Talk:2010s in fashion

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

2010s Low‑importance

	2010s portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Brogan, Jacob (2015-10-20). "Where Now Transforms Into Then". Slate. Archived from the original on 2015-10-20.

Keep it short

As a reminder, could anyone editing this page in the future please keep it as short as possible (list form is best) and paste links to support your facts?

That guy whith the red hair on the bottom of the page was not a scene girl. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.220.143.2 (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1940s fashion

I have been noticing there has been a lot of 1940s inspired fashion, especially with the men. Not as much World War II, but the military inspired fashion is probably World War II influenced, and a "rationed" look is in a bit because of the recession. In the 1940s, men wore bermuda shorts, aloha shirts, and fedora hats, which are very common today. The hairstyles on women look a lot like the late 1940s and the dresses are very 1940s like with the shoulder pads, which was popular in the 1980s as well. A lot of cardigans are being weared as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.251.178.141 (talk) 00:28, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are a few 40s fashions (trenchcoats, womens hairstyles, shoulder pads) but most of the clothing is closer to postwar fashion: the new-look dresses worn by women did not become common until rationing ended. The bermuda shorts, aloha shirts, leather jackets and baseball jackets are 1950s fashions, as are the wool topcoats and cardigans (more "British austerity" than "Grease"). The fedoras are more like the stingy-brim hats worn in the late 50s and early 60s by rude boys and car salesmen. The hairstyles are also closer to the 50s: in the 40s most men wore military haircuts like the buzzcut and flat top while the slicked-back hair was shorter and neater than in the 50s — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.222.126.207 (talk) 16:15, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

60s revival

A lot of young people do wear 60s inspired clothing but it's not a 2010s trend. 60s fashions have been popular in Britain since the mid-2000s (see 2000s in fashion) when indie groups began wearing mod clothing. The 60s clothing of the 2010s (especially the store-bought imitations) is largely a continuation of earlier fashions rather than a new fad. However, the rude boy-inspired stingy-brim hats, side-parted hair, and beatnik-style turtle necks are new. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.5.174.48 (talk) 01:30, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

present or past?

Since this article is about the 2010s and we are currently all living in the 2010s, theoretically it would be fine to write in the present tense. But what about ten years from now? Should we pretend, as writers, that we are actually from somewhere in the future, looking back into the past? That way, the article about the 2010s is consistent in tense as the article from an earlier time (say, 1990s or 2000s). 164.107.188.102 (talk) 20:49, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We're still living in the early 2010s (2009-2012). When we get to the mid-2010s (2013-2016) we'll have to change the "early" section to the past tense and do the same thing again when we reach the late 2010s (2017-2020) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.198.103 (talk) 15:39, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How can early 2010s contain a year from the previous decade?, surely you mean 2010. The one year shift goes the other way, but that is only for ordinal centuries and millennia. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 19:29, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

biased?

Much of this article is written somewhat like an advertisement... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.232.70.19 (talk) 02:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I've also noted some stuff on this article about Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney "influencing fashion" by dressing "conservatively." That is just BS because in a ton of the pictures I've seen Romney in, he's wearing a collared shirt and dress pants without a tie or jacket, and Paul Ryan wears suits without ties, and that is NOT dressing "conservatively" at all, nor is it actually fashionable, and sweater vests were already in fashion (at least in my area) in 2009 and seemed to go out of fashion when Santorum dropped out of the race.99.44.250.152 (talk) 20:01, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Youth fashion in Brazil

I will not explain my point because everything here is nearly ok. I will explain what happened. (View history and see the creation of this section for what I Lguipontes wrote, too much meticulous information, I deleted because it caused visual pollution)

As such, everybody ended up being rival of someone. Just naming: mid-2000s emos in 2003-2007 and indies (mostly former emos) in 2004-2008; and late-2000s scene kids (mostly former indies and emos) in 2007-2010 and coloridos (mostly former emos) in 2009-2011. Now some people are starting to get older, and lefting emo, indie (as it is know in Brazil, I never saw a former indie abandoning 'hipsterism') and scene kid as funny moments of their life history (the coloridos are still mostly sub17s and are unlikely to left love for Restart this soon), but there are still many persons dressing that way in schools and streets, and in São Paulo it certainly did not went out of fashion. That is what I tried to say. Lguipontes (talk) 17:02, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Organization

Let's start this article on the right foot shall we? Right now it's a pretty chaotic mess, but since it's still early in the decade it's not too late to change that. I don't want to see this article looking like the mess that is the 2000s fashion, and the 1990s fashion articles. You guys should take a look at how much the 1980s article has improved in the past couple years. I really hope this article can be like that as well.

The most important thing to do is to identify important subcategories. My first instinct is to separate fashions based on geography, but there doesn't seem to be much information on fashions outside of Western pop culture at the moment. Also I see a lot of crap in this article. People have been listing every odd piece of clothing that has been marketed since the start of the decade. This article is about the styles and fashions that have actually become mainstream. Think about what you would want to see here 50 years from now. It is also important to keep this article in the perspective of what has changed since the 2000s. That means it isn't necessary to talk about what has remained popular since the 2000s. Also can we please refrain from using brand names, but rather describe the styles of clothing associated with the brand names. I can understand if a brand name is especially unique (a case could be made for Ed Hardy for example) but for brands like Nike, Abercrombie, and Polo Ralph Lauren, it has no place and will only mislead readers in the future. The Nike of the future may not be the same style as today's Nike!

This entire article reads like a list. We should split all of these lists into categories of subculture at the least and either link to that subculture's page or describe the origins of the subculture somewhat. This seems to be a really daunting task. I just wanted to create a dialogue on this subject, and also plea for someone more capable than myself to fix up this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.119.249.103 (talk) 05:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The 2000s fashion article was once like the one on 80s fashion, but some genius decided to cut out all the main trends and subculture stuff and reduce the article to a couple of sentences. Subcultures belong in the "youth fashion" section, as few people over 25 dress like that. Perhaps we could use a model like this, where major trends and subcultures are each given a paragraph of their own in the relevant sections:

Intro

Style influences, vintage clothing, continuations with 2000s

Womens fashion trends of the Early 2010s

General trends like the 1980s and 1930s revival
Tops
Bottoms
Accessories

Mid 2010s

General trends
Tops
Bottoms
Accessories

Late 2010s

General trends
Tops
Bottoms
Accessories

Mens fashion trends of the Early 2010s

General trends like Ed Hardy, tweed, Edwardian suits and Indie music
Tops
Bottoms
Accessories

Mid 2010s

General trends
Tops
Bottoms
Accessories

Late 2010s

General trends
Tops
Bottoms
Accessories

Youth fashion

Paragraph explaning the similarities between teenage and adult clothing, influence of music and celebrities on mainstream fashion.
1. Hipsters/Indie (start with the earliest subcultures then add others as they become more common)
2. Scene Kids
3. Hip-hop
4. Preppy
5. etc.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osama57 (talk • contribs) 13:27, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redesign

What do you think of the new look?

-Osama

Not bad! It's a start for sure. Some suggestions I have is to integrate the pictures at the bottom into the article itself, and to remove bullet points and have proper paragraphs. That would bring this article from looking like a "start class" article to something more finished (even though it won't be "finished" for another several years). --76.10.155.251 (talk) 04:07, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of having general trends rather than "tops, bottoms and accessories", as in 2000s in fashion? Example:

Womens fashion

Early 2010s

1. Retro fashion
2. Ed Hardy and Neon colors
3. Sportswear as casual wear (especially leggings and jeggings)
4. Formal wear

Mid-Late 2010s

1. etc...
2. etc....

Mens fashion

Early 2010s

1. Indie Look
2. Edwardian revival
3. Slim-fit suits (this and the one above may be put in a more general section on retro formal attire)
4. etc....

Mid-Late 2010s

1. etc...
2. etc...

Youth Fashion

Hipster
Scene
Preppy
Hip-hop
Steampunk
Latin American

Hairstyles and makeup

Women
Men
Teenagers

I was looking at previous articles recently and that actually seems more congruent with the other decades. Also I wouldn't use the 2000s article as a role model. The articles for the 80s and prior are much higher quality.--99.234.56.214 (talk) 04:31, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Globalize template

This article is labeled as dealing with "fashion," but appears to deal almost exclusively with European and American fashion; therefore I have added the globalize template. Articles dealing with 1909 and before are expressly limited to Western fashion in the intro paragraph, apparently on the basis that fashion was mostly a Western thing during those periods, but articles about "fashion" in recent periods need to be global in scope. Elliotreed (talk) 18:50, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's already globalised. We have the UK, Europe, Australasia and the US (the main trendsetters), but also some of the more obscure Latin American and Asian fashions — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osama57 (talk • contribs) 02:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mid-2010s consensus

In the 2000s in fashion article, the decade is divided into three sections: early (2000-2002), mid (2003-2006) and late (2007-2009). Can we have some consensus on when the "mid 2010s" starts: 2013, 2014, or 2015? And when should it end: 2016, 2017 or 2018? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osama57 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC) Mid 2010s start in 2014. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greaymarshess (talk • contribs) 04:48, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mid 2010s start in 2014. This is something you should have learned in first or second grade.--Greaymarshess (talk) 04:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2013 and a third (about May 1 2013) Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 09:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So that's two people who think the mid-2010s starts at some point in 2013 and one person who thinks it starts in 2014. Not enough people yet for any sort of consensus Osama57 (talk) 00:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus on wikipedia is more concerned with the content of the arguement then numbers. 2014-2015 are the mid 2010s. Heres why

Early '10s: 2010-2013 = 4 years
Mid '10s: 2014-2015 = 2 years
Late '10s: 2016-2019 = 4 years

which all together makes a decade or the 2010s in this case. What is the reasoning for 2013 being the part of mid-2010s? Pro66 (talk) 00:56, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yea sorry ignore my last message its late at night, just reread the first message and understand the reason now. Pro66 (talk) 00:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I personally think the 0-2, 3-6, 7-9 divisions are the most balanced (having 3-4-3 years each, respectively). This also seems to be the way it was handled in the other decades' pages. For example I have never heard of 1996 being considered "late '90s" (though ironically a lot of people choose to divide it as 0-3,4-6,7-9, which is not balanced). I don't think I would support splitting up 2013 (from May) and 2016 (from September) to make even thirds just because I think it could get too confusing and possibly ambiguous. MarkMc1990 (talk) 22:07, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest keeping the divisions for the moment. A lot of these new trends will probably still be popular in 2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osama57 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Edits by Osama57

The user Osama57 has recently made numerous edits to this article based upon his/her own opinions, perceptions, and ideas, challenging other editors to prove him/her wrong with their own citations while failing to provide any of his/her own. I have made repeated attempts to make additions to this article in good faith, providing sources and citations for these additions/edits. The net result thus far has been Osama57 continuing to edit the article to his/her liking, nominally without citation, claiming that it is the impetus of other editors to prove him/her wrong. A cursory glance of user Osama57's talk page demonstrates that he/she has been repeatedly brought to task for numerous unhelpful/inaccurate edits to Wiki. I am bringing this to the attention of other editors working on this page in an effort to help maintain the integrity, accuracy, and stability of the article.66.170.204.148 (talk) 17:52, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In reverting edits recently made by Osama57, I am correcting the following, with citation:

Re-establishing/sourcing hipster fashion as a general American fashion trend (as opposed to a phenomenon isolated to late teens/early 20-somethings, as Osama57 has repeatedly insisted, without citation)
Re-establishing/sourcing vintage glasses as a unisex fashion trend (as opposed to Osama57's assertion that this is isolated to women's fashion

I am asking for consensus on the placement of facial hair. While I have provided sources for the phenomenon of the "hipster beard" and "ironic mustache," these have begun to bleed out into mainstream fashion, as my sources also indicate. As such, does it belong in the hipster section, or should it remain in a more general section, with citation linking it to its origins in the hipster culture?66.170.204.148 (talk) 17:57, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alaykum-As-Salaam, anonymous one.

Since when was America the centre of the world? My own edits of this page have been from a global perspective, taking into account not only the US, but Europe, Australasia and China. I take great offence at your slanderous allegations of bias because, where possible, I have always added links containing a photograph, video or news article to previous edits of this page.

In the UK, the hipster subculture evolved from the indie scene of the mid 2000s. Ten years ago, we wore vintage clothing not to be "ironic" like a poser, but as a protest against Chinese-made designer-brand sweatshop goods. The keffiyeh, too, was a form of protest in support of the Palestinians. Before making any future edits, do some research and find out what indie or "hipster" really is: not a bunch of Topman models or art students ironically dressing up as nerds or construction workers (as all the American websites claim), but a British countercultural youth movement based on individuality nad independence.

I agree that some elements of hipster fashion have indeed become mainstream in the early 2010s. As such, they should have paragraphs of their own rather than be lost in a general overview of the subculture. See my most recent edit which you, in your great wisdom, decided to revert. I put vintage glasses in the early 2010s section: these are unisex, but (at least in the UK) are more likely to be worn by young women. The so-called "hipster facial hair" belong in Mens Hairstyles, because logic dictates that few teenagers are able to grow full beards.

You have attacked my edits as biased, but your own are rather vague and leave readers like myself confused. For example, you don't explain how the glasses of 2013 differ from those of 2010, or 2007. Do most people still wear horn-rims in the US (similar in appearance to Wayfarers with clear lenses), or have they moved on to other 1950s styles? If so, which ones? (browline, cat-eye, rimless, teashade, etc) If you work with me instead of unconstructively reverting everything, our edits will provide a much more detailed overview of both European and American fashion.

Ila-liqaa'.

-Osama. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osama57 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You claim that your edits come from a "global" perspective, yet you then go on to speak of hipsters contextualized as a British phenomenon. You also claim that other users find my edits "vague," yet you have been the only one to question them, and ask for information beyond the scope of my sources. The article I quoted states that eyeglass aesthetics changed between Wayfarer knockoffs and 60s frames; it does not elaborate. If I were to provide my own opinions or elaborations on this, they would qualify as OR. Many of your own citations are simply pictures of individual celebrities or figures, with claims that these represent a larger aspect of fashion; at the same time, many of these celebrities or public figures are known solely in the UK, and, again, therefore speak to only a UK perspective. You also continue to insist that hipsters are isolated to teens and early twenty-somethings (your argument itself being a negative proof fallacy), even after I provided not one but three individual sources stating otherwise.

I also do not appreciate your snide edits to my user talk page.66.170.204.148 (talk) 23:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And... if it pleases you to put here: In the 1950s-60s, the Wayfarer shape was unique to sunglasses. Believe it or not, the shape of the frames were actually patented upon their invention, and for the next several decades, remained as sunglass frames. People wore horn rimmed glasses, but they were not shaped like Ray-Ban Wayfarers, simply because the frame had been designed explicitly for sunglasses. The idea of putting clear lenses into them didn't arise until long after the era of horn rims as a mainstream phenomenon had ended.66.170.204.148 (talk) 23:21, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, anonymous one, it's natural that hipsters were originally a British phenomenon because the majority of indie-pop bands originated in the UK during the 1990s and 2000s. European countries, especially England, France and Italy, have always been at the centre of new trends, often years before they reach the US. On the plus side, at least we now know what "hipster glasses" actually are.

One important point: not everyone who wears vintage clothing is a hipster, even if they do listen to indie-pop. A lot of people in the UK (including adults over 25) wore 1960s-inspired clothes during the late 2000s because it was fashionable, and widely available in the shops. Can you prove that a significant number of self-proclaimed hipsters aren't teenagers or young adults? If so, how many are we talking about: a handful of individuals raiding their younger sibling's wardrobe, or a larger number of older people actively identifying with the scene?

In the section below entitled Hipsters, I want you, and other users, to list the most popular clothing in your particular country. Even among members of the same subculture there is probably regional (and class-based) variation. In the UK during the early 2010s, for example, many Northern indie kids continued to wear the mod-inspired clothing of the mid-2000s, while Southern hipsters drew more upon 1980s fashions.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Osama57 (talk • contribs) 03:28, 9 April 2013‎

Still seeing some problems with edits from this user on this article, such as combining three unrelated stories (one man wears long hair out the back of a baseball cap, several men wear "man buns", one man wears a small ponytail) to leap to the conclusion that "small ponytails" are a 2014 fashion trend. Personal opinion is always a good starting point, but if you can't find a good enough source to support your idea, don't use a bad one - either say what the bad source says instead, leave it clearly unsourced for other editors to check, or leave it and try again later when the media might have caught up. --McGeddon (talk) 09:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hipsters

To clarify things for the anonymous one, here in the UK, the most popular hipster clothings (as of 2013) include:

Tweed jackets (guys)
Doc Martens or dress boots (unisex)
Skinny jeans (unisex)
Black leather jackets (unisex)
Beanie hats (guys then eventually unisex)
Flat caps ( usually guys)
Fedoras (guys)
Desert boots (unisex)
Aztec or Navajo print hoodies (unisex)
Checked shirts (especially so-called Western shirts)
Paisley or geometric print shirts (unisex)
Waistcoats (guys)
Nerd glasses (unisex)
Shawl collar cardigans (unisex)
Cable knit and fair isle sweaters (more common on guys)
Polka dot, paisley and stripes (girls)
Keffiyehs (unisex)
A lot of 1940s and 1950s style clothing, especially womens dresses.
1970s and 1990s inspired earth tones rather than 1980s style bright colors (especially on guys)
For guys, "Hitler Youth" haircuts (long on top, shaved on the back and sides) have largely replaced the longer hair of the late 2000s.

In the united states:

Loose-fitting, unconstructed cotton blazers
Baggy vests
V-neck t-shirts
Stocking caps
Narrow ties (especially plaid)
Bow ties
Plaid shirts, though not necessarily "Western" shirts
Flannel shirts
Skinny jeans
Flat caps/newsboy caps
Trilbys
Oversized cardigans (not necessarily shawl collar; this is largely on female hipsters)
Oversized berets (for women)
"Natural" haircuts - hair that has been allowed to grow to a certain point and is then simply trimmed down, without any actual styling

Comparing to your list, these items are definitely unique to UK hipsters:

Desert boots
Aztec or Navajo print hoodies
Paisley or geometric print shirts
Polka dot and stripes
Keffiyehs
"Hitler Youth" haircuts

66.170.204.148 (talk) 02:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. I assume all the other clothings you listed are unisex. -Osama

Steves Peeps

This is the second time in a week that someone's mentioned American fashion designer Steves Peeps. Who exactly is he, how widespread are his designs, and are there any reliable websites we can cite? Wikias don't really count.[1]

The person doesn't appear notable enough to be included in this article in the way he has been, and the repeated edits that include Mr Peeps seem to have characteristics of those by a fangroup. -- Half past formerly SUFCboy 20:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retro eyeglasses

I've changed the section header "Vintage Eyeglasses" to "Retro eyeglasses." "Vintage" refers to an old item; and while there are several people who wear vintage eyeglasses, the trend itself is of wearing vintage-inspired glasses, not the original article.66.170.204.148 (talk) 22:57, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Retro is probably a better description than vintage-style.

Fauxhawk

It was always popular among poor people. I mean the people of the favelas, with weird wannabe-foreign names and that like funk carioca, people that if you act alike you are mocked on (at least until very recently) as Brazil shuns poverty as animalesque, in the United States there are millions of non-poor white guys celebrating the most controversial parts of "ghetto culture", such a thing won't exist here before the 2040s. In clear English, it was one of the main reasons of mockery of the fashion style prevalent in worker class, and especially favela, masculinity, among anyone non-poor, and Brazil is very serious on what degree in the social pyramid you are, thus things regarded as "ridiculous poor" aren't well-received by middle class white people. Surely just a haircut won't make neo-Nazis throw gasoline and put fire at you, but it is a very ill-received and perpetuated stereotype, and badly done mohawks and fauxhawks DO lead to mockery for this.

That this was popularized into hipsters and flamboyant gays, the "extreme opposite" in the Brazilian masculinity spectrum, is SURELY a thing. But it isn't the same thing, because those traditional worker class, especially favela, machos, would never ever ever ever comb their hair straight as the "faggot emos", with the risk of getting beaten up by their vigilante friends for being an equivalent of what people in America call "ghey". Then I gave explanation and sources that everyone in Brazil really thinks combing your hair straight into fringes, wings or other exotic hairstyles is something for either flamboyant gay guys open to demonstrate their flamboyantness to the world, or our "manliest men", because you get bullied for people thinking you are an emo (they don't even know what emo is, because our emos never did exactly know what they were doing despite people calling it a movement).

So yeah, you re-wrote it to mean it is the same process, the same 'hardcore punk' revival (WTH, poor people were just copying football players' hairstyles -_-), essentially deleting the particular social context I explained on it. Lguipontes (talk) 23:59, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hologram trend

Someone on Fashion Police mentioned a recent hologram trend; seems to hold water: [2] -- Beland (talk) 01:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hippie look??

I don't see anyone wearing hippie inspired clothing currently. It does say that was popular in the 1990s but I don't see a complete 90s revival in this decade. The '10s decade is not a second '90s decade. The same here with grunge - some elements of grunge is coming back but we are not seeing a complete grunge comeback that is similar to the '90s. Not too many people are wearing flannel shirts as much as you think - the fashion style has become actually pretty fashionable in the last few years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.168.254.184 (talk) 14:54, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A lot more women have started wearing 60s and 70s clothes again since Autumn 2016. Some of the high street stores have also started selling mens clothes with 70s styling as of March 2017.

Comeback of dresses and skirts in women

I seen a trend this summer that more younger women that are in their teens and twenties are wearing dresses/skirts as opposed to shorts and tank tops. There are dresses and skirts of many different styles but I see a lot of sundresses and you are starting to see lots of floor length skirts, and the miniskirt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.251.178.141 (talk) 08:05, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You learned this much in only weeks? You sure pay attention. (It's still spring here, BTW) Thanks fashion, you couldn't have done my heart and/or my lower heart better. Wait, are jeans on the decline, too? What about those funnel-like dresses of roughly knee length, is that a trend? Is that a sundress? Those things are so arousing and/or endearing, depending on the girl. Are those non-narrow, knee-length/slightly higher, tulip-shaped skirts+dresses trending? They're so arousing. Lois Griffin or Marge Simpson wearing either of those would turn me on. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"more younger women that are in their teens and twenties are wearing dresses/skirts as opposed to shorts and tank tops" What rubbish. Women have always worn skirts and dresses, especially in hot weather

As long as I remember, teenagers and twenty somethings always wore jeans. Very rarely, I seen a teenage girl with a dress or a skirt, unless it was some formal occasion. About 2013 or 2014, I was starting to see teenage girls and even twenty somethings wear dresses and skirts once again. Jeans and shorts are not being replaced, but it looks like that jeans and shorts are not a uniform look for every teenager as it was about 10 years ago. Older adults traditionally did wear dresses and skirts, but it looks like even elderly women are wearing jeans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.112.120.65 (talk) 03:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No more One Direction pics!

There is already a photo of 1D illustrating the classic preppy look. Please don't add any more, because one picture is enough!

Year sections

I think that 2013 should be in the mid 10s because it's nearer to 2015 than 2010. Pickuptha'Musket (talk) 20:34, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some other users think the mid 2010s start in 2014, and end in either 2015, 2016 or 2017. I just want some consensus for all these wikipedia pages on fashion. Peace and love. -Ossie

Not that it matters since the mid-2010's section needs to be rewritten entirely anyway, since it's biased and has no real basis in reality. Based on an article relating to catwalk fashions it's saying that grey and black are extremely popular and that neon is out in Europe and America. Unless this person has recently become color blind without noticing, or doesn't know the difference between Couture and street fashion, this is an outright lie. Anybody who's walked into in mall in America in the last year can tell you that you'll immediately be assaulted by a rainbow of neon and pastel. Not that most of us wouldn't love to see less eye searing fashion, but this article is clearly incorrect. -CR

Inshallah, American fashion is years behind Europe. Here in the UK most shops stopped selling the bright neon colours in 2013, and these days grey, black and white are the dominant colours

If trying to trisect evenly the closest lines are 2013.0 and 2017.0, so 2010-2012, 2013-2016 and 2017-2019. If the fashion of 2013 was more like 2012 than 2014 (how would I know) then maybe it should be considered early though. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 05:49, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on 2010s in fashion

Cyberbot II has detected links on 2010s in fashion which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.latest-hairstyles.com/kids/boys/10-super-cute-hairstyles.html
Triggered by \blatest-hairstyles\.com on the global blacklist
http://www.latest-hairstyles.com/kids/spring.html
Triggered by \blatest-hairstyles\.com on the global blacklist
http://www.latest-hairstyles.com/kids/winter.html
Triggered by \blatest-hairstyles\.com on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:24, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2010s in fashion article in the news.

For those who haven't seen it, the 21 October issue of The Signpost says: "2010s in fashion: Slate describes the Wikipedia page 2010s in fashion as "the most haunting document of our time" (October 20)." Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-10-21/In the media - scroll down to the "In Brief" section. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 04:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Casual Wear

One thing that strikes me, looking at [3], is that a lot of standard, everyday fashion hasn't really changed a whole lot in 20+ years. A lot of people wear more or less the same thing they were wearing back in the 1990s. This isn't really made note of in the article, but the people in that picture from the 90s could walk around today and not look even remotely unusual or dated. Titanium Dragon (talk) 11:52, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe in America. Most British and Italian men have a sense of pride in their appearance [citation needed], and tend to dress smarter [so much citation needed] now than they did in the early 2000s. Plaid shirts and slim jeans happen to be popular in 2015 because 90s nostalgia is a big fad, just like the 80s revival in the 2000s, the 70s revival in the 90s or the 50s revival in the 80s. There are also many differences: for example tweed is very popular now for suits and smart casual jackets, but only a nerd or old man would have worn it in 1995 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Osama57 (talk • contribs)

Yeah, I'd agree with this more. I'd say American fashion has slowed down to a much greater extent than it has in Europe & Asia, but then again, I doubt there would be many sources out there to support this assessment. --Half past formerly SUFCboy 22:59, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It seems more like American fashion just went in a different direction. Plus, the only people who still dress like it's the 90's are 30-something straight guys who think that plaid is the best thing ever. Also, skinny jeans were not very popular for men in the 90s, you might be thinking of "cigarette" jeans. It might be that plaid shirts and jeans are just a staple of men's casual fashion that started in the 1990s and before. It's kind of hard to judge a whole country on an popular but unfortunate outfit, isn't it? -CR

Too many rappers

One or two pictures is fine, but we currently have three photos of G-Eazy, Joey Badass and Tyga wearing almost identical all black outfits. How about some variation, or a photo of the three rappers together?

Peace and love - Ossie

Unisex trends section impending

Here in the mid 2010s a lot of trends are overlapping genders and I feel the need to create a section for such trends in the near future. Just a heads up.Trillfendi (talk) 20:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where are these unisex trends fashionable? America? We need more info on this.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2010s in fashion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Late 2010s fashion

Next year, they will make the late 2010s fashion, which is 2017-2019. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C8:C003:27D0:989:1A2B:C515:A941 (talk) 22:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Has anyone noticed any new trends in their city this year? Here in London 70s and 90s influenced fashions remain popular, a lot of younger women dress to look older and more professional, and some guys have started wearing baggy clothes again.

Also, a lot of guys in the UK wear darker coloured jeans, white trainers and oversized black anoraks these days. Checked shirts, knitted sweaters and undercuts are still common, but many younger men leave the hair unstyled rather than slick it back, like a very early Beatles haircut or the look of the mid 2000s when quiffs and buzzcuts began to be grown out into longer styles. This photo of Louis Tomlinson shows the typical unstyled hair and all black outfit incorporating retro sportswear. And on a completely unrelated note, there are these weird garterbelts for men designed to prevent a shirt becoming untucked - Ossie.

There's another look that's becoming common for women in the UK, with lots of pale blue denim, white T shirts with Americana, graffiti and old school tattoo designs like eagles, hearts, skulls, revolvers and snakes, silver jewellery with beads and Old West designs, jeans with floral embroidery, suede fringed handbags, and black leather jackets. I think the best way of describing it would be as a fusion of biker, cowgirl and 70s hard rocker.

Awful article

This is the worst WP article I've read in a long time. It's just a long list of referenced or weakly referenced dubious assertions by people who think they're hugely fashionable. How did it get through the vetting process on creation? Talk about giving WP a bad name. --Ef80 (talk) 20:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree the fashion articles on Wikipedia are horrid especially this one. Its excessively long and tortuous to even glance at because everyone needs to add their two cents and every and anything is being tacked on.The whole article is just a list, because a billion things need to be included, so there is no context or explanation. Its just lists created from fashion magazine articles and blogsStarbwoy (talk) 00:08, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Skinny jeans are NOT "DEAD" YET

We are on January '17, in the late 10s dawn yet but there is already a section about fashion from 2017 onwards. How is it possible to be so untrue about fashion? Fashion is related to business but is not that artificial, things change fluently, is not possible to be in a whole new fashion reality after switching from December '16 to January . Suddenly I read in this section that skinny jeans are already dead. Since when? Maybe in some cases of the fashion catwalks but for sure not on the street. People still wear skinny jeans, both men and women. It's not the only type of jeans or trousers used but it's still the most popular one. This article is written with a retrospective perspective, which is completely out of place and even absurd while we still live in that time period. Please think about it and stop letting fashion houses distort reality about fashion. By the way, early 2010s last from 2010 to 2013 (about May), mid 2010s from May 2013 to August 2016 and late 2010s from September 2016 to 2019. Some adjusments should be made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidReyAlvite (talk • contribs) 22:15, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could one not say that so far late-2010s fashions are like 2016 until a difference is noticeable? What people wear in the late-2010s exists as soon as the late-2010s do. Now are organic or numerical divisions more important? i.e. 20th and 19th century vs. short twentieth century (1914-1991), long nineteenth century (1789-1914). Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 19:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes its true what he said, people seem to be getting their ideas from fashion magazines as I also mentioned. Fashion magazines and high end fashion places are usually forecasting from samples, way before the clothes actually get to the manufacturer. Skinny Jeans is on its last leg, but its still going strong.Starbwoy (talk) 00:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2010s in fashion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File nominated for deletion on commons

file:c:File:Friends Coachella style.jpg Reason:No permission indicated subpage:

Message automatically deposited by a robot on 09:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC).

File nominated for deletion on commons

file:c:File:Undercut hairstyle.jpg Reason:No permission indicated subpage:

Message automatically deposited by a robot on 09:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harideepan (talk • contribs)

Internet trends

Reminds me of early 2000s. Ive been seeing it for over a year online and it seems very popular. I don't know what you would call it and I don't feel like doing a lot of research. Ill just post this link and someone else can decide https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/laurenstrapagiel/tiktok-egirls — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.104.71.67 (talk) 07:53, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Supreme2015awesome.jpeg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:07, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Egirl example aesthetic 2.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]