Jump to content

User talk:Cassiopeia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:CASSIOPEIA)
No copies of primary sources

While using a public domain work as the basis for a Wikipedia article may be a good idea (see public domain resources for a selection), please do not include large source documents within articles. We try to collect free (public domain or copyleft) source documents in a single place, Wikisource, where they can be annotated and translated. This reduces duplication across wikis, and frees articles from the context of the source documents. Keep in mind that Wikipedia articles are subject to merciless editing, so if a document is the subject of an article, yet is included in it, it might not be the same document for long! Even long quotation sections should be moved‍—‌to Wikiquote.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}


Help me

[edit]

Could you please help me, and teach me how to fight against vandalism. MersmanD (talk) 21:19, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MersmanD Good day and thank you for interested in joining CVUA program. To join the program the editor needs to have at least total main space edit of 250. At the moment you have only 98 - see HERE-1 and secondly the editor needs to be lifted from user account block for 6 months. You have 2 username blocks - see HERE- 2 (understand you didnt know about the Wikipedia guidelines when you started editing). Please come back next year on March 14, 2025 and I will set up the program for you. I am happy that you took TWA program and believe you have already gain some fundamental Wikipedia guidelines. Pop back here if you have any questions or need assistance for I am here to help. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 06:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Ibtissam73 (10:46, 28 November 2024)

[edit]

Bonjour comment éditer une citation --Ibtissam73 (talk) 10:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ibtissam73 Good day. To add a citation, you can use the "horizontal format" of Template:Cite web or Template:Cite Book if the source is from the web or book respectively. By the way, this is English Wikipedia, so all content added/changed need to be written in English. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 01:10, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Bosula (12:51, 29 November 2024)

[edit]

Hello Casseiopia, I changed the name of the page ryanoid to diamide insecticides, and looked up "what links here" with the intention of changing the egregious term "ryanoid" to "diamide" on as many wikipedia pages as possible. However on clicking on "what links here I obtained a list of hundreds of pages only a few of which link to ryanoid or diamide. Am I doing something wrong? --Bosula (talk) 12:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:44, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Question from Merychippus (08:25, 30 November 2024)

[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your response to my earlier request. I have moved the in-progress page to draft space here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:The_Names_of_a_Hare (please let me know if I made any mistake with that)

As for your comments about notability, I want to point out the citation I included to the 1935 article by Alan Ross, which contains extensive discussion of the language used in the poem. I did find a copy online, but as it was a scanned copy on someone's personal web site, I guessed that it wouldn't be appropriate to link directly to that. Do you agree? In any case I was able to confirm the contents by requesting a copy from my local library.

Similarly, I found a second scholarly article responding to the 1935 one and disputing a few points of textual interpretation, but without including some very specific etymologies in the draft article itself, I didn't see a good way to cite it. Do you think there's any value in adding it as an additional reference just to provide further reading? --Merychippus (talk) 08:25, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]