User talk:Cytkory

Welcome

Hello, Cytkory, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Epicgenius^{(talk to me • see my contributions)} 20:30, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Edit summary

If you would please consider using edit summaries as they are extremely helpful to your fellow editors and are considered standard and good practice on wikipedia. Please see Help:Edit summary. Thanks in advance. Blethering Scot 21:42, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of American television shows currently in production, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deal With It (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	In recognition of your continual updates to the lists of productions at West End theatre and Broadway theatre. Thanks for doing that so I don't have to! oknazevad (talk) 04:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

West End theatre

When moving a show from Upcoming productions into the main theatre table, can you please move the source with it. Thanks.Blethering Scot 19:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can i once again ask you to move the source with the production into the main table. Its important that this is verifiable and at present by not moving the source with the show it is not.Blethering Scot 12:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of Longest Running Broadway, Top 100 or All 1000+

Cytkory and Discographer, you both appear to be regular recent contributors to the article "List of the Longest-running Broadway Shows".

I am confident you would have a knowledgeable opinion regarding my question at this Talk link. Could you please take a look and and make any edits you deem fit? Hopefully others will see this particular Talk item as well, but I wanted to make sure you both had a chance to chime in. Thanks. Jmg38 (talk) 20:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Late Night with Jimmy Fallon episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Weekend (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to List of Late Night with Jimmy Fallon episodes does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Blethering Scot 16:57, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

West End theatre

Hi, can you explain why you delete the sources from the article when moving from upcoming to the theatre section. Because you don't use edit summaries it does not appear obvious. The sources verify the information in the article. Also why do you later remove if someone else has added to the table. I just can't see an obvious reason. Any reply would be appreciated. Blethering Scot 13:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Cytkory although I do appreciate the yeoman's work he does on the West End and Broadway theatre articles keeping the list of current shows up to date.

My guess is that they are no longer strictly needed, as the ability to verify which show is playing at a given theatre is easily verified by millions of people just by walking by. Remember, WP:V does not require online sources for verification, and these may even fall under the category of WP:BLUE. Also, the reference used to list a show on the upcoming productions list may not be entirely accurate by the time the show opens and so would actually be outdated to include in the current shows lists (strictly speaking, all the source does is verify the announcement of the upcoming production, not that it has opened).

That said, Scot is right, Cy, you should use edit summaries more frequently, so others can know what the edit is about from their watchlists without needing to actually check. You do good work overall, but these are helpful ways to do even better work.oknazevad (talk) 22:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The source is not redundant entirely and is still valid, it should either be replaced with an updated source of which there are many on West End productions or the source should remain. Ive been trying to get a response of any kind from Cytkory for quite some time through a variety of ways. I have a lot of concerns depite the good work which is why frustratingly I'm trying to keep this as calm as possible. Oh and someone being able to walk by and see a show is open is strictly speaking original research and we cant verify an encyclopaedia in that way.Blethering Scot 23:03, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

West End theatre

This is your final warning. Do not remove sources at West End theatre without adding alternative ones as you are not discussing this at all or providing edit summaries to give any reason for this.Blethering Scot 13:31, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to West End theatre‎ does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Blethering Scot 14:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Blethering Scot 14:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Blethering Scot. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Broadway theatre without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Do not remove sources that are still valid to production and includes, dates opened, theatre it is in without replacing with an alternative source. When closure is announced another source should be added in addition next to closure date. Please do not remove references without replacing with a suitable i.e. equivalent source. Verifiability is an issue. Blethering Scot 12:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Conan episodes (2014), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Jefferies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of shows from current list

Please do not remove show's like you did here at 2:53 am on the day of there final performances. The shows do not take place until 7:30pm therefore at the time of your removal they are still playing. There is no valid reason that meant you had to remove prematurly prior to this.Blethering Scot 18:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at West End theatre‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Its not acceptable to remove a valid source leaving information unverified, without replacing with another one. This is not the first time you have done this. Blethering Scot 16:55, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 in American television, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Quest and Rising Star (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Neil Patrick Harris, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 16:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at West End theatre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Removing valid sources without adding replacements leaving any type of content unverified is vandalism. You have been advised and then warned many times now. Enough is enough Blethering Scot 12:19, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Broadway theatre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Removal of source without justification or replacing with another source, this is classic vandalism. Blethering Scot 18:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 in American television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Royals (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Broadway theatre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Removal of sources leaving content unverified. No replacement sources added or explanation given. Ongoing history of this. Blethering Scot 22:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at West End theatre‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Removal of sources leaving content unverified. No replacement sources added or explanation given. You have an ongoing history of this on various articles. Please Cease and desist. Blethering Scot 11:03, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Broadway Theatre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 20:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at West End theatre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Once again you have removed valid sources from an article without replacing them leaving it unverifiable. This is your last warning. Blethering Scot 12:06, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for 48 hours, because of long-term persistent disruptive editing. Considering how long the problems have been going on, the number of messages you have received, and the fact that you have made no attempt at all to respond to those messages, it is amazing that you have not been blocked long ago. You have been receiving messages about removing sources and other content from articles since November 2013, but you have continued to do so, as for example in this edit. Amazingly, in this edit you even posted a hidden message to other editors, saying "All upcoming shows must be confirmed and sourced or may be removed", and yet you nevertheless continued to remove sources yourself. You may believe that you have good reasons for what you have been doing, but if so you have never made any attempt to explain those reasons, whether by replying to messages on this page, by posting to article talk pages, or by using edit summaries. You have been receiving messages asking you to use edit summaries since June 2013, but as far as I can see you have never once done so. (I have checked your last 1500 edits, and you certainly did not use edit summaries in any of those.) Likewise, you have never once posted to any talk page, even in the face of numerous messages expressing concerns about your editing. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and people who choose to contribute need to be willing to collaborate with other editors, not to just do their own thing and ignore everyone else. The persistent nature of your disruptive editing, continuing for two years, would justify a much longer block, but since you have not been blocked before I am giving you a short block, in the hope that it will call your attention to the issues involved, and that you will now respond to other editors' concerns. If you believe there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:19, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Late Night with Seth Meyers episodes (2015), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Anderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West End theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Breakfast at Tiffany's. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Studio 54, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. User keeps inserting the name of a 19th-century French play/novel, Thérèse Raquin, as the "production" of 1970s/80s disco Studio 54 without explanation. Disruptive editing. Moncrief (talk) 19:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Broadway theatre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Electric Burst^{(Electron firings)}_(Zaps) 23:17, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Late Night with Seth Meyers episodes (2016), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Kelly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Late Late Show with James Corden episodes (2016), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jimmy Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cytkory. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon episodes (2017) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon episodes (2017) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon episodes (2017) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KAP03 (talk) 17:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cytkory. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Late Night with Seth Meyers episodes (2018), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrick Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cytkory. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Cytkory. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of management of The Walt Disney Company Sourcing

Hello, I'm Spshu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of management of The Walt Disney Company, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Spshu (talk) 14:21, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Late Night with Seth Meyers episodes (2019), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Kelly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Broadway theatre, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Removing valid sources without adding replacements leaving any type of content unverified, such as Frozen is vandalism. You have previously been warned and blocked for the same issue. Blethering Scot 19:38, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Costume Design of a Musical

Hello, Cytkory,

Thanks for creating Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Costume Design of a Musical! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Gold Derby Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Murphy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon episodes (2019), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Desus & Mero (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 9th Critics' Choice Television Awards into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Bennv3771 (talk) 02:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Conan episodes (2020) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Conan episodes (2020), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 07:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Conan episodes (2020) (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Conan episodes (2020) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Conan episodes (2020), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 01:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cytkory! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 01:17, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Conan episodes (2020) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Conan episodes (2020), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 01:41, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Conan episodes (2020) (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Conan episodes (2020) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Conan episodes (2020), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 01:41, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cytkory was:

Sources are in

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cytkory (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Derby Award for Best Supporting Actress moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gold Derby Award for Best Supporting Actress, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article shows evidence of meeting Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. b uidhe 14:19, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Kids' Choice Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Holland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Derby Award for Best Drama Series moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gold Derby Award for Best Drama Series, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develop the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please ensure that references are also provided for why the award is notable. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 11:05, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you move it back? The summary "revert" doesn't address any of the concerns I raised DannyS712 (talk) 19:34, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Before moving Gold Derby Award for Best Drama Series back into mainspace again I would recommend taking a look at similar lists such as Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Drama Series. This would help on how to integrate sources and references into the article. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 20:49, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gold Derby Award for Best Drama Series (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gold Derby Award for Best Drama Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gold Derby Award for Best Drama Series, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:39, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gold Derby Award for Best Drama Series (February 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Subject not even remotely shown to be notable and page creator just resubmitted without making a single edit to improve the article.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gold Derby Award for Best Director for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gold Derby Award for Best Director is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Derby Award for Best Director until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dorama285 (talk) 18:42, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Derby Award for Best Movie/Limited Series Actor moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gold Derby Award for Best Movie/Limited Series Actor, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 01:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Limited Series Actor (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gold Derby Award for Best Movie/Limited Series Actor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gold Derby Award for Best Movie/Limited Series Actor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 08:05, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced articles

Please do not move articles out of draft space until they have a reference. ... discospinster _talk 15:26, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Magitroopa. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Magitroopa (talk) 21:52, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gold Derby Award for Best Supporting Actress for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gold Derby Award for Best Supporting Actress is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Derby Award for Best Supporting Actress (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:32, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020 warning

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of management of The Walt Disney Company, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. "It was fine the way it was!" when incorrect is not sufficent. Removal of sourcing is against WP policy a information in a must be verifiable. Spshu (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of management of The Walt Disney Company. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Spshu (talk) 13:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of management of The Walt Disney Company, you may be blocked from editing. This is not game playing. Discussion has already been started on the talk page. Spshu (talk) 23:09, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of management of The Walt Disney Company. Spshu (talk) 16:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Spshu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of management of The Walt Disney Company, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Spshu (talk) 16:36, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a community process

Hi there, I am an administrator on the English Wikipedia. This is a community editing project, and as such, you are required to discuss changes that other people oppose. This is part of our Bold, Revert, Discuss (BRD) process. When an edit you make is reverted, your option is to open a discussion to seek consensus, not to resubmit the change. If you are not willing to do that, then you will very quickly wind up with your editing privileges revoked. Some of your edits, like this, remove useful content like the templates at the top of the article in favour of some version that you find better for some unexplained reason. I would hope that you would be able to explain why that version is superior to the last version, in detail, on the talk page, otherwise, the other version should remain. You can't stonewall the improvement of articles, and also remain silent on your objections. Further, you rarely use edit summaries to explain your rationale for most of your changes, which is also unhelpful. Please get it together and stop with the knee-jerk reversions. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:16, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 05:15, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Temporarily blocked from List of management of The Walt Disney Company

Since you seem to have difficulty understanding that you do not have ownership of List of management of The Walt Disney Company, and since you seem to be stonewalling changes without participating in discussion, I have temporarily interrupted your ability to edit there. I hope you will start participating in discussion in good faith instead of blanket reverting Spshu's edits without sufficient explanation. If the anti-community behaviour continues after the block expiration, the next block will be more severe. Naturally, I don't want that. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:12, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Cyphoidbomb. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Diffs: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:30, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:SEASON

Hey! Per MOS:SEASON, we should avoid using seasons to refer to times of the year. So for edits like this, can you use a different wording? Early and Late usually work from my experience. BOVINEBOY2008 20:53, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Variety Sketch Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Roberts.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:45, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gold Derby Award for Best Movie/Limited Series Actor

Hello, Cytkory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Limited Series Actor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gold Derby Award for Best Drama Series

Hello, Cytkory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gold Derby Award for Best Drama Series".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gold Derby Award for Best Drama Actress

Hello, Cytkory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gold Derby Award for Best Drama Actress".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:33, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gold Derby Award for Best Movie/Limited Series Actress

Hello, Cytkory. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Limited Series Actress".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:Spshu, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Do not delete content without their consent. WesternAtlanticCentral (talk) 19:00, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to 2020 United States Senate elections does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! ― Tartan357 ^(Talk) 22:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American politics discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

― Tartan357 ^(Talk) 05:58, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions violation at 2020 United States Senate elections

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2020 United States Senate elections; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ― Tartan357 ^(Talk) 06:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your declarations of winners at this page, and you reverted my revert, citing NYT projections. This has nothing to do with projections. There is not a consensus for how to call races yet, as I said before. I will again direct you to Talk:2020 United States Senate elections#Declaration of winners based on AP projections. You have violated the enforced WP:BRD active arbitration remedy by restoring your reverted edit without seeking consensus. I have reverted your edit as being against consensus. If you continue to edit-war, I will take you to WP:AE, where you may be blocked for violating the discretionary sanction. ― Tartan357 ^(Talk) 05:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a WP: 1RR restriction? WesternAtlanticCentral (talk) 16:15, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of The Late Late Show with James Corden episodes (2016) and other articles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Late Late Show with James Corden episodes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 56th Academy of Country Music Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Young.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Comedy Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maria Ferrari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Disney General Entertainment Content for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney General Entertainment Content is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney General Entertainment Content until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ASUKITE 23:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

This is your only warning; if you assume ownership of articles again, as you did at List of management of The Walt Disney Company, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Please engage on the article talk page. I remind you that content disputes are settled through WP:Consensus, and that WP:Communication is required. Colonestarrice (talk) 08:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Colonestarrice (talk) 20:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cullen328 (talk) 19:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of management of The Walt Disney Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of management of The Walt Disney Company, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of management of The Walt Disney Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Please do not disruptively change credits for the Kids' Choice Awards. They have previously been checked and are all correct. The field is clearly labelled at 'producer', not 'executive producer'. Please stop or discuss the issue elsewhere, but as per the credits, they are all currently correct as-is. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 17:10, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Recording winners for 74th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards

Hey Cytkory, I noticed you've been updating the winners for the Creative Arts Emmys this evening. To avoid adding a bunch of edits, when you add a winner, could you include {{double dagger|alt=Winner}} after the bolded text? I've done it for the awards so far, but I think it would be easiest to do in a single edit and this would avoid possible edit conflicts. Thanks! RunningTiger123 (talk) 00:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Walt Disney Company

Sorry but why did you remove all the information about Marvel Entertainment in the section Content Groups. Without good reason I will revert that edit. ― Kaleeb18^Talk_Caleb 00:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You have been reverted on this multiple times in the past and continue to do so- please see WP:NOTBROKEN. There is no need to 'fix' a link just because it is a redirect to another article. Please stop from further edits of this kind. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 06:58, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please actually review sources before you go ahead with reverting. There are advertisements such as this on the official KCA website saying that it will air Saturday March 4 at 7pm. The information is appropriately sourced, so please stop reverting/removing the information. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 07:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop ignoring WP:NOTBROKEN. You've been warned on this multiple times already. If you continue to ignore this, a further discussion will be held at WP:ANI. I highly suggest you stop now. Magitroopa (talk) 08:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

You've been reverted/explained multiple times that the name of the parameter is 'producer', and as the template instructions state, it is for the, "show's producer". As you simply ignore any and every warning you receive, next will be a discussion at WP:ANI, so I suggest you stop now. Magitroopa (talk) 06:05, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And yes, this has been asked about already. There haven't been any responses, but that doesn't allow you to ignore the template instructions and change it to whatever you feel like changing it to. Follow what the instructions say. Magitroopa (talk) 06:12, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Categories at 75th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards

Hi, I noticed in this edit that you removed the Short Form Animated Program category from this year's ceremony article. I had added it because the fact that a category received no nominations is unusual and should probably be included, and it offers better continuity between years by not implying the category was eliminated entirely. There are also other examples of categories with no nominees that were still included (see 59th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards#Performing). I'd like to put it back but would like to avoid unnecessary edit warring. What are your thoughts? RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion is wait until the Emmys officially release a press release or something that acknowledges that no award was given. I looked at the link you provided and it included a press release. So let's keep it consistent and wait until the TV Academy confirms it. Cytkory (talk) 04:39, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That press release was used since, as a juried category, there was no information in the main nominations list. The official nomination list for this year specifically mentions the lack of nominees: "Note: Submissions were prescreened to determine nominations. None of the submissions received nine-tenths approval, resulting in no nominations this year." That seems like clear-cut confirmation to me. RunningTiger123 (talk) 17:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 57th Annual Country Music Association Awards

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 57th Annual Country Music Association Awards, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon episodes (2024) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of The Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon episodes (2024). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert episodes (2024) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert episodes (2024). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Late Night with Seth Meyers episodes (2024) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of Late Night with Seth Meyers episodes (2024). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and TooSoon. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:32, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. As you have previously been warned, please stop incorrectly changing information on Kids' Choice Awards articles and stick to the guidelines/template instructions, not what you believe is correct. Continuing further may lead to a block on your account. Magitroopa (talk) 15:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Nickelodeon Kids' Choice Awards, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 18:41, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI...

Two recent articles both saying Pauley is the location. It would be wise not to use original research while editing, as that is very unhelpful as well. Magitroopa (talk) 18:49, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Late Night with Seth Meyers episodes (2024), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashley Park.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of Academy Awards ceremonies. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:19, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]