Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsakana Nkandih (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Two relists didn't attract any further participation, so another one seems pointless. Michig (talk) 10:46, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tsakana Nkandih (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Only know from WP:ONEEVENT The Banner talk 10:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, really only one event here, since both were so close together, and one is (as I understand) basically a qualifier for the other. Whilst Namibia is lacking coverage, I don't think that this is what it needs. Mako001 (C)  (T)  14:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, she is known for two events, because the national qualifying pageant and Miss Universe (e.g. Getty) are distinct events, and an online search supports WP:BASIC notability, e.g. 1 (AllAfrica, 2012), 2 (BellaNaija, 2012), 3 (AllAfrica, 2016), and various articles in The Namibian. Per the Wikiproject Beauty Pageants essay on notability, Winners of the national-level pageants which select participants for the Big Four pageants are [...] generally presumed to be notable. Beccaynr (talk) 16:03, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Being Miss Namibia or first place of country beauty pageant, means she meets criterion #3 and maybe #1 of WP:ENT and meets also WP:NBEAUTY. Caphadouk (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:37, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.