Robin's Reviews > The Expendable Man
The Expendable Man
by
by
I was taught well before I ever had my driver's license that I should never pick up a hitchhiker. Hitchhikers, my parents would tell me, could be dangerous. You just never knew. Terrible things could happen to someone who thinks they are just being a good samaritan.
Hugh Densmore has a suspicion when he sees a homely girl alone in the desert, that he shouldn't stop his car. But hey, it was 1963, and maybe Hugh's mother hadn't taught him the adage that no good deed goes unpunished.
He picks her up. His life is never the same again.
I won't say much more about the plot of this book, for fear of spoiling. Let's just say that Dorothy B. Hughes plays with her readers' assumptions for the first 50 or so pages, and then reveals something important that shapes the rest of the narrative in a meaningful way.
Although I suspected early on what she was doing, I admire her purpose. I admire her ability to write from a point of view that is clearly not her own. I admire how she trains her lens on racial realities for certain people in 1960s America.
On the back cover of my NYRB edition, Dorothy B. Hughes is compared to Patricia Highsmith and Raymond Chandler, as a master of mid-century noir. I do take a bit of exception to this. While I guess you could make an argument for Hughes as a noir writer (others have), I have to say that this seemed like more of a straightforward crime novel for me. This isn't a complaint, per se, although I prefer to read psychological suspense drenched in noir rather than something that is as clear-cut as The Expendable Man.
In noir, the lines between good and bad are often blurry. You end up rooting for someone who does dubious things. In noir, the endings are often dark and tragic.
Hughes' book is very different. Her protagonist is always good, always trying to do the right thing, innocent and well-meaning, responsible and moral and brave. All the good people are decidedly good, and all the bad people are simply vile. There's not much complexity or grey area in this regard. As for the ending, it's tidy, just, and even ties the strings of romance into a pretty bow.
Again, this isn't really a complaint, it's probably more a matter of personal taste. Despite my reservations, I do believe The Expendable Man is interesting, compelling, and socially important. It's a competent crime novel that deserves a wider readership. And it also confirms everything that my parents taught me about hitchhikers.
3.5 stars
Hugh Densmore has a suspicion when he sees a homely girl alone in the desert, that he shouldn't stop his car. But hey, it was 1963, and maybe Hugh's mother hadn't taught him the adage that no good deed goes unpunished.
He picks her up. His life is never the same again.
I won't say much more about the plot of this book, for fear of spoiling. Let's just say that Dorothy B. Hughes plays with her readers' assumptions for the first 50 or so pages, and then reveals something important that shapes the rest of the narrative in a meaningful way.
Although I suspected early on what she was doing, I admire her purpose. I admire her ability to write from a point of view that is clearly not her own. I admire how she trains her lens on racial realities for certain people in 1960s America.
On the back cover of my NYRB edition, Dorothy B. Hughes is compared to Patricia Highsmith and Raymond Chandler, as a master of mid-century noir. I do take a bit of exception to this. While I guess you could make an argument for Hughes as a noir writer (others have), I have to say that this seemed like more of a straightforward crime novel for me. This isn't a complaint, per se, although I prefer to read psychological suspense drenched in noir rather than something that is as clear-cut as The Expendable Man.
In noir, the lines between good and bad are often blurry. You end up rooting for someone who does dubious things. In noir, the endings are often dark and tragic.
Hughes' book is very different. Her protagonist is always good, always trying to do the right thing, innocent and well-meaning, responsible and moral and brave. All the good people are decidedly good, and all the bad people are simply vile. There's not much complexity or grey area in this regard. As for the ending, it's tidy, just, and even ties the strings of romance into a pretty bow.
Again, this isn't really a complaint, it's probably more a matter of personal taste. Despite my reservations, I do believe The Expendable Man is interesting, compelling, and socially important. It's a competent crime novel that deserves a wider readership. And it also confirms everything that my parents taught me about hitchhikers.
3.5 stars
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Expendable Man.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Comments Showing 1-25 of 25 (25 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Kalliope
(new)
Dec 21, 2021 11:10AM
You do raise one's curiosity, but then, your concerns would probably also be mine.
reply
|
flag
This was probably not the best place to start with Hughes, even though it was my starting point with her work. "In a Lonely Place" (NYRB edition is superb) and "Dread Journey" are both great.
Great review, Robin. Now I want to read it just so I can start a review with, "Hey baby, want a ride?"
Robin, I laughed out loud at your closing line! Thank you, I needed that. :) I got that same speech from my mom - it colored the whole idea of hitchhikers with a dark curiosity we must all share.I really appreciate your nuanced review - proof that you’re more of a grey-area person than black & white. If I don’t read this, I will certainly recommend it to friends who are comforted by clear lines of good and evil.
Kalliope wrote: "You do raise one's curiosity, but then, your concerns would probably also be mine."Thanks, Kalliope. I'm glad I read it, and think it's very good for what it is, but in the end, perhaps a little too straight and neat for my liking.
Same as you, I'll take blurriness anytime, Robin. Great review, though!I haven't read this author but Josh, above, enlightened me when he mentioned "In a Lonely Place". The movie is superb and Humphrey Bogart's leading part couldn't have been blurrier. You'll find complexity galore in that one.
Excellent, mysterious review, Robin. Funnily enough, as a student I was more wary of drives who would stop to pick up hitchhikers than the other way around but your review made me very curious about the alternative. Great to almost end this year revisiting your deft writing! :)
Josh wrote: "This was probably not the best place to start with Hughes, even though it was my starting point with her work. "In a Lonely Place" (NYRB edition is superb) and "Dread Journey" are both great."Hi there Josh. Thanks so much for your comment. I've heard she's best known for In a Lonely Place, and that's probably where I'd go next, though I'm not super motivated at the moment. I'm glad to know you can recommend her work, that's encouraging!
As kids, my sister and I always had a fascination with hitchhikers due to those parental warnings! I want to read this at some point, but I also prefer those characters that are not entirely wholesome. Terrific review, Robin!
Robin wrote: "Hi there Josh. Thanks so much for your comment. I've heard she's best known for In a Lonely Place, and that's probably where I'd go next, though I'm not super motivated at the moment. I'm glad to know you can recommend her work, that's encouraging!."No need to rush. I spent years between readings of her stuff and liked it better that way. At a time when not many women were writing this way and being acknowledged for their work, it was refreshing to read it.
Josh wrote: "No need to rush. I spent years between readings of her stuff and liked it better that way. At a time when not many women were writing this way and being acknowledged for their work, it was refreshing to read it."You make a good point - Hughes was unique as a woman in her genre, and really does deserve a wider readership. Thanks, Josh. Hope you are enjoying a happy holiday time!
Enjoyed reading your views on this one. I did rank it higher than you. I did not suspect that twist. FYI, the back listed boys have an episode on Hughes. Not this book but In a Lonely Place. I grew up in Montreal as I’ve mentioned. When going to college in the 70’s the buses of metro was always on strike. Must admit to doing my own hitchhiking in those days. Only one nutcase was encountered. Thank goodness. Of course, I have never picked anyone up.
Robin wrote: "You make a good point - Hughes was unique as a woman in her genre, and really does deserve a wider readership. Thanks, Josh. Hope you are enjoying a happy holiday time!"Unique is a good way to put it, happy holidays!
Left Coast Justin wrote: "Great review, Robin. Now I want to read it just so I can start a review with, "Hey baby, want a ride?""Hey, thanks Justin! I wish I had thought of that first. Now you've got to read it....
This is one well written review Robin as always a real treat, great stuff!Guess what!! I've finally got hold of a copy of Zombie by JCO - Happy Days!!
Tony wrote: "You do make it intriguing, Robin. Like Josh, I've read "In a Lonely Place." Next year for this one."I'm interesting to know what you thought of that one, Tony. Off to see your review now!
I can almost see you at the tiki bar shaking up a Jungle Bird and listening to Peggy Lee on your hi-fi stereo, Robin. Thank you for differentiating between suspense and noir. To some writers, evil is something out there on the highway or the dark side of town while to other writers, noir writers, the evil is already in each of us waiting to come out. I think Patricia Highsmith saw the world that way.
Jennifer wrote: "Robin, I laughed out loud at your closing line! Thank you, I needed that. :) I got that same speech from my mom - it colored the whole idea of hitchhikers with a dark curiosity we must all share.I really appreciate your nuanced review - proof that you’re more of a grey-area person than black & white. If I don’t read this, I will certainly recommend it to friends who are comforted by clear lines of good and evil."
Dear Jennifer, thank you! I hope you had a lovely time over the holidays. Thanks so much for your sweet comment (and all the conversations we have had this year). Wishing you all the best for 2022. xo
PS: it makes me laugh to know I'm not the only one who has an apprehension toward hitchhikers!
Violeta wrote: "Same as you, I'll take blurriness anytime, Robin. Great review, though!I haven't read this author but Josh, above, enlightened me when he mentioned "In a Lonely Place". The movie is superb and Humphrey Bogart's leading part couldn't have been blurrier. You'll find complexity galore in that one.."
Oh, that's really good to know, Violeta. I have heard from a few people now that In a Lonely Place has noir (and blurriness) to spare, so one day I will find a copy, and perhaps see the film too!
Dolors wrote: "Excellent, mysterious review, Robin. Funnily enough, as a student I was more wary of drives who would stop to pick up hitchhikers than the other way around but your review made me very curious about the alternative.Great to almost end this year revisiting your deft writing! :)"
Thanks so much Dolors. I always count myself very lucky to have you visit one of my reviews. That IS funny, about your wariness of those picking up hitchhikers - I also had this drilled into me by my parents. In addition to "don't pick up hitchhikers" they also told me "never ever hitchhike". It was the beginning of helicopter parenting, I think, and in this case, probably wise advice....
Candi wrote: "As kids, my sister and I always had a fascination with hitchhikers due to those parental warnings! I want to read this at some point, but I also prefer those characters that are not entirely wholesome. Terrific review, Robin!"Thank you, Candi! Yeah, those hitchhikers, they are fascinating. You know there's got to be a story about why/how they find themselves thumbing for a ride. As for this book, it's definitely worth reading, despite its general neatness. The point of view is original and the story is compelling. I look forward to hearing your thoughts if/when....
Antoinette wrote: "Enjoyed reading your views on this one. I did rank it higher than you. I did not suspect that twist. FYI, the back listed boys have an episode on Hughes. Not this book but In a Lonely Place.I grew up in Montreal as I’ve mentioned. When going to college in the 70’s the buses of metro was always on strike. Must admit to doing my own hitchhiking in those days. Only one nutcase was encountered. Thank goodness. Of course, I have never picked anyone up."
Antoinette, now that you mention having read it, I believe it was your wonderful review which put this book on my radar, and for that I thank you!!
As for the twist, I don't know why but I figured it out early on (there's another noir book that I've read that did this, but didn't reveal the twist until the final sentence of the book - I don't think this worked AT ALL, while it worked beautifully in Hughes' book).
I'm really glad that you survived your hitchhiking days in Montreal. I've been thinking of that lovely place, and missing my friends there, lately. Did you hear they have been locked down again, complete with curfew? :(
Mark wrote: "This is one well written review Robin as always a real treat, great stuff!Guess what!! I've finally got hold of a copy of Zombie by JCO - Happy Days!!"
Oh my goodness, Zombie, now that's something else. I'm going to have to have a look to see where you're at with it....
Thanks, Mark, as always, for your kind comments.
Joe wrote: "I can almost see you at the tiki bar shaking up a Jungle Bird and listening to Peggy Lee on your hi-fi stereo, Robin. Thank you for differentiating between suspense and noir. To some writers, evil is something out there on the highway or the dark side of town while to other writers, noir writers, the evil is already in each of us waiting to come out. I think Patricia Highsmith saw the world that way."Yes! I think that's exactly what she thought, Joe, and it's what I think too. :)
To be fair, from what I've heard from other friends who have read Hughes' other works, noir fits as a descriptor, but this book seemed quite light in that regard, at least to me.


