logo.svg" took its colors) then of course the latter should be deleted.
Gregors (talk) 06:12, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:07, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
It's hideous and, apart from a big number of stolons, doesn't show much. la la means I love you ¤ messages 18:03, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 08:35, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
"It's hideous and, apart from a big number of stolons, doesn't show much." falls under "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." la la means I love you ¤ messages 07:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep There's no need to reopen a just closed DR for something like this. And can you tone down your signature a little?--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:20, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: Still no valid reason for deletion. Courcelles (talk) 23:35, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/Image:St. Johannes Nepomuk Göllheim Chor (detail) 01.jpg
Not sure copyright has expired 77.184.148.44 07:40, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 08:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Ukraine. This photograph is a derivative work of the sculptor's copyright and must be deleted. Build in 1997. 195.110.6.202 08:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. No sculptural work pictured. Just a simple stone untouched by the sculptor (pretty random shape) with a panel with names (just gray letters on black background, nothing sculptural as well) — NickK (talk) 23:41, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 22:48, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Ukraine. This photograph is a derivative work of the sculptor's copyright and must be deleted. 195.110.6.202 08:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Could be rather old. First find out who the sculptor was, then nominate for deletion. -- Herby (Vienna) (talk) 17:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Bad luck. Ametkhan was awarded his secong Gold Star on July 26, 1945 (the citation is reproduced on the monument, although the date in the last line is barely readable). This makes further research unnecessary. It can't be PD-70 if it's ≥1945. NVO (talk) 04:33, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Ukraine. This photograph is a derivative work of the sculptor's copyright en:Alexey Dushkin and must be deleted. 178.93.1.241 19:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: all possible FOP issues are DM Jcb (talk) 01:12, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Ukraine. This photograph is a derivative work of the sculptor's copyright and must be deleted. 195.110.6.202 08:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. No law changes since previous nomination, no new arguments. No reason for deletion.--Anatoliy (talk) 23:46, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- what is DM?--Rumlin (talk) 04:41, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- See COM:DM - Jcb (talk) 19:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
As an author of the photo I request to delete it because it violates Ukrainian law. This is photo of Crimean railway station. There is no freedom of panorama of any sort in Ukraine. Andrey Legayev (talk) 13:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Also mentioned at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Simferopol Railway Station, merge DRs? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:24, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no changes since last DR. Pretty utilitarian with possible copyrighted elements covered by DM. --rubin16 (talk) 09:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
No FOP in Ukraine TentingZones1 (talk) 13:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Question Did you read any of the previous discussion about this photo at File talk:Simferopol - train station - Feb 2011.jpg? Why should it be deleted now when it wasn't then? Please address the keep rationale by User:rubin16: "no changes since last DR. Pretty utilitarian with possible copyrighted elements covered by DM." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:13, 5 July 2022 (UTC)- and this argument would have been better declared by a non-Russian user, but COM:FOP Crimea applies here, too rubin16 (talk) 10:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- @TentingZones1: Irrespective of originality status, the present consensus at WikiCommons is that Crimea is now using Russian laws. This means, Russian copyright law and the more liberal (yes, more liberal) Russian freedom of panorama that grants commercial uses to architecture only, unlike the Ukrainian copyright law that does not grant freedom of panorama for anything other than free use of public works and art by mainstream media only (reporting purposes). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:09, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination TentingZones1 (talk) 13:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
There is no FOP in Ukraine. This photograph is a derivative work of the sculptor's copyright and must be deleted. 195.110.6.202 08:26, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Doubt own work of this only contribution of this user. No meta data and low resolution for this type of image Wouter (talk) 09:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Question own work. Only contribution of user. CD cover Wouter (talk) 09:45, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
I uploaded this file from ku.Wikipedia. The photographer had already uploaded it himself, so this file is duplicated. So please deleate. Thank you! MikaelF (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:12, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Unlikely own work. No permission to reuse. Out of scope? 217.234.65.155 12:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo and in use Jcb (talk) 08:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Files by en:User:Kjrajesh
[edit]- File:Nemmara.jpg 75×121
- File:Kanai.jpg 100×95
- File:Kunnathurmuthappan.jpg 159×209
- File:Edakka.jpg 176×131
- File:Elephant-Trunks.png 194×89
- File:Kalari-Urumi.jpg 200×244
- File:Aana1.jpg 230×170
- File:Classes-at-kalamandalam.jpg 239×148
- File:MuthapanTemple_kannur_kerala_india.jpg 250×159
- File:Idakka-1_crop.jpg 267×387
- File:Payyambalambeach.jpg 275×172
- File:Som-ind.png 280×336
- File:Snake-eating-chick.jpg 283×470
- File:Mutthapan1.jpg 285×291
- File:Snakepark1_kannur_kerala_india.jpg 290×180
- File:Kerala-girl-left.jpg 300×550
- File:Pothundi.jpg 308×200
- File:Kolkali.jpg 350×260
- File:Nelliampathi-Monkey.jpg 375×586
- File:Aana3.jpg 400×268
- File:Thimala1.jpg 402×305
- File:Mutthapan-temple-inside.jpg 426×281
- File:Anakotta1.jpg 480×360
- File:Sari-and-Mundu.png 491×550
- File:Mutappan-as-Vishnu.jpg 498×714
- File:Kerala-mundu.JPG 501×1148
- File:Asian_cobra.jpg 508×487
- File:Three-anna-with-thidambu.jpg 517×414
- File:Snakepark-kannur1.jpg 536×800
- File:Way_towards_Sarvajna_Peetha.jpg 536×800
- File:New-West-Camp-Jebel-Ali-2.JPG 640×480
- File:Aranmullavallamkali.jpg 640×480
- File:Sarpa-Kavu-2.jpg 658×541
- File:Panchavadiam.JPG 716×443
- File:Thrissur_Town.JPG 720×540
- File:Mutappan-as-Shiva.jpg 743×1904
- File:Pancharimelam.jpg 745×558
- File:House_in_Kerala.jpg 770×441
- File:Aaanayoottu.jpg 788×600
- File:Sanke-park-kannur-2.jpg 800×594
- File:Sanke-park-kannur-1.jpg 800×600
- File:Kudajadri1.jpg 800×536
- File:Nelliyampathi-Mountains.jpg 800×536
- File:Nelliampathy-mountains.jpg 800×536
- File:Nelliyampathy-tea-garden.jpg 800×536
- File:Nelliampathi-lake1.jpg 800×536
- File:Nemmara-paddy-fields.jpg 800×536
- File:Rajarajeshwara-Temple-Wall.jpg 800×536
- File:Abra_Bur_Dubai.jpg 800×600
- File:Mountain002-Nelli.jpg 800×600
- File:KaikatiTeaPlantation.jpg 800×600
- File:Pothundidam-Nelli.jpg 800×600
- File:Vatakumnathan_Elephant_cropped.jpg 800×534
- File:Village-nemmara.jpg 800×600
- File:Koodalmanikyam1.jpg 800×531
- File:Herd_of_cows_over_Munnar_hills.jpg 800×533
- File:Hills_around_Munnar.jpg 800×505
- File:Mattupatti_Dam_reservoir,_Munnar.jpg 800×486
- File:Kannur-snakepark2.jpg 800×536
- File:Vazhachal-falls1.jpg 800×536
- File:Vazhachal-falls.jpg 800×536
- File:Vazhachal1.jpg 800×536
- File:Athirapally-waterfalls.jpg 800×536
- File:Bhagvati_thirra_kerala.JPG 969×738
- File:Poonkunnam_Temple_-_1.jpg 1024×768
- File:Poonkunnam_Temple_Gate_-_1.jpg 1024×768
- File:Man_waiting_for_passengers.jpg 1024×685
- File:Chamundi_dance.JPG 1101×790
- File:Re-exposure_of_elephant_-_lahugala_park1.jpg 1266×854
- File:Fort_Mappila_1.JPG 1273×823
- File:Nemmara-fence.JPG 1280×960
- File:Nemmara-rice-straw.JPG 1280×960
- File:Toddy_2.jpg 1309×1092
- File:Vatakumnadhan.jpg 1448×870
- File:Vadakumnathan_Temple_Gate.jpg 1500×952
- File:Thiruvambadi_Sri-Krishna_Temple.jpg 1600×1200
- File:Paramekkavu_Temple.JPG 1600×1200
- File:Nemmara03.jpg 1600×1200
- File:Thrippunithura-Elephant4_crop.jpg 1728×2624
- File:Thrippunithura-Elephant6_crop.jpg 1908×2792
- File:Nelli-stream5.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Nelliampathy-Stream.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Kokarni1.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Nelli-stream1.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Nelli-stream2.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Pothundidam07.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Pothundidam2.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Pothundidam02.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Pothundidam05.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Pothundidam01.jpg 2048×1536
- File:PothundiDam-India01.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Paddy-Nemmara1.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Paddy-Nemmara.jpg 2048×1536
- File:WaytoNelliampathi.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Pothundidam06.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Pooram_Elephant_1.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Nilavilakku.jpg 2048×1536
- File:Forest-Nelli1.jpg 2080×1368
- File:Nelli-forest.jpg 2080×1368
- File:Nelli-stream3.jpg 2080×1368
- File:Nelli-stream4.jpg 2080×1368
- File:Nelliampathi6.jpg 2080×1368
- File:Stream-in-Nelliampathi.jpg 2080×1368
- File:Kolthari.JPG 2204×1836
- File:Elephant_Saluting.jpg 2304×1728
- File:Pooram_Elephant_4.jpg 2304×1728
- File:Asian-African-Elephant.png 2605×1192
- File:Pazhuval_Kanal_1.jpg 2684×1636
- File:Moppila-Bay-28.jpg 2768×2026
- File:Entrance_of_Guruvayur.JPG 2816×1872
- File:Guruvayur-shops.JPG 2816×1872
- File:Guruvayur-gate1.JPG 2816×1872
- File:Guruvayur-gate.jpg 2816×1872
- File:Poonkunnam_Shiva_Temple_2.JPG 2816×2112
- File:Poonkunnam_Shiva_Temple_1.JPG 2816×2112
- File:Vadakumnathan-temple-gate-4.jpg 2888×1996
- File:Vadukumnathan.jpg 2934×1867
- File:Vadakumnathan-1.jpg 2964×1900
- File:Vadakumnathan-temple-gate-1.jpg 3018×2269
- File:Kannur-fort-2.JPG 3026×2105
- File:Vadakumnathan-temple-gate-3.jpg 3029×2191
- File:Vadakumnathan-temple-gate-2.jpg 3029×2195
- File:Kannur-Fort-22.jpg 3032×2186
- File:Kannur-Fort-18.jpg 3056×2224
- File:Arabian-sea-Kannur-Fort-1.JPG 3072×2085
- File:African-Asian-Elephants.png 4366×2792
This user: en:User:Kjrajesh has collected the from the web. There are several different exif infos:
- SONY DSC-W35 (this could actually be the uploaders own camera)
- CEC DC-2320 December 2002
- CASIO COMPUTER CO.,LTD. QV-R4 February 2003
- Canon PowerShot A400 December 2005
- NIKON E3200 February 2006
- Canon PowerShot A95 March 2006
- SONY DSC-S40 May 2006
- SONY DSC-H9 August 2007
- Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL December 2007 (this could also be the uploaders own camera)
- Canon DIGITAL IXUS 750 June 2008
- SONY DSC-W220 October 2037 <- funny date in exif
80% have no exif. Lots of images are ultra low resolution (eg: File:Classes-at-kalamandalam.jpg;File:Kanai.jpg) which look as if they come directly from a webpage.
Problem ist, that the images have been on en:wp and commons for ages and are used widely. I also havn't tagged the images jet as there are about 130 and I want to ask a bot operator to assist here.
User seems to be still active so I hope to get imput from him. --Amada44 talk to me 16:32, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 19:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder. This poster includes a Time-Warner logo; Time-Warner probably holds the copyright. —Bkell (talk) 15:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Check the website http://www.gravymedia.com/ for history or my profile on IMDB http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4125716/ We created these visuals in my house. My company designed the One eskimO visuals. I have a contract to say I can use them as we created them. Whoever is trying to prevent us from using them please contact us via the gravymedia website above.
Time Warner licensed the brand and invested in the production of the series based on 2 independent pilot we produced. That license has expired now.
- GravyMedia.com says, "Copyright 2011 gravymedia Ltd". There is no indication there that the copyright holder has agreed to license their copyrighted material under a Creative Commons license or the GFDL. —Bkell (talk) 11:45, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- GravyMedia representative agrees in ticket 2011090910020915. – Adrignola talk 20:17, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. No reason to doubt OTRS. - Jmabel ! talk 17:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep OTRS confirmed and in use on wikipedia. Warfieldian (talk) 00:40, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS valid, and in use Courcelles (talk) 07:33, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Taken from a Web page. Unlikely that the uploader is the copyright holder. —Bkell (talk) 15:19, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Check the website http://www.gravymedia.com/ for history or my profile on IMDB http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4125716/ We created these visuals in my house. My company designed the One eskimO visuals. I have a contract to say I can use them as we created them. Whoever is trying to prevent us from using them please contact us via the gravymedia website above.
- GravyMedia.com says, "Copyright 2011 gravymedia Ltd". There is no indication there that the copyright holder has agreed to license their copyrighted material under a Creative Commons license or the GFDL. —Bkell (talk) 11:44, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
GravyMedia.com says This image is low resolution, I am using this link for Wikipedia. It is providing information to the user and directing traffic to gravymedia.com (my website) and the gravy media facebook page. Both these page links provide more information to One eskimO. I am providing a good service here. If you want to discuss this further then I suggest you contact me nathan@gravymedia.com I am happy to provide more information. Please stop trying to delete this image, muchas gracias.
I have now changed the image
- Please sign your comments using --~~~~.
- You need to send us a written permission from a official gravymedia email account. --Túrelio (talk) 19:13, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- I have now sent you an email from the gravymedia email account. --~~~~
- Thanks. But for the signature you shouldn't use the invisible code, but the visible string. --Túrelio (talk) 20:12, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
GravyMedia representative agrees to CC-BY-SA-3.0 in ticket 2011090910020915. – Adrignola talk 20:17, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS confirmed Túrelio (talk) 20:42, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Clearly violates {{No advertising}} as it contains promotional links and encourages people to 'Like' gravy media on FB. Cropped version File:Oegravy.jpg that doesn't contain the promotional links already exists. Warfieldian (talk) 16:19, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
I am only providing more information to people who want to know more about One eskimO and the creators (us). We are not selling anything, just offering an information service --Erasmus sums are (talk) 21:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. By suggesting that people visit your Web site and "like" your company on Facebook, you are promoting your company and your product. That is not what Wikimedia Commons is for. See the list of examples of "files that are not realistically useful for an educational purpose" at Commons:Project scope#Examples, which includes "Advertising or self-promotion." —Bkell (talk) 22:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment A new version has been uploaded over the previous one which was nominated for deletion -- still a blatant promotional image. Warfieldian (talk) 13:17, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. In use therefore in scope. --Trycatch (talk) 12:47, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Previously found in scope due to being in use on en.wiki. I have removed it from the page on en.wiki because it violates promotional links at wikipedia. Clearly violates {{No advertising}} on Commons as it contains promotional links and encourages people to 'Like' gravy media on FB. There is an adequate previous cropped version of this image File:Oegravy.jpg that doesn't contain the promotional links and is adequate for illustration on the wikipedia page. Warfieldian (talk) 00:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. I think we can safely dispose of this image. Missvain (talk) 01:46, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Okay, I've cropped the advertising part. Giving that it's a logo/mascot of a notable group -- w:One Eskimo, I suppose now it can be kept. Trycatch (talk) 12:03, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept - Jcb (talk) 15:11, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
this pic is a shadow of (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kenyatta_International_Conference_Center_Towers.jpg) . RohG ??· 15:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Yes both are the same. This one I uploaded to Commons, the other one someone else uploaded from my flichr galary, so please keep one of them and delete the other (though personally I would prefer to delete the one someone else uploaded, I don't really see the logic why the one I personally uploaded should be deleted).--Wing (talk) 19:42, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept: and deleted the duplicate Jcb (talk) 08:16, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
The architects, Gustave and Auguste Perret are dead in 1952 and 1954. Their buildings are protected by copyright because there isn't FoP in France. Sebleouf (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:21, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
The architects, Gustave and Auguste Perret are dead in 1952 and 1954. Their buildings are protected by copyright because there isn't FoP in France. Sebleouf (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:21, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
and File:Martin Kašík.pdf. Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photoalbum. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:22, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Also exist on MySpace band page. May be promo photo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:22, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. May be in public domain, but relevant info must be supplied. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:22, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument aux Morts de Tourcoing (détails côté droit du monument).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument aux Morts de Tourcoing (détails côté gauche du monument).jpg
File:Monument_aux_Morts_de_Tourcoing_(2).jpg, File:Monument aux Morts de Tourcoing (détails côté droit du monument).jpg, File:Monument aux Morts de Tourcoing (détails côté gauche du monument).jpg
[edit]The architect, Edouard Monestès is dead in 1944. This building is protected by copyright because there isn't FoP in France. Sebleouf (talk) 16:34, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete not in the DP until 2015. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 18:17, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Self made. No historical or other meaning or use. Out of scope. P199 (talk) 17:07, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Actually, traditionally Commons has been quite tolerant of "Special or fictional flags" (we have hundreds of them), unless they're maliciously hoaxing or hatemongering. Furthermore, there has also been tolerance (within certain limits) towards personal-use images on Wikipedia user pages, such as the use of File:FlagofGod.png in en:User:Wolfdog406/UBX/God. This userbox could of course be changed to use the SVG instead of the PNG (though it hasn't been done yet)... If thought to be necessary, either Template:Fictitious flag or Template:Userpageimage could be added, but I don't see a real need for deleting the image. -- AnonMoos (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
The present PNG userimage seemed better represented by a vector graphic, and it was thought to replace the PNG in the several userboxes which are multiple used.- It has been an interesting effort to arrange the overlay of the different colors to create an extremely simple SVG file. Mainly it should serve as an essential example for manually coded simple SVG.
I don't care But if the file is anyway really harmful to the Commons I won't oppose its deletion. -- sarang
사랑 06:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_insignia.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg,_File:Monument_aux_Morts_de_Tourcoing_(détails_côté_droit_du_monument).jpg,_File:Monument_aux_Morts_de_Tourcoing_(détails_côté_gauche_du_monument).jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Screenshot_google_pseudo.png&diff=59071497&oldid=59051522){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Screenshot_google_pseudo_forca.png&diff=59071408&oldid=59051535){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_insignia.svg){kind=link}
_insignia.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_insignia.svg){kind=link}
_insignia.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg,_File:Monument_aux_Morts_de_Tourcoi){kind=link}
.jpg,_File:Monument_aux_Morts_de_Tourcoi){kind=link}
Kept. Jcb (talk) 08:26, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
PNG files by User:Cmr97
[edit]- File:Iglésia del carme.png
- File:Casa de ferrer.png
- File:Safareig Public de la Portalera.png
- File:Pont romanic.png
- File:Torre de Castellterçol.png
- File:Castell de canoves.png
- File:Torre de Marata.png
- File:Molí de l'esclop.png
- File:Plaça de la font del lleó.png
- File:Font del lleó.png
- File:Castell de cruïlles.png
- File:Santuari vell de Meritxell.png
All these photos were almost certainly copied from various web pages. I have already found sources for a few files uploaded by this user (they were deleted earlier). It takes some time however. I would like to proceed with them all at once. Some files are reworked, e.g. here is source for this file. The image on Commons is cropped and with one additional cloud drawn on the sky. It makes difficult for google to find image source in some cases. -- Jakubhal 18:35, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Reworking files this way is bad faith behaviour. One more sample of copyvio: File:Font del lleó.png is from fotocommunity.es. I don't trust any of his uploads. --V.Riullop (talk) 19:19, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP applies here, and a patern has been shown Courcelles (talk) 03:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
All files contributed by the uploader are copyrighted by someone other than the uploader. All files on English Wikipedia have been deleted (see w:en:User talk:Hlecroy), but a couple such as this one were transferred to Commons. This one can be found on many offical websites of Rock Hill South Carolina (for example, http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rock-Hill-South-Carolina/107588489271016) PCock (talk) 18:50, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:26, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
All files contributed by the uploader of this image have been copyrighted by someone other than the uploader. All files on English Wikipedia have been deleted (see w:en:User talk:Hlecroy), but a couple such as this one were transferred to Commons. There is no reason to believe that this one isn't a copyright violation as well. PCock (talk) 18:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:26, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
I'm sorry but there is NO copyright violations This full free content, generated by myself
Files uploaded by Benoithamet
[edit]Out of project scope as plain text, Commons:Project scope#Excluded educational content. Also most of this is not educational but simply spam for some "consultant". And it contains a whole lot of copyright violations: Unfree microsoft content, unfree stock photography, unfree text without citation, and so on.
- File:UAG – VPN access configuration.pdf
- File:UAG - SharePoint – Remote access using SharePoint Designer.pdf
- File:Exchange 2010 - Outlook 2010 – Mailbox name show the email address.pdf
- File:ForeFront UAG - SharePoint – Allow remote blog posting AFTER UAG SP1.pdf
- File:SharePoint – Consume Service Application from other farm.pdf
- File:SharePoint – Allow RSS feed through UAG.pdf
- File:Exchange – Publish POP-IMAP settings on OWA.pdf
- File:SharePoint 2010 – User profile - event id 1004 and 1001.pdf
- File:SharePoint - UAG – Keep SharePoint content available offline on your Windows Mobile phone.pdf
- File:UAG – Provide remote desktop access without Remote Desktop Gateway.pdf
- File:SharePoint 2010 – Visio Graphics.pdf
- File:TMG – FTP over HTTP not allowed and not available at the Enterprise level.pdf
- File:SharePoint 2010 – Anonymous access, extended web application and search.pdf
- File:SharePoint – Office – Broadcast a PowerPoint presentation.pdf
- File:SharePoint 2010 – Auto configure the Outlook Web Access webparts.pdf
- File:SharePoint 2010 – Backup your synchronization profile connection.pdf
- File:SharePoint 2010 – User profile service still in ‘starting’ mode – follow up.pdf
- File:Exchange - ForeFront UAG – Publishing Exchange 2010 with UAG.pdf
- File:SharePoint - Visio – Create organizational chart based on a SharePoint list.pdf
- File:Windows Phone – Cleaning the restore point.pdf
- File:Office 365 – How to synchronize Office 365 when you have multiple AD Forest.pdf
- File:Office 365 – Use Office 365 for email hosting only.pdf
- File:Office 365 – Manage ForeFront Online Protection for Exchange from your ForeFront Protection for Exchange console.pdf
- File:Office 365 – Configure your Outlook account.pdf
- File:Office 365 – Assign an alias to a user.pdf
- File:Office 365 – Receive your mails from other addresses on Exchange Online.pdf
- File:Office 365 – Invite external people to access to your SharePoint site.pdf
- File:Office 365 – Enable multilingual interface on SharePoint sites.pdf
- File:Office 365 – Add your Office 365 forest on your Exchange Management Console.pdf
- File:Office 365 – Manage your SharePoint site collection (and others settings).pdf
- File:Office 365 – Install and configure Directory Synchronization (DirSync).pdf
- File:Exchange - Windows Phone – OAB downloads, synchronization failure and Windows Phone update failed to install.pdf
- File:Exchange 2010 – Rollup Update 3v3 installation issues.pdf
- File:UAG – Be careful with the IE Protected Mode.pdf
- File:SharePoint – No Office documents in search result – solved.pdf
- File:SharePoint – Unable to resolve audience.pdf
- File:SharePoint – The importance of the AAM.pdf
- File:SharePoint - Fast – Manage keywords for Best bet.pdf
- File:Office 365 – Create distribution list.pdf
- File:ForeFront UAG – UAG Endpoint components may block services to start.pdf
- File:TN013 - Benoit HAMET (AVANADE) - Pourquoi et comment déployer Windows XP et Office 2003.pdf
- File:TechDays 2011 - PAR 219 - Préparation à la migration Lotus Notes vers SharePoint.pdf
- File:TechDays 2010 - SHG303 - Administration scenarios v1.0.pdf
- File:TechDays 2010 - SHG303 - Administration SharePoint 2010 v1.0.pdf
- File:TechDays 2010 - SET206 - ForeFront pour la protection des portails d'entreprise v 1.0.pdf
- File:Sécurité - Mise en oeuvre de la sécurité de votre périmètre et de votre réseau.pdf
- File:TechDays 2009 - SEC215 - Publier et securiser les acces aux environnements d entreprise MOSS.pdf
- File:TechDays 2009 - COL222 - Introduction au troubleshooting de MOSS 2007.pdf
- File:Sécuriser les serveurs Web (IIS5 et IIS6).pdf
- File:Nouveautés en matière de sécurité du Service Pack 2 de Windows XP.pdf
- File:2010-06-07 - Club MOSS - Nouveautés administration SharePoint 2010.pdf
- File:2010-03-15 - Club MOSS - Publication SharePoint.pdf
- File:2010-06-01 - Quest IT Performance 2010 - Gouvernance SharePoint v1.0.pdf
- File:2009-11-27 - Club MOSS - Préparer la migration vers SharePoint 2010.pdf
- File:Sensibilisation (présentation).pdf
- File:Sensibilisation.pdf
- File:Formation CCI.pdf
- File:Cahier des charges.pdf
- File:Rapport de stage.pdf
- File:Powertoys.pdf
- File:MS Network Security Hotfix Checker et MS Baseline Security.pdf
- File:Gestionnaire de taches.pdf
- File:Zdnet mbsa.pdf
- File:Zdnet windows 2003 - nouveautés sécurité.pdf
- File:Benoit HAMET - Windows Installer ou l installation en un clic de souris.pdf
- File:Windows server 2003 - solutions de clustering.pdf
Martin H. (talk) 20:57, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. --P199 (talk) 22:38, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Courcelles (talk) 03:43, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
I found the identical image on this source http://wordpress.photoarts.com.br/page/61/ and there is no evidence it is freely licence nor was ever on Flickr Ww2censor (talk) 21:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:29, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Those labels were applied by APMNIR (www.apmnir.ro) in 2010 and are most likely copyrighted by them - even if information is not copyrightable, the layout is unique enough to be protected Strainu (talk) 21:24, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- I originally proposed this for speedy deletion, but Jcb considered it to simple to be eligible for copyright protection. I believe that both the text and the whole layout are original enough to be protected.--Strainu (talk) 21:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - plain information - that unique, copyrightable layout doesn't appear in the version of the image I see from here - Jcb (talk) 22:05, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Jcb (talk) 08:29, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Promotional picture, available at web since 2008. Uploaded at Commons in 2009. Giro720 (talk) 22:20, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:29, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
I doubt that mashleymorgan is the photographer of this Russian-built aircraft in flight. Please look at the EXIF-data: a person called "Pavel Novikov" is named as the author of this image. I assume this image comes from the official site of the Russian Aircraft Corporation (former MiG). High Contrast (talk) 23:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
I doubt that mashleymorgan is the photographer of this Russian-built aircraft in flight. Please look at the EXIF-data: a person called "Pavel Novikov" is named as the author of this image. I assume this image comes from the official site of the Russian Aircraft Corporation (former MiG). High Contrast (talk) 23:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jcb (talk) 08:30, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
