User talk:Oranjblud

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Oranjblud!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 04:07, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

British Rail Class 67 number 67029

[edit]

Hi. First off, to the best of my knowledge, this is the only modern UK loco/MU to have its own category. Secondly, please don't pull such images out of British Rail Class 67s in English, Welsh and Scottish Railway corporate livery - liveries change, especially given EWS doesn't exist anymore it's silly to put it in there and assume that the train will be in that livery forever. In fact, this week's RAIL has a photo of it repainted into DB livery, so... -mattbuck (Talk) 22:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, is there any reason why this image is so light? – JBarta (talk) 23:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Same as the source : http://www.openstreetmap.org/ ...Oranjblud (talk) 00:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, makes sense. It's quite light (almost illegible IMO) and I was going to darken/brighten it, but figured I'd ask first. Nevermind, carry on. – JBarta (talk) 00:27, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wood versus Forest

[edit]

Why do you keep moving Category:Skipton Wood (amongst others) to Category:Forests in North Yorkshire? It is not a forest, it is a wood. I have reverted your change again. --JD554 (talk) 13:50, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relative size (woods are smaller than forests) and common sense. Skipton Wood most certainly isn't a forest. The en wiki article sums it up nicely: "Woodland is used in British woodland management to mean any smaller area covered in trees, however dense. (Forest is usually used in the British Isles only for more extensive wooded areas, again, regardless of density – and also including Royal forests, which may not be wooded at all). The term Ancient Woodland is used in British nature conservation to refer to any wooded land that has existed for a very long period (equivalent to the American term old growth forest)." --JD554 (talk) 14:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Oranjblud. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Category discussion warning

Category:Monuments_and_Memorials_in_Middlesbrough has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


PanchoS (talk) 13:41, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JCP (a.k.a. John Carlo Pagcaliwagan) 22:39, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:SZ_Class_642 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


2A00:EE2:500:7500:E1DC:1FD1:D0BB:F73A 15:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:SZ_Class_643 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


2A00:EE2:500:7500:E1DC:1FD1:D0BB:F73A 15:55, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:SZ_Class_732 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


2A00:EE2:500:7500:E1DC:1FD1:D0BB:F73A 16:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

editToken

[edit]

Hello Oranjblud. I just wanted to let you know that editToken has been removed from MediaWiki, and you still use it in one or more of your userspace scripts. If you want your user script(s) to work properly, please replace editToken with csrfToken in source code of the scripts. You'll need to change the following script(s):

Regards, Ahmadtalk 21:42, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]