Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takayoshi Sato

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) st170etalk 01:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Takayoshi Sato (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Japanese video game programmer. Of three refs in article, two are for interviews and one (deleted) was a wiki-type page. Further research turns up maybe one decent ref, but not enough to establish the independent in-depth coverage needed for notability. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 05:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see what's wong with the interviews. Interviews are the best information sources, you know. Anyway, the are articles with less information and references and still you keep them (for example: Mari Asato) DaftRose (talk) 18:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coffee // have a cup // beans // 21:25, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:33, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 15:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 16:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.