User talk:JoeWiki

Welcome!

Hello, JoeWiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Robdurbar 07:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New articles

Please don't create a new article as a "placeholder" before adding content. Take your time and wait until you have enough info to write at least a stub. Happy editing! Alex (t) 23:41, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Reading Rugby logo.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Reading Rugby logo.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:07, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Creation of new pages

Hi Joewiki,

I'm a newpage patroller. This is with regards to a number of new pages you have created quite recently. I understand that you have created them in good faith. But unless you have substantial information to incluse, it is better to avoid creating pages with a few words. If you have such little trivia on their date of birth and other information about the players you could instead create a table and tabulate them on the main page, London Irish. As of now , the pages you've created are marked for deletion. Sorry abt tht.

Cheers for ur effort. - Chez ^{(Discuss / Email)} • 10:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:LondonIrishDigger.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LondonIrishDigger.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Degas sculpture

Thank you for contributing an article. However, for legal reasons, we cannot accept text that has been copied from pre-existing external websites. You may use them as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences, if you follow what I'm saying. Feel free to re-write the article in your own words. DS 13:57, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What vandalism is not

Please read more about what vandalism is not before making serious accusations. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 19:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If this is about the Reading Fans article there have been persistant deletions which together probably do constitute vandalism. I accept the latest one was probably just an error and I will be more careful next time. JoeWiki 08:43, 01 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments on the Stephen Hunt edit page are pathetic. You don't own the page and you have no justification for removing my edits. Just because Reading Fans like you want to believe Hunt didn't deliberately knee Petr Cech's head in it doesn't make it true. 'Incident' is a better usage. I see from the above comment that I'm not the only one who has a problem with your manipulation of Wikipedia. The Special One 03:00, 05 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The Madejski Stadium.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:The Madejski Stadium.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --ccwaters 13:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Explanation added to the image discussion page. Thank you. --JoeWiki 18:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Čech breaks Hulse's ankle in horrific injury[1]

(title modified by JoeWiki)
Why does a paragraph about Rob Hulse breaking his ankle belong on the Petr Čech page? SteveO 22:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was an accident but Petr Čech broke it. Čech raced out to smother his effort and in the collision the Blades top-scorer suffered an horrific injury when his ankle appeared to snap beneath him [2]. (JoeWiki 22:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

I did delete it with a reason, the reason being that, imo, it is non-notable. Wikipedia is not a news service. SteveO 22:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you cannot distinguish between someone clattering into a goalkeeper with his knee, leaving him with a fractured skull, and someone falling awkwardly over a trailing leg,[3] then that's up to you. I disagree that it is notable in Cech's career. The incident has received minimal coverage in the media (Match of the Day devoted more time to Paul Robinson's goal), not even Neil Warnock accused Cech of wrongdoing. If it was deliberate, or Cech's responsibility was very ambiguous (as Hunt's was), or it received extensive coverage in the media, or Cech received a red card, then it would be notable. But that's not the case. I would also urge you to be cautious when accusing others of vandalism. SteveO 12:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Ian Wood-Smith

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ian Wood-Smith, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ian Wood-Smith seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ian Wood-Smith, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:00, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's usual for Directors of Premier League football clubs to appear on Wikipedia though if the 'other Wikipedia user' wants it so much then delete it. JoeWiki (talk) 21:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ian Wood-Smith

I have nominated Ian Wood-Smith, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Wood-Smith. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jmlk 1 7 02:45, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Nomads R.F.C.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Nomads R.F.C.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

South West Division One

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of South West Division One, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jgames.co.uk/title/National_Division_Three_South. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jon Fearn

An editor has nominated Jon Fearn, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Fearn and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Madejskiville

A tag has been placed on Madejskiville, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it is an implausible redirect with obvious links to the town, but without sufficient widespread use other than a mention here

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Booglamay (talk · contributions) - 10:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:HobnobAnyone logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HobnobAnyone logo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 17:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Time-magazine-cover-thebigthree.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Time-magazine-cover-thebigthree.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 15:47, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BusinessWeek Cover Rick Wagoner.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BusinessWeek Cover Rick Wagoner.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 13:31, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RadioTimes-magazine-cover-08-Sep-07.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:RadioTimes-magazine-cover-08-Sep-07.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 13:41, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Director Cover August 2007.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Director Cover August 2007.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 13:41, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Fair use BusinessWeek magazine covers

Orphaned non-free media (File:Charles Russell LLP.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:Charles Russell LLP.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello JoeWiki! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 5 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 9 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Brendan Venter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jeremy Davidson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Justin Bishop (rugby player) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Neal Hatley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ronnie Blackman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Digger (mascot)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Digger (mascot). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digger (mascot). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:ICI people

CfD nomination of Category:ICI executives

Orphaned non-free image File:Reading Rugby logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reading Rugby logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of the largest global technology companies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of the largest global technology companies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the largest global software companies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:08, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: George Blackall Simonds

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as George Blackall Simonds, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.berkshirehistory.com/bios/gbsimonds.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:George Blackall Simonds and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, George Blackall Simonds, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:George Blackall Simonds with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:George Blackall Simonds. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:George Blackall Simonds saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! The page you created in 2007 appears to contain material copyrighted 2004. Please excuse me if I am wrong about this. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Largest shopping centres in the United Kingdom

Template:Largest shopping centres in the United Kingdom has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:41, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Screwfix Cover Autumn 2007.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Screwfix Cover Autumn 2007.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 18:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tanner De Witt.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tanner De Witt.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charles Russell LLP

The article Charles Russell LLP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:37, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Friends of FundeCruz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Friends of FundeCruz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friends of FundeCruz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 13:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruta del Sol (motor race) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruta del Sol (motor race) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruta del Sol (motor race) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]