Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groep fan Auwerk (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Modussiccandi (talk) 12:11, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Groep fan Auwerk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Looks a bit like selfpromo. Recreation of an earlier removed article. The Banner talk 11:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I found one extensive source on the "free Frisian" movement that talks about this group: "The Frisians as an Indigenous Minority Group within a Unified Europe", but I didn't find other sources. It is possible that this can replace the non-independent sources in the article, which might bring it up to "barely keep". Also, I didnt find the Leeuwarder Courant article that is poorly cited in the article. Finding that could be helpful. Lamona (talk) 19:15, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:35, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I usually agree with the nominator but this group received so much coverage in the Leeuwarder Courant [1] that I cannot agree with this one. Agree that this article needs cleaning up. gidonb (talk) 16:56, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- With all due respect, but most of these articles are about their actions (commemorations, Frisian language placename signs, Frisian flags etc.) and not about the group itself. The Banner talk 17:05, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the development and promotion of shared histories, symbols, signage, and proposals for political divisions of space core business for a nonviolent separatist group? gidonb (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. According to another editor: individual protests not relevant. The Banner talk 23:21, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos for this cleanup. Precisely what I suggest. I agree that this list of all their campaigns was not helpful. The more important ones are mentioned in the history and were justifiably not removed, so this is redundant. Furthermore, the dates these reports went out are not historical dates. In addition to this cleanup, the flag business needs clarification and the list of possible Frisian territories, just rehashes stuff elsewhere. Can be deleted as well. Low German has gotten this right. gidonb (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.