User talk:Nono64

For previous discussions see : User talk:Nono64/Archives (30 October 2006 to 26 October 2011)

Discussion of molecular formula disambiguation

Greetings! Based on your participation in creating the category, I thought you might be interested in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#Category:Molecular formula disambiguation pages. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Natural phenols and polyphenols

Wikipedia:WikiProject Natural phenols and polyphenols, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Natural phenols and polyphenols and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Natural phenols and polyphenols during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Axem Titanium (talk) 03:08, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Listof cysts of the jaws listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Listof cysts of the jaws. Since you had some involvement with the Listof cysts of the jaws redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Albacore (talk) 22:41, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 4'-Hydroxy-5,7-dimethoxy-8-methylflavan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 4'-Hydroxy-5,7-dimethoxy-8-methylflavan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4'-Hydroxy-5,7-dimethoxy-8-methylflavan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ChemNerd (talk) 20:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Watcha

The article Watcha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No apparent notability. Fails WP:Music

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. De728631 (talk) 21:15, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Louis Späth

The article Louis Späth has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bgwhite (talk) 00:45, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gap junction protein, alpha 1, 43kDa

A tag has been placed on Gap junction protein, alpha 1, 43kDa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

The page title has been entered with an error - but instead of deleting it, its author then moved the entire page to a new, more correct title. Currently, nothing links here and there is hardly an chance this erroneous title would ever come up in a search.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. kashmiri 23:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gap junction protein, alpha 1, 43kDa listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gap junction protein, alpha 1, 43kDa. Since you had some involvement with the Gap junction protein, alpha 1, 43kDa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). kashmiri 08:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of N39 roads

The article List of N39 roads has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

DAB to nonexistent pages

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nouniquenames (talk) 14:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation of species

Hi Nono64, Bkonrad suggested you may be able to help me with disambiguation of species - the context is here -> Talk:Grey oak . Widefox; talk 10:05, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

XXL (2004 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect XXL (2004 film). Since you had some involvement with the XXL (2004 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). France3470 (talk) 01:49, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lauren Hoffman

The article Lauren Hoffman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable musician per WP:MUSICBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ukexpat (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lauren Hoffman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lauren Hoffman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Hoffman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ukexpat (talk) 14:18, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A11 road (Latvia)

A tag has been placed on A11 road (Latvia), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Only infobox, no text

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Edgars2007 ^{(talk/contribs)} 17:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request to take part in a survey

Hi there. I would very much appreciate it if you could spend ~2 minutes and take a short survey - a project trying to understand why the most active Wikipedia contributors (such as yourself) may reduce their activity, or retire. I sent you an email with details, if you did not get it please send me a wikiemail, so that I can send you an email with the survey questions. I would very much appreciate your cooperation, as you are among the most active Wikipedia editors who show a pattern of reduced activity, and thus your response would be extremely valuable. Thanks! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:01, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nono64. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Wrightia antidysenterica

Hello Nono64, in your article on Wrightia antidysenterica you mention that this species is sometimes mistaken for Holarrhena pubescens and have made a redirect from Holarrhena pubescens. I wonder if instead you meant that Holarrhena antidysenterica is a synonym for W. antidysenterica, as H. antidysenterica is mentioned in later revisions to the article and I cannot find a source for the H. pubescens synonymity. Thanks, Declan Declangi (talk) 02:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This has been cleared up by Plantdrew with H. pubescens now a separate article. Declangi (talk) 02:56, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked into it further, but I'm basically doing WP:SYNTHESIS to try to make sense of it, so can't really cite any sources. I think it's best to treat Wrightia antidysenterica and Holarrhena pubescens separately for now, but it's really quite a mess. W. antidysenterica is used as a name in contexts about an ornamental plant. Holarrhena antidysenterica/pubescens refer to one species (or two closely related species) in contexts about medicinal plants. The ornamental and medicinal contexts may all be about the same plant, but the botanical literature is quite confused and I'd have to resort to WP:SYNTHESIS regardless of whether there are really two plants or one. I've made some notes with links to sources at User:Plantdrew/Holarrhena_pubescens. Plantdrew (talk) 04:22, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Antonio Llanos listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Antonio Llanos. Since you had some involvement with the Antonio Llanos redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Declangi (talk) 01:41, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Latin words found in species names

Category:Latin words found in species names, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:21, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Birulia (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Birulia (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:10, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Physics disambiguation pages

Category:Physics disambiguation pages, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 19:39, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About C. sativa

Look at :

194.199.4.203 (talk) 17:38, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	How are you thank you for your edits i want you to do some thing to me that is to check my edit in the midsternal article.I think my edit is true because it is indicated in the article that the midsternal line is a vertical line.thank yuo in advance. 1339861mzb (talk) 19:02, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:West-Virginia-geo-stub listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:West-Virginia-geo-stub. Since you had some involvement with the Template:West-Virginia-geo-stub redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:10, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

芹菜糖苷 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 芹菜糖苷. Since you had some involvement with the 芹菜糖苷 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 03:14, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

टेटु listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect टेटु. Since you had some involvement with the टेटु redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - The ChampionMan 1234 04:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of D2 (clothing) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article D2 (clothing) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D2 (clothing) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 04:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

…recent comment on the confounded listing of phenols, at [1]. I look forward to your reply at that Talk page. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 05:35, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of male rappers listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of male rappers. Since you had some involvement with the List of male rappers redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 21:17, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Max Fleischer (disambiguation)

The article Max Fleischer (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:2DABS, hatnotes are best

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

N49 (astronomy) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect N49 (astronomy). Since you had some involvement with the N49 (astronomy) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:41, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Russo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Steve Russo. Since you had some involvement with the Steve Russo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. – Fayenatic London 07:43, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Species abbreviation

Template:Species abbreviation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Augurar (talk) 05:22, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reunified listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reunified. Since you had some involvement with the Reunified redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:33, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Big Brother Bot

The article Big Brother Bot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The1337gamer (talk) 20:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Instrument maker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Instrument maker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instrument maker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Anne Delong (talk) 15:38, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tinctoria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tinctoria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tinctoria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Platyops (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Platyops (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meleagris (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Meleagris (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:53, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mercenaria (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Mercenaria (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Armatus (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Armatus (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Falcata (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Falcata (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:10, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cuspidata (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Cuspidata (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 01:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discolor listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Discolor. Since you had some involvement with the Discolor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Unlocker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unlocker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unlocker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ukexpat (talk) 01:21, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Slevini

The article Slevini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A useless pile of redlinks

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 06:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ensiformis

The article Ensiformis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Once you remove the partial title matches, there is nothing left to disambiguate

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vernicosa

The article Vernicosa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Once you remove partial title matches, there's nothing left to disambiguate

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 01:55, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pelvis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pelvis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pelvis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Si Trew (talk) 19:49, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nana at RFD

Hi there, I've nominated the redirect Nάνα for deletion at WP:RFD. Uanfala (talk) 15:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maasikkaay listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Maasikkaay. Since you had some involvement with the Maasikkaay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Plantdrew (talk) 21:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of M10 motorway (Pakistan)

Hello Nono64,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged M10 motorway (Pakistan) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 08:13, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative One listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alternative One. Since you had some involvement with the Alternative One redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:28, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of N44 roads

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on List of N44 roads requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of N44 roads

A tag has been placed on List of N44 roads requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Snöggletög Nightfury ^{Happy Christmas!!} 11:22, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of N42 roads

A tag has been placed on List of N42 roads requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Snöggletög Nightfury ^{Happy Christmas!!} 11:28, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of N63 roads

A tag has been placed on List of N63 roads requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Snöggletög Nightfury ^{Happy Christmas!!} 11:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of N83 roads

A tag has been placed on List of N83 roads requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Snöggletög Nightfury ^{Happy Christmas!!} 11:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of N84 roads

A tag has been placed on List of N84 roads requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Snöggletög Nightfury ^{Happy Christmas!!} 11:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of N85 roads

A tag has been placed on List of N85 roads requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Snöggletög Nightfury ^{Happy Christmas!!} 11:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of N39 roads

A tag has been placed on List of N39 roads requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Snöggletög Nightfury ^{Happy Christmas!!} 11:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Furanochromone

Template:Furanochromone has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 11:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-virus signature updates listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anti-virus signature updates. Since you had some involvement with the Anti-virus signature updates redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --DanielPharos (talk) 23:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Reinecke for deletion

This is a courtesy message to notify you that the article Paul Reinecke is being considered for deletion. All editors, including you, are welcome to discuss this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Reinecke until a consensus is reached. The nomination and discussion are expected to focus on the quality of evidence and the policies and guidelines which are of concern. Please be aware that there are a number of arguments to avoid in a deletion discussion.

Users are encouraged to edit the article during the discussion, particularly in ways that address the concerns raised in that discussion. However, please do not attempt to remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article— doing so may be considered an act of bad faith and will not halt the deletion process. Thank you! Yashovardhan (talk) 20:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-virus signature update listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Anti-virus signature update. Since you had some involvement with the Anti-virus signature update redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ActoGeniX for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ActoGeniX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ActoGeniX until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:55, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrorna

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patrorna, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 20:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Empower (software)

The article Empower (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winged Blades^Godric 09:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Letter-NumberCombination

Template:Letter-NumberCombination has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:31, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanica listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Afghanica. Since you had some involvement with the Afghanica redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Plantdrew (talk) 16:30, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

属 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 属. Since you had some involvement with the 属 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 18:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

猫 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 猫. Since you had some involvement with the 猫 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 18:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

蝶 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 蝶. Since you had some involvement with the 蝶 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 18:47, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Latvian route member sign

Template:Latvian route member sign has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:11, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A16 highway (Lithuania)

Hello, Nono64. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, A16 highway (Lithuania), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Ongmianli (talk) 01:28, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Siamensis listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Siamensis. Since you had some involvement with the Siamensis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paul_012 (talk) 07:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scandens listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Scandens. Since you had some involvement with the Scandens redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Paul_012 (talk) 07:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

194.14 g/mol listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 194.14 g/mol. Since you had some involvement with the 194.14 g/mol redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Natureium (talk) 14:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese Journal of Natural Medicine listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chinese Journal of Natural Medicine. Since you had some involvement with the Chinese Journal of Natural Medicine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Phytochemistry Reviews listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Phytochemistry Reviews. Since you had some involvement with the Phytochemistry Reviews redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Progress in the Organic Chemistry of Natural Products listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Progress in the Organic Chemistry of Natural Products. Since you had some involvement with the Progress in the Organic Chemistry of Natural Products redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:25, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Road designation Red

Template:Road designation Red has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. –Fredddie ™ 04:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C19H24ClN3 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect C19H24ClN3. Since you had some involvement with the C19H24ClN3 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 23:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C24H27N2O13 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect C24H27N2O13. Since you had some involvement with the C24H27N2O13 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 23:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"А1 and А2" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect А1 and А2. Since you had some involvement with the А1 and А2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thomas J. Lawley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Thomas J. Lawley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Boleyn (talk) 14:25, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"F. Walker" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect F. Walker. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 29#F. Walker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:34, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Ferula jaeschkeana" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ferula jaeschkeana. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 8#Ferula jaeschkeana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 05:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Simca-Gordini T15" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Simca-Gordini T15. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 17#Simca-Gordini T15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 00:42, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Cenchrus (insect)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cenchrus (insect). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 23#Cenchrus (insect) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Estopedist1 (talk) 15:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Terrestris

The article Terrestris has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Latter half of a binomial name, unlikely that any of these species (or anything else) is known as a "terrestris".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 17:13, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"14H12O3" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 14H12O3. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 18#14H12O3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:50, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"C15H11ClO3" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect C15H11ClO3. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 18#C15H11ClO3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:17, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Benzofuran-3-one" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Benzofuran-3-one. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 19#Benzofuran-3-one until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 02:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"C12H18BrNO2" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect C12H18BrNO2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 11#C12H18BrNO2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AxiCorp

The article AxiCorp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources, only sef-citating

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Scuderia Sant'Ambroeus" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Scuderia Sant'Ambroeus and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 2#Scuderia Sant'Ambroeus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 06:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PKL for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PKL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PKL until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

AryKun (talk) 15:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Conjugation (biochemistry)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Conjugation (biochemistry) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 3#Conjugation (biochemistry) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Happy Editing--IAm Chaos 01:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"KISS(band)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect KISS(band) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 6#KISS(band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:06, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A5121 road (Great Britain)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A5121 road (Great Britain) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=A5121. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Imzadi 1979 → 23:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Health effects of phenols and polyphenols

The article Health effects of phenols and polyphenols has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page is redundant as health effects of these compounds should be included in the relevant page polyphenols

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Salto, Misiones" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Salto, Misiones and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 28#Salto, Misiones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"SALTO-YOUTH" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect SALTO-YOUTH and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 28#SALTO-YOUTH until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Rea (Disambiguation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Rea (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Rea (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Waterland Becque" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Waterland Becque and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 29#Waterland Becque until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:30, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Operational Preparation Directorate" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Operational Preparation Directorate and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 3#Operational Preparation Directorate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Operationalised Psychodynamic Diagnostics" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Operationalised Psychodynamic Diagnostics and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 3#Operationalised Psychodynamic Diagnostics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Original Promise Due Date Performance" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Original Promise Due Date Performance and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 3#Original Promise Due Date Performance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Spectrum quality management" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Spectrum quality management and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 3#Spectrum quality management until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:56, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"P92" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect P92 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 7#P92 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 14:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"XI-B" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect XI-B and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 8 § XI-B until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:29, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Chalcone (skipper)

A tag has been placed on Category:Chalcone (skipper) indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:12, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Quebrachos Department

The article Quebrachos Department has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"16s gene" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 16s gene has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 14 § 16s gene until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 01:00, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Phenethyl" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Phenethyl has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 25 § Phenethyl until a consensus is reached. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 05:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gigaspermaceae (disambiguation)

The article Gigaspermaceae (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:2DABS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 21:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Trinidad, Colombia" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Trinidad, Colombia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 3 § Trinidad, Colombia until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:54, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sativum (disambiguation)

The article Sativum (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

All of these entries are WP:Partial title matches not known as solely "Sativum".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sativum (disambiguation)

The article Sativum (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I've added the items here that weren't there to the list at Sativum. This disambiguation page is not needed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:37, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Ultraman Hayata" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ultraman Hayata has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 11 § Ultraman Hayata until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Boujenah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Boujenah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Boujenah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Password ^{(talk)(contribs)} 08:46, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Taxonomic authority disambiguation

Template:Taxonomic authority disambiguation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alphonse Joseph for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alphonse Joseph is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alphonse Joseph until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 11:22, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Phronima atlantica" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Phronima atlantica has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 21 § Phronima atlantica until a consensus is reached. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 00:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kishinouyei

The article Kishinouyei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:WINAD. This page's content is also included on Kamakichi Kishinouye's main page, so there is no need for it to be independent.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Petiolaris

The article Petiolaris has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This badly-formatted disambiguation page consists only of WP:Partial title matches. The user is better served by this page being deleted to avoid inhibiting Search, which is a better way of finding articles containing the term. There is no entry in Wiktionary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Center for Computational Mass Spectrometry

The article Center for Computational Mass Spectrometry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP: GNG. I found some sources about computational mass spectometry generally, but I could not find any sources about that would support this subject's notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HyperAccelerated (talk) 22:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]