Talk:New Hampshire

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

United States: New Hampshire Top‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Top-importance).

Appalachia Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Hampshire was nominated as a Geography and places good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 23, 2015, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Section sizes

Section size for New Hampshire (48 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	16,459	16,459
History	6,065	6,065
Geography	11,768	20,544
Flora and fauna	578	578
Climate	5,987	5,987
Metropolitan areas	2,211	2,211
Demographics	972	25,243
Population	14,154	14,154
Birth data	4,650	4,650
Religion	5,467	5,467
Economy	8,712	11,234
Largest employers	2,522	2,522
Law and government	1,417	21,758
Governing documents	405	405
Branches of government	2,416	2,416
Local government	1,644	1,644
Politics	2,678	15,876
New Hampshire primary	3,519	3,519
Elections	6,685	6,685
Free State Project	2,994	2,994
Transportation	19	8,317
Highways	3,051	3,051
Air	592	592
Public transportation	4,253	4,253
Freight railways	402	402
Education	293	4,048
High schools	2,469	2,469
Colleges and universities	1,286	1,286
Media	10	3,273
Daily newspapers	836	836
Other publications	1,845	1,845
Radio stations	76	76
Television stations	506	506
Sports	3,757	3,757
Culture	3,071	6,181
In fiction	17	3,110
Theater	856	856
Comics	611	611
Television	1,626	1,626
Notable people	807	807
See also	143	143
Notes	24	24
References	29	29
Further reading	503	503
External links	64	2,153
State government	215	215
U.S. Government	592	592
Other	1,282	1,282
Total	130,538	130,538

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by .

Drug infested Den

I am from the UK.

Why did President Trump call New Hampshire a "drug infested den"? What does that mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.224.32.138 (talk) 16:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@87.224.32.138: "Drug infested" is a reference to the Opioid epidemic and "den" is a reference to an Opium den. See also the phrase "den of vice", among others. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on New Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"New Hampshre" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New Hampshre. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"New Hampster" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect New Hampster. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

too much information in massive chart!

An editor just added a very large chart showing complete racial/ethnic and age breakdown of the five biggest cities/towns in the state - in my humble opinon that is WAY too detailed information for the general state article. If necessary it could be broken out into a separate article but it doesn't belong here, I'd say. Any thoughts? - 16:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidWBrooks (talk • contribs)

I understand your concern, DavidWBrooks. It's important to maintain the relevance and readability of Wikipedia articles. While detailed information can be valuable, it's essential to strike a balance. If this chart significantly detracts from the general state article's readability or overwhelms it with data, considering a separate article might be a reasonable suggestion. It's always a good practice to engage in constructive discussions and find a consensus within the Wikipedia community. What are the thoughts of others on this matter? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.96.13.213 (talk) 18:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think this data is fine where it is. It doesn't really impact the readability of the article. Garsh (talk) 23:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"New Hampster" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect New Hampster has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 18 § New Hampster until a consensus is reached. Batrachoseps (talk) 03:59, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]